| Title |
Research priorities for an HIV cure: International AIDS Society Global Scientific Strategy 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41591-021-01590-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven Deeks, Sharon Lewin, Marein de Jong, Zaza Ndhlovu, Nicolas Chomont, Zabrina Brumme, Kai Deng, Luke Jasenosky, Richard Jefferys, Aurelio Orta-Resendiz, Frank Mardarelli, Monique Nijhuis, Katharine Bar, Bonnie Howell, Alex Schneider, Gabriela Turk, Rose Nabatanzi, Joel Blankson, J. Victor Garcia, Mirko Paiardini, Jan van Lunzen, Christina Antoniadi, Fernanda Heloise Côrtes, Susana Valente, Ole S. Søgaard, Ricardo Sobhie Diaz, Melannie Ott, Richard (Rick) Dunham, Siegfried Schwarze, Santiago Perez Patrigeon, Josephine Nabukenya, Marina Caskey, Beatriz Mothe, Fu Sheng Wang, Sarah Fidler, Devi SenGupta, Stephan Dressler, Mitch Matoga, Hans-Peter Kiem, Pablo Tebas, Cissy Kityo, Boro Dropulic, Michael Louella, Kumitaa Theva Das, Deborah Persaud, Ann Chahroudi, Katherine Luzuriaga, Thanyawee Puthanakit, Jeffrey Safrit, Gaerolwe Masheto, Karine Dubé, Jennifer Power, Jessica Salzwedel, Udom Likhitwonnawut, Jeff Taylor, Oguzhan Latif Nuh, Krista Dong, Edward Nelson Kankaka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 37 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% |
| Mexico | 9 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 4 | 2% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Thailand | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 19% |
| Unknown | 84 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 150 | 69% |
| Scientists | 39 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 284 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 117 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 128 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 193. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#209,143
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#856
of 9,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,888
of 517,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#30
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.