| Title |
Geographically targeted COVID-19 vaccination is more equitable and averts more deaths than age-based thresholds alone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Advances, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1126/sciadv.abj2099 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Wrigley-Field, Mathew V. Kiang, Alicia R. Riley, Magali Barbieri, Yea-Hung Chen, Kate A. Duchowny, Ellicott C. Matthay, David Van Riper, Kirrthana Jegathesan, Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Jonathon P. Leider |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 112 | 52% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 119 | 56% |
| Scientists | 70 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 478. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2023.
All research outputs
#57,434
of 25,918,061 outputs
Outputs from Science Advances
#696
of 12,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,689
of 439,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Advances
#29
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,061 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 119.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.