| Title |
A practical guide to large-scale docking
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian J. Bender, Stefan Gahbauer, Andreas Luttens, Jiankun Lyu, Chase M. Webb, Reed M. Stein, Elissa A. Fink, Trent E. Balius, Jens Carlsson, John J. Irwin, Brian K. Shoichet |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Sweden | 5 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 5% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 33 | 51% |
| Members of the public | 30 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 605 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 605 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 110 | 18% |
| Researcher | 89 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 71 | 12% |
| Unknown | 210 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 116 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 106 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 40 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 10% |
| Unknown | 230 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#939,113
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#217
of 2,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,903
of 437,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#8
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.