| Title |
Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 entry and replication in airway mucosal tissue and susceptibility in smokers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports Medicine, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsuguhisa Nakayama, Ivan T. Lee, Sizun Jiang, Matthias S. Matter, Carol H. Yan, Jonathan B. Overdevest, Chien-Ting Wu, Yury Goltsev, Liang-Chun Shih, Chun-Kang Liao, Bokai Zhu, Yunhao Bai, Peter Lidsky, Yinghong Xiao, David Zarabanda, Angela Yang, Meena Easwaran, Christian M. Schürch, Pauline Chu, Han Chen, Anna K. Stalder, David R. McIlwain, Nicole A. Borchard, Phillip A. Gall, Sachi S. Dholakia, Wei Le, Le Xu, Chih-Jaan Tai, Te-Huei Yeh, Elizabeth Erickson-Direnzo, Jason M. Duran, Kirsten D. Mertz, Peter H. Hwang, Jasmin D. Haslbauer, Peter K. Jackson, Thomas Menter, Raul Andino, Peter D. Canoll, Adam S. DeConde, Zara M. Patel, Alexandar Tzankov, Garry P. Nolan, Jayakar V. Nayak |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 355 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 11% |
| Mexico | 34 | 10% |
| Argentina | 21 | 6% |
| Spain | 14 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| India | 5 | 1% |
| Canada | 5 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 187 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 305 | 86% |
| Scientists | 32 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 32 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 34 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 264. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#140,158
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports Medicine
#62
of 1,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,913
of 437,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports Medicine
#3
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.