Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

@goddeketal Here is a so-called “scientist” blocking a real scientist because he doesn’t like having his lies exposed. Go figure. #VaccinesWork, with reference. https://t.co/rp4u2iC5va

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

@CBarronie @boomsmackrecord @chrischirp So you can't answer any of my 4 points. You are wrong: "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6)" so statistically significant. https://t.co/SPokb76u23

Your definition of low is 1223 DEATHS, 42,086 case reports of Adverse Events with 158,893 different types in nearly all the participants in the study & 11,361 NOT Recovered participants with 9,400 Unknown outcomes. If that’s your definition of safe you

@smartnootropics @goddeketal https://t.co/vhuFwldnl6

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

@libyourbestlife @benshapiro Do you know that even in Pfizer own RCT, MORE total people died in the vax group than in the non-vax group (4 extra deaths in the vax group from heart related issues)? Was that information shared with the public? Do you think

知ったかは、要らない。 確認されてる。お前、本当にバカだな。 お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc

@Wozza777 @Checkmate__2020 @healthbyjames You are embarrassing yourself. https://t.co/JKUdoAeNdp

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

@jonrice1 @dave43law @ABridgen Fake news. Here is the direct link to NEJM and what it says about the vaccine. https://t.co/M2btibyTLB

@cryptolady67 @Maxim_Holt Clinical trials van Pfizer. Afgerond in november 2020: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R

@tom_anticomm @stkirsch Doctors had efficacy data like Pfizer's phase 3 RCT paper which anyone could have gone and read any time after it was published https://t.co/BrzvU4lgrC

@stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventing covid-19 and low adverse events similar to placebo? https://t.co/BrzvU4lgrC

@staceylmayo @NBSaphierMD https://t.co/CzpJIx7kOF

@wtrbfflo @NBSaphierMD You must have missed the studies - here is the seminal study which lead to the vaccine FDA approval of the BioNTech/Pfizer joint vaccine… https://t.co/CzpJIx7kOF

@warrickfraser @DevilWearsMAGA @mikeinmarlton @nLyte2 @boaz_eric @catturd2 It was the FOI request which was going to take decades. Absolutely nothing to do with Pfizer. The results from the trials were released in 2020: https://t.co/7xlE2koMeF You’re bei

@JustinVillemure @MichaelVSmith7 @healthbyjames I’ve backed up my claims with sources. If you want to continue talking show yours. I dare you. https://t.co/tK29nrOgOY

@JustinVillemure @Trumpesantis @MichaelVSmith7 @healthbyjames @IanCopeland5 🤣 here you go. Proof your phase 3 is ongoing statement is inaccurate. https://t.co/tK29nrOgOY

@laylag2 لازم نفرق بين preventing disease و preventing transmission دراسة المرحلة الثالثة كانت مصممة لمعرفة ما إذا اللقاح يمنع الإصابة preventing disease و كانت الفعالية ٩٥٪ و لم تكن مصممة لمعرفة prevention of transmission هذه الدراسات جاءت لاحقاً http

@a_solveig96 @TracyBethHoeg The paper CLEARLY SHOWS the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual getting symptoms or severe disease. & your threat is duly rec

@judgeschmails @goddeketal Keep up!

@AvoquaD @arikouts @Ex_infirmier @AgretDenis Conclusion le 10 décembre 2020 en 3 mois d'étude: efficacité: 95%. https://t.co/m5RtP5aQes

RT @basemstat: @alhunayan من جدك دكتور دراسة على الحيوانات ثلاث مراحل دراسية على البشر دراسة المرحلة الثالثة فيها ٤٤ ألف مشارك و خضعت للمرا…

@alhunayan من جدك دكتور دراسة على الحيوانات ثلاث مراحل دراسية على البشر دراسة المرحلة الثالثة فيها ٤٤ ألف مشارك و خضعت للمراجعة و التدقيق Peer review و تم نشرها في مجلة NEJM و بعدها إعتماد طارئ و بعدها إعتماد كلي يعني معقولة كل هذا ما صار !!! https://t.

@KerryOLeary4 @healthbyjames Please highlight on the paper where this is said? https://t.co/y69ZPV8G8P

@Allisonb1 @BradClugston @PatrickGman @healthbyjames No I’m referring to the Phase 3 trial data published in the New England Journal of medicine. https://t.co/bXmsZkJWnD

@Chris93254924 @mikenike1290 @lesoleildeqc https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij C’est quoi ça si c’est pas la phase 3 🤔

@dttpeople @IanCopeland5 @unhealthytruth There are important differences between “population at large” studies and clinical trials. Both are useful. For your vaccination safety and efficacy concerns where the requested info is mostly known: https://t.co/jP

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

@FuriousDmac @focusingman Correct. Note, too, that mRNA vaccine safety was assessed in 10's of thousands of individuals over a six-month timeframe. See below for BNT162b2 example. https://t.co/RFRus9VK9w

@Enix_Moon_ @catturd2 The vaccine WAS tested. Thoroughly. See the study linked below. Not only that, but we have a vast amount of data on outcomes, so we KNOW it's extremely safe. Your news is lying to you. Flat out lying. Read more widely please. https

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…

RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…

RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…

@JapanSenelar @lonnibesancon Je vous ai donné le lien : https://t.co/msdaCdduaE Non il n'y a pas en double aveugle. Oui un test pas comme ceux de Raoult. Je suis d'accord avec vous

RT @Wide9Giants: @IanCopeland5 @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @horseivermectin @stkirsch why didn’t this study show increase in deat…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

@NikoandOkin @sarahbosetti Hier die Zulassungsstudie: https://t.co/QyWEgTYy1c Auch in der Packungsbeilage wird heute noch eine Wirksamkeit von 95% behauptet: https://t.co/ThcGCEzBEs https://t.co/HNs7Q3nK4s

@JapanSenelar @lonnibesancon Déduction ? https://t.co/msdaCdcWl6 Depuis le temps vous avez dû la lire. Il y a celle aussi de moderna si vous voulez. Mais comme vous avez l'air d'aimer plus Pfizer

@JustDaweed @goddeketal Fair point. Here you go then to get you started. https://t.co/rp4u2iCDkI

#COVID19 #FreeSpeech #vaccines Problems continue. We still don't have the outcome measure we need

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

@FDjelama @f_philippot https://t.co/wmTClxmNyo

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…

@19David19David @5Medabdallah @MichelleTouss32 https://t.co/hqgB1w5azc

2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/0Duw6hrPyW

@Trumpsfield @AnnalenaLogopae Die erste Phase-III-Studie zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit wurde bereits 2020 publiziert. https://t.co/l6yMcCLnxU

@telesynth_hot @Navarp @outfielding @MeanderingRhode @shmuelcshapira Years of testing? - it’s completed all the testing any other vaccine does. The stages where done concurrently not sequentially, hence the speed! No paper? - https://t.co/1h3kQjXO1C @Na

@boriquagato Also, simply read that first study that claimed 95% efficacy & led to the EUA. Most of the "believers" were satisfied with MSM headlines. If they would have read the paper, even without any medical background, common sense would have pre

@Aaaaa1985ttt まず反ワクチンの時点でお察しw 致死率こそインフル並みになったといえ後遺症が高い確率で出て長続きするんだよw ここで学業に支障を来したらお先真っ暗だよ？倦怠感も程度次第じゃ動けなくなるし対策しなきゃw 東京都保険福祉局https://t.co/df0lIfRIDg https://t.co/hHHCJY1q2f

@Troyocto @ehnyay @denise_dewald Ahem

@gohawks789 @goc1978 @vancemurphy It was tested. Here's the original study, released the month before it was approved. Note that they never claimed it stopped asymptomatic transmission (in the "Discussion" section) https://t.co/P0xMo1xgQb

@VaxFreeSperm @ElenaTh5 @TerriMccarter4 @Jamesdtweets2 @RWMaloneMD Being from the UK makes me less true. https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@sourcesorgtfo @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@SallyVanhandel @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@b_truji @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie Easy. https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@LisaWinks13 @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@PampireRN @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@STROHFLOW @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN

@DefendamosCR @losIgnorantestv https://t.co/He9ivrqDKD

@LelenaPeacock @jvgraz @RealSteveCox @twittposter @lmcsomewhere @RogerAramayo2 @jimmy_dore Here's the RCT for Pfizer/BioNTech. https://t.co/8cWQVACyyU

@Leon1969 @ThomasInLeiden @SeKuRiGo @28111970jef @OmroepOn Zal je iets specifieker moeten zijn over waar je je informatie vandaan haalt. Als je kijkt naar de trials (bijv. https://t.co/2DOUV2MgOW) wordt voor bijwerkingen écht geteld vanaf moment van inje

@Myclops2 @ABridgen https://t.co/BVKAtAAvNd

Funding and Disclosures Supported by BioNTech and Pfizer.

@IanCopeland5 @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @horseivermectin @stkirsch why didn’t this study show increase in death in vaccine if your amazing totally valid survey “study” of ratios showed increased death https://t.co/Ke31qc5eQW

RT @MannicheVibeke: I didn´t get vaccinated because I was NEVER afraid of COVID-19. Also the small study which gave Pfizer access to the wo…

@CiervosComunis1 @YoDecido20 @jmjmoragas @Hondontown @balkraix @esCesarVidal @JavierVillamor @ChakNorris93 @aflorrick77 Lo prioritario era reducir la gravedad y las muertes. Y eso es normal. Y eso lo pone bien claro para cualquiera que tenga ojos en la car

@okiefromtexas42 @goddeketal https://t.co/rp4u2iCDkI Gold standard RCT, done at pace.

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

@UndercoverFBI9 @HeyNurseKat @MichellePeterNP @healthbyjames 2/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

RT @PBasiukiewicz: Jeśli sztandarowego powikłania NIE WIDAĆ w oryginalnych trajalach, zaś wychodzi ono dopiero po wielu miesiącach przypadk…

@SlayerOfMatrix1 @drdrew @delbigtree @AskDrDrew https://t.co/zXpsYh4Kbf

RT @IamBrookJackson: @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/atOvquQSkd First author is Fernando Polack, PI at the Argentine sites 1231/4444. Second aut…

@steve63787014 @Mogan95645839 @DataMindful @TheEconomist Suddenly you want to seem them, over two years later. How knowledgeable are you about assessing trial data? Pfizer: https://t.co/R1YnnOUuqk

@Didtheearthmov1 @OnThePisa @Johnincarlisle @YouTube Ah some random anti-vax screenshot. Well that’s me convinced !! 🤣🤣🤣 Meanwhile back in reality here’s the actual clinical trail data (sweety 😆) https://t.co/Yj6MYd6XT0

I didn´t get vaccinated because I was NEVER afraid of COVID-19. Also the small study which gave Pfizer access to the worlds blindfolded trust included 21.720 mainly healthy persons & followed approx 2 months. It was worrying and crazy. If you forgot..

@AdamKMaine How does this happen? How do we go this long and THIS IS THE FIRST time you are seeing these: https://t.co/OpexaXNi1s

？？ 出遅れすぎですね。

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…

RT @Black_Crow_: 拡散希望 現実見れない政治家に専門家と日本人が多い事実 今の日本の現実‼ マスク着用率世界一 ワクチン接種率世界一 コロナ感染者どんどん増える なんでなんやろ ちゃんと教えて 知らんけど #コロナをインフルエンザ等感染症から外せ #河野太郎の更…

@CalriCarlos @MSPUruguay @JoseSatdjian @DrDanielSalinas Pelotudo. Un adulto que se presenta voluntariamente a darse una vacuna per se ya está dando su consentimiento. Y sos tan burro que desconoces que la fase 3 de las vacunas terminó hace más de 2 años y

RT @PBasiukiewicz: Jeśli sztandarowego powikłania NIE WIDAĆ w oryginalnych trajalach, zaś wychodzi ono dopiero po wielu miesiącach przypadk…

RT @IamBrookJackson: @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/atOvquQSkd First author is Fernando Polack, PI at the Argentine sites 1231/4444. Second aut…

RT @IamBrookJackson: @IanCopeland5 https://t.co/atOvquQSkd First author is Fernando Polack, PI at the Argentine sites 1231/4444. Second aut…

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…