| Title |
Treatment of fibrotic interstitial lung disease: current approaches and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01826-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerri A Johannson, Nazia Chaudhuri, Ayodeji Adegunsoye, Paul J Wolters |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 9 | 11% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| Spain | 6 | 7% |
| India | 4 | 5% |
| Ireland | 3 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 24% |
| Scientists | 12 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 38 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2021.
All research outputs
#750,301
of 25,476,463 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#6,273
of 42,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,851
of 433,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#113
of 323 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,476,463 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 323 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.