| Title |
A roadmap for the Human Developmental Cell Atlas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-03620-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muzlifah Haniffa, Deanne Taylor, Sten Linnarsson, Bruce J. Aronow, Gary D. Bader, Roger A. Barker, Pablo G. Camara, J. Gray Camp, Alain Chédotal, Andrew Copp, Heather C. Etchevers, Paolo Giacobini, Berthold Göttgens, Guoji Guo, Ania Hupalowska, Kylie R. James, Emily Kirby, Arnold Kriegstein, Joakim Lundeberg, John C. Marioni, Kerstin B. Meyer, Kathy K. Niakan, Mats Nilsson, Bayanne Olabi, Dana Pe’er, Aviv Regev, Jennifer Rood, Orit Rozenblatt-Rosen, Rahul Satija, Sarah A. Teichmann, Barbara Treutlein, Roser Vento-Tormo, Simone Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 439 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 10% |
| Canada | 17 | 4% |
| France | 13 | 3% |
| Germany | 10 | 2% |
| India | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 73 | 17% |
| Unknown | 173 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 240 | 55% |
| Scientists | 173 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 350 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 19% |
| Researcher | 63 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 104 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 105 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 5% |
| Engineering | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 42 | 12% |
| Unknown | 116 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 323. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#106,403
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#7,252
of 98,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,975
of 436,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#193
of 934 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 934 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.