Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

https://t.co/HUdvqG8tvK

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…

By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR positive symptomatic disease. So 154 patients "benefited". Or did they? There were up to 207 missing patients in this exact group. htt

@AchileasHeel @robbyvirus @PhillyPharmaBoy https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@matthew_preilis @CRHawk57 @bennyjohnson https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

RT @Roper_Lab: @Jrsatty @ci2twit @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta All of the US approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III hu…

@Jrsatty @ci2twit @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta All of the US approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020. Some data was released in Oct 2020. Safety dat

@just_neet1 @Jessica191965 @adam696_ @abiroberts @GaryLineker Here are the literal results: https://t.co/dwHSklSsnV

RT @jpkiekens: Safe & Effective! Guess who is the principal author of the study, funded by BioNTech & Pfizer, relying on the warp-speed rec…

@stephenmcstay8 @zoeharcombe Here are the results of the phase III trials for the Pfizer vaccine. As you can see, they were completed a long time ago. Hope this helps! https://t.co/ac0ZIXncZc

RT @jpkiekens: Safe & Effective! Guess who is the principal author of the study, funded by BioNTech & Pfizer, relying on the warp-speed rec…

RT @jpkiekens: Safe & Effective! Guess who is the principal author of the study, funded by BioNTech & Pfizer, relying on the warp-speed rec…

@jim_thepatriot @CudaBdoll @Laurel4liberty @CMA_Docs @LionAdvocacy @roccogalatilaw @JCCFCanada @dockaurG @DrPPhillipsMD @RochagneK @ashkaur @doc_turek @strauss_matt @drmikehart @TuckerCarlson @thevivafrei @TheRealKeean @Matt_HorwoodWS @RebelNewsOnline @jor

@michel500408s @GuerquinThomas @silvano_trotta N'importe quoi. Relisez l'étude initiale. Aucun médicament ne peut être testé sur la transmission ! Parce qu'on n'enferme pas les volontaires ensemble pendant des mois et on ne lâche pas le virus sur eux. Pro

@mitsunori198012 @qAvGUQbRQv1rZ54 @hiro95552236 第三相国際臨床試験の結果が公開されてますが

@mitsunori198012 @qAvGUQbRQv1rZ54 @hiro95552236 https://t.co/9sCwCVEj5f 動画で「臨床試験は必要なく、むしろできません」って言ってますが 臨床試験ははやってますよ？ その時点で嘘じゃないですかw

@Cuchie_coo @HKDAWG81 @sorefing3r @CartlandDavid @dgurdasani1 Here is the NEJM publication of the early efficacy study. https://t.co/AHVPlodQxo Here is Pfizer's announcement of their initial study. https://t.co/LR1FmkaFVF Each clearly defines what they me

The rebuttal to that is when the data was published originally, it only covered 2 months observation period. "Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines." https://t.co/QbrJNEFWUB Insufficient to make such a claim.

@atheeryal @CelebsArabic عزيزتي المسألة بسيطة جداً أي أحد عنده إدعاء علمي أو طبي يقدم ما هو الدليل العلمي أو الدراسة التي إستند عليها غير كذا يصير الكلام مجرد سوالف ما لها أي قيمة خلينا نتعلم المنهجية العلمية في الطرح بدل هذي الفوضى https://t.co/xi7Dwkc

@realZenelan @gadboit Pfizer rct (most widely used) has many caveats & for me the numbers of severe disease are too low to conclude anything https://t.co/0qTNXomzQP

@GLLEYL @ColonnelCourdel @LMPositif Dès le début on savait que la transmission n'avait pas été testée, c'était écrit noir sur blanc dans l'étude de Pfizer ayant permis l'AMM conditionnelle. Ca date quand même de décembre 2020. https://t.co/nVq7REJpds https

@Moon21ro @ItsNotMe_ItsEwe @kyryan1988 @dense_evi @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr You're right, you don't release something untested out in the world. You do a proper RCT test on it first. Fortunately, they did: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@Ross8933 @kyryan1988 @dense_evi @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@kyryan1988 @dense_evi @VigilantFox @RobertKennedyJr Here's the testing: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@Volturio @les_vaxxeuses @youpy77 >sans aucune preuve 44000 personnes enrôlées dans l’étude. 😘 https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ

@Mark_Williamz @stilletio1 @ABridgen https://t.co/7jKvq0Wsd1

@Krazeyray2 @ABridgen Here you go. Happy reading. https://t.co/7jKvq0Wsd1

RT @cpeedell: @CartlandDavid @geoffsoulsby @chrischirp While I am waiting, here is another one https://t.co/RljFwTqOnY

@CaelorumAngelus @Wim04789402 @Coolbird76 OK, zoals je wil. Klinische studie van Pfizer: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R

RT @cpeedell: @CartlandDavid @geoffsoulsby @chrischirp While I am waiting, here is another one https://t.co/RljFwTqOnY

@Leonard77644839 @PaBordi @LaBombetta76 Cheppalle. https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB

@CartlandDavid @geoffsoulsby @chrischirp While I am waiting, here is another one https://t.co/RljFwTqOnY

@CartlandDavid @VenetiaCastigl @Otto_English 🤷🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/ehzAvJjnOh

@gatorhans03 @jason_willz1 @davidhadballs @nannyamsp @VigilantFox @RenzTom @ThenZip @EricShawnE79 Again, this is false. I cited several studies, and here are the randomized controlled trials. https://t.co/gqXhOqIIL9 https://t.co/cAkcGlL6wl

@MaryShadeRN @docbristow949 @catturd2 Wow that was easy. Look at all the evidence that the vaccine works. https://t.co/3zzv2JFTIF

@ATweetie1984 Musste gerade wieder an diese herstellerfinanzierten Superstudien denken, wo kein Mensch starb, in keiner von beiden Gruppen. https://t.co/9WPjZK3BAG

@MunteROM @gbuhnici @CryptOracl Da. La vaccin au fost prezentate studiile. Găsești grămezi pe net. https://t.co/hZK86ME4xm

@rautakansleri_ @milaakso @ktyrannia https://t.co/snHA5MXagy

@milaakso @ktyrannia Ei. Alkuperäisessä trialissa oli 43 548 oaallistujaa, joista puolet sai rokotteen. https://t.co/WaeFcw3sDc Videon taulukko ei ole alkuperäisestä trialista vaan post marketing päivityksestä, jolloin oli jo annettu miljoonia annoksia j

@sergiespert @sej_johnsson @JornalOGlobo De 2020 ainda, uma das primeiras feitas um mês dela ter saído a público. Teste feito com 43 mil participantes, bem pequeno comparado aos atuais bilhões que hoje se vacinaram com ela https://t.co/4CpbTEMWkd

@DanMan_010101 @AdrianaSpappa https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Lacunosi nel vuoto pneumatico che hai tra le orecchie.

@fracchio_2 @AdrianaSpappa https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Invece si, al 95% fino alla Delta,62% con le Omicron. Studia

@CrostyGa @AdrianaSpappa Cazzata,fino alla Delta la protezione da contagio era del 95%,con le Omicron è scesa al 62.https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB

@zee_parody @volpiranyas @GiveABJGoToJail @TonyBaduy @cbeckj @Pouldeau61 @richykirsh @addict_opiate @mcfunny @f_kyburz @nopoisonjabs @pawley_robert @MaureenStroud @PlatoonOps @ptcjoneses @ogilville1 @AndrewLazarus4 @Kathmarval @provaxtexan @JimeeLiberty @B

@DrSusanOliver1 Or read the actual published trial data for the COVID vaccines themselves: https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl https://t.co/fJOksklrAu

@stevetallent @NMoonitz @jeffreyatucker You lied again. The initial tests indeed showed 95% effectiveness. https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w

@Bannisterious @ActualKahuna @PhillyPharmaBoy @Gdixxn21 This is the Pfizer trial paper

@mellefluous @juneslater17 Now, I know that someone like June will be very keen to do her own research, so ... Polack, F. P., Thomas, S. J., Kitchin, N., et al. (2020). Safety and efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine. New England Journal of Med

@jason_willz1 @ErikaJK1016 @HeyNurseKat @rt7683 It's always telling when the non-expert vaccine denialists show their true colors (ex: on case reports). So many of them have been attracted to Prasad's contrarian antics. https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc

@ElideMirce @Erinni15 @barbarab1974 https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Dicembre 2020,brutta cosa l'ignoranza.

@Noga_IHSV @DRobertaLacerda O estudo clínico de fase 3, em relação a eficácia e segurança da Pfizer foi publicado em 31 de dezembro de 2020, cara. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/jGoaGQwTOd Pelo amor de Deus, isso

@BlakeLaPierre @TGasper95 @whstancil I'm not sure what would convince you of the sweep of scientific conversation at the time. If you want to read the paper on the trial of the Pfizer vaccine, that's essentially what it says. https://t.co/K9LYoLHXQP

@ActualKahuna @Bannisterious @PhillyPharmaBoy @Gdixxn21 https://t.co/EAUPOgMJM7 right here