@ChinsYour @qandamazon You can begin by learning what the word experiment means
@binbou415 工作員が焦ってますよ
お前は頭が悪いので、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は頭が悪いので、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は頭が悪いので、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は〇〇だから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は〇〇だから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前は〇〇だから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@MikkoKo61365469 Kuka valehtelee? "Alustava havainto" on markkinointia, ei tiedettä. -> Pfizerin 3. vaiheen kliinistä tutkimusta käsittelevä paperi (New England Journal of Medicine, 12/20) ei edes mainitse viruksen tarttumista. 1/2 https://t.co/0TJYTat
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @iXeno: @Earthdriver @thereal_truther @CentristAllWay @DrNice2022 Have you ever read the 2 month long RCT published in December of 2020?…
@Earthdriver @thereal_truther @CentristAllWay @DrNice2022 Have you ever read the 2 month long RCT published in December of 2020? Or are you able to ignore it and just revert to The Grand Conspiracy? It’s easy to live in denial if you preemptively ignore ev
@8lissFullyAware @aftab_usa Pharma shills, huh? Did you know that this vaccine was produced at cost during the pandemic? That many places offer the mRNA vaccine for free? Kind of a poor profit strategy. https://t.co/GJwZ29UfIz
@NMoonitz @aftab_usa Not on duty! He’s not going to practice medicine under the influence! Oh, you meant the vaccine, not tequila. Okay, well, here it is: https://t.co/GJwZ29UfIz
@MosesH75651 @Julie42190 @MayoIsSpicyy Perhaps you should also look at facts instead of spreading lies that get people sick or killed. These are facts: https://t.co/GJwZ29UfIz
@zarintia @BenderOfuscado Eso no es una publicación científica. El título del artículo no se corresponde con el contenido. Si tuvieras un mínimo nivel lo verías. El estudio al que se refiere es éste 👇, lo que digan en prensa es irrelevante. https://t.co/ty
@HansLandman @ErikHensema @DutchWarrior7 @Peter_Hetzalwel Tiens, het is nochtans niet zo moeilijk om studies te vinden die aantonen dat ze veilig en effectief zijn, hoor. https://t.co/6CBnbidG6R https://t.co/r8Poa2HtRC https://t.co/lTeGsE8Cc8 https://
@gocrashboombang @MartinKulldorff @tiktok_us @MaximilianTowey It is actually is true. It is written right in the results. https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@hkakeya お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 お前は、理解どころか読めないバカなので、 読もうとしなくてよい。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 お前は、理解どころか読めないバカなので、 読もうとしなくてよい。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@HooliganWilder @zap_lock "never went through clinical trials," lies local moron https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w No one dumber or more dishonest than anti-vaxer
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
@Jessben79476046 Está publicación es la primera de cientos. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 6/ Dies erfolgte erst am 10.12.2020. Das #RKI hatte diese essentiellen Daten also zum Zeitpunkt des Beginns der Erstel…
@barbout @StabellBenn @AlastairMcA30 @RobertKennedyJr All easily answered. https://t.co/K530gg0Cj3 You realize that asking questions without bothering to look for an answer is a problem, right?
@davestewart3 @Broekm @CofSnz @CartlandDavid Phase 3 Pfizer trial 43,448 people enrolled 170 cases of covid. 8 in the vaccinated, 162 in the placebo, which group will spread it? So it reduces transmission cos if you aint got it you can't transmit it. ht
@Megalodon_2nd @MemberOfTheMass @_johnbye There was a parallel contol group. You'd know that if you read the bleeding paper. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc https://t.co/yH2us4g1dW
@Megalodon_2nd @MemberOfTheMass @_johnbye You haven't read the phase 3 trial. Some side effects are so rare that they didn't show up in the trial, which only included 43,448 people. That's why we have post-marketing surveillance. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@TheGlottis @koo_kristian @MikaVauhkala Nohynekillä ei ollut asiasta tietoa -> Pfizerin 3. vaiheen tutkimusta käsittelevä paperi ei edes mainitse viruksen tarttumista: https://t.co/0TJYTatWg9 1/2
@MikkoKo61365469 Pfizerin 3. vaiheen kliinistä tutkimusta käsittelevä paperi (New England Journal of Medicine, 12/20) ei edes mainitse viruksen tarttumista. 2/3 https://t.co/0TJYTatWg9
@dvrkchyld @ConConBonBon32 @maxsonrichards @BarryESharp Tell me what you find wrong in this primary research paper: https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@famoussasuk @dithespy50 Start here; You may learn something. https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF
@Pierrotdu69 @les_vaxxeuses @decoder_l Bah lisez et encore une fois, n'hésitez pas à prouver scientifiquement que c'est faux 🤣 https://t.co/23nqsIK1TR
@Alessio95659124 @LaStampa Peccato che non sia una balla ma quanto risulta dal trial pre autorizzativo. Ovvero la verità al dicembre 20, momento della pubblicazione https://t.co/oliBCA51kT https://t.co/G3kJrjX1pE
@healthestore @nzdsos how much bollocks are you talking lots of regurgitating anti vax tropes from your anti vax daddy's tell me how from this trial you got that figure https://t.co/cvUZaKSTaP
@lavalmxhr @TheeLoneGunmen @jneill @BreezerGalway @yawlnellie10 @k_b_lvi @againstme123456 @spursonfifa @swords_mr @macgyvertang20 Trust me, your absolute lack of knowledge make me laugh. is a link enough or you need more help? https://t.co/u19iuuagTr
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@wakutinwadoku ですね!
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
@Christojt @PTLRadioShow @stkirsch @P_McCulloughMD Can’t see. Kirsch blocked me. Nothing is or can be 100% safe. Myocarditis is rare. It is far more common with COVID. They did safety and efficacy tests. That is what the clinical trials were for. Your ig
@ID_Denmark @yoshkapundrick @rdmorris @Stanford Are you again pretending not to know the difference between absolute risk reduction vs. relative risk reduction? A healthy child having low absolute risk does not mean the relative risk reduction is 0%. htt
@sudokuvariante @rdmorris @Stanford Why? It's not like a vaccine denialist + conspiracist like you is honestly interested in evidence. You'll just evade in bad faith. https://t.co/hLpj7braMv https://t.co/geFpUdJWdR https://t.co/tgm0oNakmC https://t.co/H
@astwin15 @PharmaMedic95 @myriampalomba Ça doit vouloir dire : "oui j'ai hâte en tant que juriste de lire à quel point je me suis planté et mes arguments sont aux fraises vu que je suis nul en sciences". Bonne lecture : https://t.co/23nqsIK1TR
@MisterMichael6 @dogmomjenn @IvanasStairCam Yes, gaslighting is what you’re attempting to do. However, the hard evidence debunks your false narrative. https://t.co/GJwZ29UfIz
@DeadheadJP99 @DrSusanOliver1 Adverse Events...c'mon. Its been 4 years you should understand the difference. Oh and then compare and contrast each cohort/groups. Read the whole Research & NCT: https://t.co/VeWI0g5XkS https://t.co/JVGPrF37K7
@mario64425917 @QLexPipiens https://t.co/SNk4nLOQiQ Trials su 42.000 volontari, boccalone no brain. Nessun morto causato dai vaccini a mRNA, minorato mentale https://t.co/i6fbE53tJ0
@LExiliado @BeatrizTalegon Léalo usted misma. Este el el resultado de los primeros ensayos clínicos de seguridad y eficacia. Posteriormente hay muchos más. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@MisterMichael6 @dogmomjenn @IvanasStairCam So you post people who are acting, or taking clinical videos and making false claims about the people depicted. You’re basically pushing the same disinformation which got people killed in 2020. Let’s look at the
6) The Pfizer Landmark Phase 3 trial referred to, showed relatively few cases of severe Covid and McCullough diverts to that on purpose. https://t.co/XTyC0KSWkt
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
RT @rinset37984: もう世の中には 「金で汚れた薬」 しか存在しないと思った方が早いかも どっちにしろ私は薬は極力服用しないようにするけど
@willPS21 @Creativologist @etem422 @Questio31810600 @Headbanger215 @YourFerntasy @yawlnellie10 @MaxDippyDog @apocalypse_boss @ButHisEmails @Similar89 You didn't read it. It debunked your claim https://t.co/zSPLffDeEG
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
RT @LyingWrongAgain: @Michael65971864 @nitya_vastu @SpaceWoot @MrHansen18 @RichardDawkins @jordanbpeterson Actually it was terribly inconve…
@Michael65971864 @nitya_vastu @SpaceWoot @MrHansen18 @RichardDawkins @jordanbpeterson Actually it was terribly inconvenient “Or perhaps they were never particularly effective to begin with” Thanks, Guy on Internet! Hang on, Real World wants to say some
Nr. 4 @RTLDE_Corporate Deshalb ist RTL für mich ein für alle mal gestorben. So etwas möchte ich als Zuschauer nicht unterstützen. Das ist meine Meinung dazu.
@ToBornin @dense_evi Indeed, they did https://t.co/u19iuuagTr, https://t.co/xP7aI4lBIn.
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@Aktivarum @RichardDawkins @jordanbpeterson Yes they were. Here’s one of the clinical trials https://t.co/5kUEyjtIOR
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
@Karl_Lauterbach @BMG_Bund Frage zur Studie: Wie kann ein Placebo schwere Nebenwirkungen auslösen? "Die Inzidenz schwerer Nebenwirkungen war bei den Impfstoff- und Placebo-Gruppen ähnlich (0,6% bzw. 0,5%)." https://t.co/o5Ln9h8IBY
RT @huisartslieneke: Dit is er zo een. A highly qualified professor from Stanford, volledig genegeerd de afgelopen jaren.
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
RT @huisartslieneke: Dit is er zo een. A highly qualified professor from Stanford, volledig genegeerd de afgelopen jaren.
Blome ist ein üble Gestalt mit vorgefertigtem Auftrag. Dazu auch noch unvorsichtig genug, das öffentlich erkennen zu lassen.
@PastorDrue @RichardDawkins @jordanbpeterson This trial included 42,000 people Not six mice https://t.co/5kUEyjtIOR
@ARHJ07 @NoahNewbegin @RichardDawkins @jordanbpeterson @elonmusk Sure, here was one of them https://t.co/5kUEyjtIOR
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
もう世の中には 「金で汚れた薬」 しか存在しないと思った方が早いかも どっちにしろ私は薬は極力服用しないようにするけど
PubMedで検索してみた🔍 BioNTech および Pfizer からの資金提供 BioNTech および Pfizer からの資金提供 BioNTech および Pfizer からの資金提供 https://t.co/scvAQdhs7A https://t.co/zHLhXq5Gp8
RT @huisartslieneke: Dit is er zo een. A highly qualified professor from Stanford, volledig genegeerd de afgelopen jaren.
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 4/ Was war denn überhaupt schon am 07.12.20 über die #Covid19-#Impfstoffe bekannt, als @NikolausBlome diese unmenschlich…
@blaurent71 @LindaWh000012 @tweetMalena @JoJoFromJerz Then why did it prevent transmission and infection, or where breakthrough infections happened, prevented lifetime debilitating disease and death? The clinical evidence debunks your false statements. ht
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…