| Title |
Real time remote symptom monitoring during chemotherapy for cancer: European multicentre randomised controlled trial (eSMART)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.n1647 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roma Maguire, Lisa McCann, Grigorios Kotronoulas, Nora Kearney, Emma Ream, Jo Armes, Elisabeth Patiraki, Eileen Furlong, Patricia Fox, Alexander Gaiger, Paul McCrone, Geir Berg, Christine Miaskowski, Antonella Cardone, Dawn Orr, Adrian Flowerday, Stylianos Katsaragakis, Andrew Darley, Simone Lubowitzki, Jenny Harris, Simon Skene, Morven Miller, Margaret Moore, Liane Lewis, Nicosha DeSouza, Peter T Donnan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 42 | 30% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Ireland | 8 | 6% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 87 | 63% |
| Scientists | 24 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 344 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 8% |
| Researcher | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 13% |
| Unknown | 176 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 12% |
| Psychology | 11 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 40 | 12% |
| Unknown | 188 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 191. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#211,777
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,858
of 65,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,970
of 447,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#85
of 686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.