↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2021
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.11517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine E. Oldenburg, Benjamin A. Pinsky, Jessica Brogdon, Cindi Chen, Kevin Ruder, Lina Zhong, Fanice Nyatigo, Catherine A. Cook, Armin Hinterwirth, Elodie Lebas, Travis Redd, Travis C. Porco, Thomas M. Lietman, Benjamin F. Arnold, Thuy Doan

Abstract

Azithromycin has been hypothesized to have activity against SARS-CoV-2. To determine whether oral azithromycin in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. Randomized clinical trial of azithromycin vs matching placebo conducted from May 2020 through March 2021. Outpatients from the US were enrolled remotely via internet-based surveys and followed up for 21 days. Eligible participants had a positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test result (nucleic acid amplification or antigen) within 7 days prior to enrollment, were aged 18 years or older, and were not hospitalized at the time of enrollment. Among 604 individuals screened, 297 were ineligible, 44 refused participation, and 263 were enrolled. Participants, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment randomization. Participants were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to a single oral 1.2-g dose of azithromycin (n = 171) or matching placebo (n = 92). The primary outcome was absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. There were 23 secondary clinical end points, including all-cause hospitalization at day 21. Among 263 participants who were randomized (median age, 43 years; 174 [66%] women; 57% non-Hispanic White and 29% Latinx/Hispanic), 76% completed the trial. The trial was terminated by the data and safety monitoring committee for futility after the interim analysis. At day 14, there was no significant difference in proportion of participants who were symptom free (azithromycin: 50%; placebo: 50%; prevalence difference, 0%; 95% CI, -14% to 15%; P > .99). Of 23 prespecified secondary clinical end points, 18 showed no significant difference. By day 21, 5 participants in the azithromycin group had been hospitalized compared with 0 in the placebo group (prevalence difference, 4%; 95% CI, -1% to 9%; P = .16). Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, treatment with a single dose of azithromycin compared with placebo did not result in greater likelihood of being symptom free at day 14. These findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin for outpatient SARS-CoV-2 infection. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04332107.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,235 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Professor 6 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 38 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 42 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1333. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,142
of 20,072,700 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#207
of 31,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#387
of 334,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#10
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,072,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,019 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.