| Title |
US State-Level Legal Interventions Related to COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2021.22122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Breanna Fernandes, Mark Christopher Navin, Dorit Rubinstein Reiss, Saad B. Omer, Katie Attwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 45% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 60% |
| Scientists | 16 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2022.
All research outputs
#853,767
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#7,662
of 36,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,704
of 520,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#133
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.