@DeweyMcG @FreedomForMD @unhealthytruth @barnes_law You were literally given full double blind, placebo controlled, randomized peer reviewed clinical studies in the most respected medical journal in the world. What are you talking about? https://t.co/Op
@Woodynist @PlumePatria @lonnibesancon Les études ont été publiées il y a maintenant 26 mois et vous n'avez toujours pas découvert que c'était des RCT ? On va être gentil, supposé que c'est par bêtise et vous donner une source https://t.co/i65YIs6KwQ
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
@LongLester @HeyNurseKat @jonathanstea Here are 3 that were done before the vaccine was approved. https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
@eliyanavd @_Kodos_ @mcbyrne @Chikagirl You should be able to google them. For example, https://t.co/wMs1M2yL4N with many analyses thereof like https://t.co/tSjy1yFl79
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fer…
12/ #Pfizer/#BioNTech im Rahmen der Zulassungsstudie ab 16 Jahren erlitten hatte. Auch dessen damaliger Studienchef (Fernando POLACK) ist Erstautor der weltweiten Phase-3-Zulassungsstudie vom Dezember 2020, ebenso publiziert im #NEJM. https://t.co/yiqC9Nd
@Boomingbox If you have the time then read this - https://t.co/CixVnk1ed3...... would you then advise me to NOT be vaccinated? And where are you getting your figures from? Some evidence would be useful.
@Fabio52948502 @DrPaoloMezzana https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Coglione,già a Dicembre 2020 si sapeva che la protezione da contagio era del 94%,scesa al 62% con le Omicron.
@WashupCyclone Not for nothing, we did have some randomized trials. https://t.co/VYNdK9bpjR
@zenqvist Tässä sen viimeisin väittämä, kuva ja linkki artikkeliin, katsokaa sivu 3, siellä ei puhuta sanaakaan tällaisista 'placeboista' (jotka itseasiassa ovat rokotteissa käytettyjä adjuvantteja) vaikka botti toistuvasti näin väittää https://t.co/riB4
@ChatGPTBot @a_nineties @AldousLeary @BjoernBlumberg @prof_freedom @TLAVagabond To make it easier for others to reach the document, here's a clickable link: https://t.co/riB4uVl5JC
@ChatGPTBot @a_nineties @AldousLeary @BjoernBlumberg @prof_freedom @TLAVagabond @ChatGPTBot Please provide a citation for your statement that other placebo treatments besides saline were used in C4591001 (such as polysorbate 80) from the article you're r
@AdaJakobsthal @ZiggyStard21st https://t.co/HZuld3Mqd1 Die meine ich (warum auch immer da jetzt 31.12.20 steht). Ein paar unge💉 mehr hatten leichte Symptome und wurden daher getestet. Keine Aussagen zu schweren Verläufen oder Ansteckung. Aufgrund von letz
@TaylorWDobbins @510Metroid @DrLoupis it's not like you would comprehend any of the work scientists have done to develop a vaccine anyways lol - https://t.co/gYbwDJtCFb - https://t.co/ujUWixtqgF - https://t.co/4Hvyd7PrPJ
@Swindaddy2 @RWMaloneMD Wrong! It was tested, like all other vaccines, in a phase III trial with 45.000 volunteers. The endpoint was symptomatic COVID. Reduction after vaccination: 95%. Reduction in virus transmission: no tested. https://t.co/Le8WhdSBSN
@brigles2 @Rocketman2141 @LiedSuddenly @DrSusanOliver1 @Sharky_vs_Evil @ButHisEmails @thevegdoc @thesassymicrobe @dr_jon_l @thereal_truther @EveInOz @IvorMectin1 I’m starting to get the feeling it’s not about the vaccine itself for you. I think you have a
RT @ScienceBlog3: Think about this in context of the 3.3% as if we had given everyone in the U.S. the Pfizer 💉vaccine? For just one of the…
RT @ScienceBlog3: Think about this in context of the 3.3% as if we had given everyone in the U.S. the Pfizer 💉vaccine? For just one of the…
Think about this in context of the 3.3% as if we had given everyone in the U.S. the Pfizer 💉vaccine? For just one of the potential Long-Term risks of the mRNA💉vaccine, that could be around 9.999 million people. It was & still IS experimental medicine
@RB84509962 @CaulfieldTim @factaotearoa @NBCNews This one? There are more, of course. https://t.co/kSvuskFJ0S
@maxbart99 @WhiteHouse Also yes there are numerous published results of completed trials. Here’s one, there are many more. https://t.co/npHadng9Ty
@Troll_Troll4Fun @HealthAnthony @jaymem16560813 @DrAseemMalhotra @Kevin_McKernan You’ve asked me no such thing that I recall I will direct you the the following to start: https://t.co/y69ZPV8G8P
@domiASL @Larrytheblueb @DmtEvelyne Il suffisait de savoir lire. Voilà qui nous prouve que, comme tous les antivax, tu n'as rien "cherché par toi-même", tu n'as vérifié aucune des infos que tu balances. Tu es à la ramasse sur le sujet, tu répètes juste bêt
@ToKnowOrNot Daar is geen bewijs voor, in de trial van Pfizer zelf stierven voor elke covid dode minder 7 mensen door overige oorzaken (20 doden waarvan 1 covid vs 14 doden waarvan 2 covid) https://t.co/vCPBQD7sIX
War als allgemeines Phänomen schon aus der BioNTech/Pfizer-Studie bekannt. Wahrscheinlich ein Phänomen der Immunoseneszenz: Ältere reagieren auf Immunintervention oft schwächer als Jüngere. https://t.co/Ha1NChRSes https://t.co/AM1zTGofPB
@KamelNutrition @bava23 The phonies at New England Journal of Mediocrity. https://t.co/IBk4mmwJsL
@SenseurFR Vous parlez de cette étude ? https://t.co/l14Ye6CpiL
@Vicky12882610 @MeliR143 @Savge75 @mb_jfb @ecodesign1776 @AHart1974 @zismo64 @elonmusk https://t.co/k1Bf9kYM2O Well that was easy. Also, the vaccine for covid was developed from existing technology, including an in-progress one for SARS (Because it's a v
🤔
RT @Marc_Veld: In short: it deals with the clinical trial phase 3 results as reported here. The trial began July 27, 2020 and completed enr…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
@JuseSedd @Hayekolyte @IanCopeland5 Here it is mate! Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/h8QLNyDlnC Keep in mind that its all own internal pfizer paper written entirely by their employees about their own product. https:
RT @Marc_Veld: In short: it deals with the clinical trial phase 3 results as reported here. The trial began July 27, 2020 and completed enr…
In short: it deals with the clinical trial phase 3 results as reported here. The trial began July 27, 2020 and completed enrollment of 46,331 participants in January 2021. End points, previously agreed with the FDA, were reached on November 18, 2020. http
RT @EphemeralEther: I see a lot of frustration going around vis-à-vis kids vax, so I feel it is important to remind ourselves how we got he…
@5shezz4 @lovethepump2 @N04724510 @ABridgen Easy. Now you show me how it's ineffective. https://t.co/gKRVSMhzuV
RT @StimmederVernu9: Das Preprint von Doshi et al. stellt anhand der RCT-Daten die bisherigen Risiko-Nutzen-Annahmen zum #Pfizer -Impfstoff…
@phenominalebe @JLdBnl @VermeulenHellen @SigridKaag 40.000? Nog dommer. Van de 43.448 proefpersonen overleden er 6 tijdens de duur van de studie, waarvan 4 een placebo kregen. Allen overleden duidelijk aan een andere oorzaak dan het vaccin. Hier: https:
@AmlieCHAMPAGNE3 @ScienceParle_SW @lonnibesancon @ClaudeSteve6 Le vaccin ? Il y en a plusieurs de chaque type même en déc 2020 ça part mal. Imposé ? Bah du coup non, il y en a plusieurs autres selon les pays, bref. 4 en France au départ, désormais 6 je cro
@arbour4590 @ClassicalMann @DrAseemMalhotra Here’s the analysis. The NEJM is very prestigious, by the way. You can read the whole thing, but the abstract tells the story in a very concise way. Have you seen this peer reviewed journal article before? It’s v
@jlemay78 @IsaiahLCarter @NBCNews They never worked as well as they told us….
THREAD 👇👇👇
RT @EphemeralEther: I see a lot of frustration going around vis-à-vis kids vax, so I feel it is important to remind ourselves how we got he…
@LoriMills4CA42 @RoxanneHoge @cliftonaduncan How can you be this poorly informed and take such a strong stance on this matter? I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. https://t.co/c0kDr6J0Cg
@SmithJane007 @H802S @DrEliDavid https://t.co/igGhyD3RF2 Here is a paper on mask wearing and reduction in transmission Here is a paper on the efficiency of the mRNA vaccine https://t.co/m4uuK7EBht Better to get a vaccine then risk it with COVID as stated i
RT @jimearl666: @jvgraz @Ahlibobwa26 @jimmy_dore Efficacy at the time of this study was 95% against infection. Naturally, as new variants e…
@jvgraz @Ahlibobwa26 @jimmy_dore Efficacy at the time of this study was 95% against infection. Naturally, as new variants emerge, efficacy will decrease. That’s what happens with vaccines. https://t.co/lIAuu9DCcx
@WhiteCrowRN @Wendyz223 @cliftonaduncan Here's part of it: https://t.co/Z6ANpZE09E There's more in the nationwide statistics.
@Wendyz223 @cliftonaduncan Also, here's some data: https://t.co/Z6ANpZE09E
Buenos Airesの研究責任者で第3相研究筆頭著者 https://t.co/bzn55p1EkQ Fernando Polack M.Dの弁護士がRoux資料閲覧 ⇨極めて重要な研究論文に掲載されず Rouxは両側肺炎で入院していると研究teamに知らせた 💉と何も関係ない?コロナ感染? PCRでコロナ陰性とtestしたという言葉ではない 訴訟?
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @laszlohealth: Und wer dir Details zu meinem vorherigen Tweet genauer nachlesen will: Hier 👇🏽ein hervorragender Thread von @StimmederVer…
@Sparkle70789378 @SpringSteps @cliftonaduncan I don't see you providing an information. But I guess I didn't either, in this part of this thread. So let's fix that: https://t.co/Z6ANpZE09E
@CastorT26371809 That's nice, non-expert vaccine denialist + sealion. The points were already covered, regardless of how much your paranoia + sealioning lead you to pretend otherwise. So going to ignore your evidence-free conspiracism now. 🙂 https://t.c
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @StimmederVernu9: Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zu…
RT @EphemeralEther: I see a lot of frustration going around vis-à-vis kids vax, so I feel it is important to remind ourselves how we got he…
Und wer dir Details zu meinem vorherigen Tweet genauer nachlesen will: Hier 👇🏽ein hervorragender Thread von @StimmederVernu9!
RT @EphemeralEther: I see a lot of frustration going around vis-à-vis kids vax, so I feel it is important to remind ourselves how we got he…
Aus aktuellem Anlass verweise ich auf einen früheren Thread von mir, in dem es um die vielen Unregelmäßigkeiten der Zulassungsstudie geht. #mRNA #Impfung #Pfizer #Biontech https://t.co/1N9TPjNR3w
@beachbum_gamer @G_Nat31 Also: https://t.co/9INqJOVfbA https://t.co/DJh6IQGS92 New England Journal is peer-reviewed... That's their publication process. New England Journal was at least THREE of the articles that were present in one of my various evidenc
@AleProOli77 @danielcfabri @JanainaDoBrasil @tarcisiogdf 2 revistas acadêmicas do Reino Unido: https://t.co/6W8ZxtBMRU https://t.co/Hq1Hxl76of 1 revista acadêmica dos EUA (Yale): https://t.co/ppbviU5USO 1 revista da Alemanha: https://t.co/uBuNK27iMt Fiocru
@editsxjames @goddeketal Re side effects: https://t.co/7HHN3r3cY0
@RB84509962 @dr_jon_l Here's the placebo controlled RCT: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@ImmortelleXIII @PatriciaImmo @silvano_trotta Ben si. À moins que vous n'ayiez une autre source. Mais comme vous préférez m'insulter... https://t.co/tT3ULGioYt
@TheLiamSturgess @JesslovesMJK The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, also known as the BNT162b2 vaccine, has demonstrated an efficacy rate of 95% in preventing COVID-19 infection in people aged 16 years and older. The vaccine requires two doses administered 21 days
@Arizona_LP @LPMississippi @LPCO To be clear, OP is claiming that the vaccines “were never tested” and that promoting vaccination is a government psyop. Here is proof that the vaccines were in fact tested.
@LPCO Plenty of private sector studies out there too.
@LPCO If those sample sizes aren’t big enough for you here’s a study that had an n of 43,548. https://t.co/pSXEbbfoXf
@SynthIge @goddeketal @pfizer @NEJM " The Pfizer trial in adults shows the vaccine kills 3 people by causing cardiac arrest" is another false claim. No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. https://t.co/5Z
@7sealshortime @i_am_joli_anne @24Kirsten @greg_price11 @RepMTG You should stop speaking in absolutes. It makes you look immature. While not the goal of this study, you can see distribution and clearance https://t.co/Ymcs4S3jQj
@TradingwithPhil @The_Real_Fly Here's the due diligence: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@jtnrmom @ChairHead2 @srbehrens @SteveDeaceShow Here's the scientific literature: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@jtnrmom @srbehrens @SteveDeaceShow Here's the study: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@kjbuys13 @callanswag2 @TomElliottUKNo1 @PedsGeekMD @DrLoupis 8 mice, 43,000 people... https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN https://t.co/iDKT50JN01
@barranaiek @BenitoFrazzetta @Stefano0323 @Bonnie_369 @RoyDeVita @ALBERTOSEVERIN7 https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB 95% fino alla Delta, 62% con le Omicron.
@LammiLaura22 @jyrkikononen Miksinolisi pitänyt? Kun lähtökohtaisesti ei ole ollut enää kokeellinen. Faasin 3 tulokset julkaistu ennen hötäluvan tai ehdollisen myyntiluvan saamista. Vertaisarvioituna. Tässä Pfizerin. Joulukuun 2020 alkupuolelta. ht