↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Hypothetical Out-of-Pocket Costs of Guideline-Recommended Medications for the Treatment of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions, 2009 and 2019

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
65 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Assessment of Hypothetical Out-of-Pocket Costs of Guideline-Recommended Medications for the Treatment of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions, 2009 and 2019
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.7457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianna Zhou, Patrick Liu, Sanket S. Dhruva, Nilay D. Shah, Reshma Ramachandran, Karina M. Berg, Joseph S. Ross

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#420,652
of 20,060,859 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#1,710
of 4,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,386
of 297,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#35
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,060,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 151.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.