| Title |
Evolution of enhanced innate immune evasion by SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-021-04352-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy G. Thorne, Mehdi Bouhaddou, Ann-Kathrin Reuschl, Lorena Zuliani-Alvarez, Ben Polacco, Adrian Pelin, Jyoti Batra, Matthew V. X. Whelan, Myra Hosmillo, Andrea Fossati, Roberta Ragazzini, Irwin Jungreis, Manisha Ummadi, Ajda Rojc, Jane Turner, Marie L. Bischof, Kirsten Obernier, Hannes Braberg, Margaret Soucheray, Alicia Richards, Kuei-Ho Chen, Bhavya Harjai, Danish Memon, Joseph Hiatt, Romel Rosales, Briana L. McGovern, Aminu Jahun, Jacqueline M. Fabius, Kris White, Ian G. Goodfellow, Yasu Takeuchi, Paola Bonfanti, Kevan Shokat, Natalia Jura, Klim Verba, Mahdad Noursadeghi, Pedro Beltrao, Manolis Kellis, Danielle L. Swaney, Adolfo García-Sastre, Clare Jolly, Greg J. Towers, Nevan J. Krogan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 478 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 68 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 51 | 11% |
| India | 17 | 4% |
| Canada | 9 | 2% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Japan | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 1% |
| Greece | 6 | 1% |
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 239 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 347 | 73% |
| Scientists | 104 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 16% |
| Researcher | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 103 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 24 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 103 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1254. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#11,062
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,115
of 98,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#450
of 517,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#44
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.