| Title |
Assessment of Hypothetical Out-of-Pocket Costs of Guideline-Recommended Medications for the Treatment of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions, 2009 and 2019
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Internal Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7457 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianna Zhou, Patrick Liu, Sanket S. Dhruva, Nilay D. Shah, Reshma Ramachandran, Karina M. Berg, Joseph S. Ross |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 42 | 56% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 55% |
| Scientists | 25 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#532,154
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#2,058
of 11,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,363
of 519,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#32
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 84.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.