| Title |
Lower serum 25(OH)D levels associated with higher risk of COVID-19 infection in U.S. Black women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0255132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yvette C. Cozier, Nelsy Castro-Webb, Natasha S. Hochberg, Lynn Rosenberg, Michelle A. Albert, Julie R. Palmer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 7% |
| Japan | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 84% |
| Scientists | 7 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 31 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#269,377
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,873
of 221,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,395
of 441,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#80
of 2,783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.