Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

RT @ClareCraigPath: This makes no sense. The protocol was for: 1st dose at enrollment 2nd dose, 3 weeks later. So to have 2 months foll…

RT @ClareCraigPath: This makes no sense. The protocol was for: 1st dose at enrollment 2nd dose, 3 weeks later. So to have 2 months foll…

RT @ClareCraigPath: This makes no sense. The protocol was for: 1st dose at enrollment 2nd dose, 3 weeks later. So to have 2 months foll…

RT @ClareCraigPath: This makes no sense. The protocol was for: 1st dose at enrollment 2nd dose, 3 weeks later. So to have 2 months foll…

This makes no sense. The protocol was for: 1st dose at enrollment 2nd dose, 3 weeks later. So to have 2 months follow up after the second dose would mean being recruited more than 11 weeks earlier i.e. on or before 24th July 2020. https://t.co/ZOnorrIS

@mp_mjp https://t.co/cFRD8f3EVa

RT @SwaledaleMutton: @Bitcorneeee @MichelleDewbs No. It is not scientific data. It is submission documents. You have obviously never wor…

@Seahawkscrazy @A_A_ronWOOPIG78 "Two BNT162b2 recipients died (one from arteriosclerosis, one from cardiac arrest), as did four placebo recipients (two from unknown causes, one from hemorrhagic stroke, and one from myocardial infarction). " https://t.co/z

@donnedwards @nicd_sa It was published in Dec 2020 https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe

@Lspjerem @RogerChampagne4 C'est là que tout réside. Il y a 2 façon de comparer. Faire un rapport (RRR) et une différence (RRA). Si vous voulez vous amuser voici la première étude pfizer faite par pfizer sur l'infection : https://t.co/3R9wDQdJtG

@Bitcorneeee @MichelleDewbs No. It is not scientific data. It is submission documents. You have obviously never worked on any clinical trials. They produce vast mountains of paperwork, and a very small amount of actual data. Here is the pfizer data: ht

@naukaetop @deadwronger @Giotto_mkd Ај ова ако сакате на кратко пошо глеам се разбирате https://t.co/sjPh0aRi5D

@cyberruk @trackhawk_2018 @JustinTrudeau @SakshamSulove Like, the fact that you are demanding evidence that is SUPER easy to find proves that you do literally no research whatsoever, and just parrot other antivaxxers. https://t.co/zc9z2jgpgC https://t.co

RT @ConservaVixen7: That's a HUGE number of docs, WoW, @sirtatters! Of course, I start "webbing" and that leads me from one report to the…

That's a HUGE number of docs, WoW, @sirtatters! Of course, I start "webbing" and that leads me from one report to the next... Wee bit of interesting, here: https://t.co/7SaLVQoOYE

RT @captainwonkish: @john81393959 @sweetkeet https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl https://t.co/idiuoP4tqK That blurry screenshot just shows how you go…

@TimRunsHisMouth See below: https://t.co/KHCqYQ2uas https://t.co/xd5mxdH9gs I'm sure some of you will contend that the "New England Journal of Medicine" is somehow unreliable data because doesn't confirm your bias.

@lknur39609929 @dr_phototherapy Faz deneyleri dünyaya uygulanmadı , klinik çalışmalardaki 43000 gönüllüye uygulandı. https://t.co/sfzIZKcicw Faydaları / yan etkilerden ağır bastı . %95 etkili bulundu ve çalışma hakemli dergilerde yayınlandı. ( Bu çok daha

@ohloul @Myelinenet @curieuxdenice @SummerOfSoul69 @Dchrist97799688 @veig29 @BonsensOrg Oui c'est ce qu'il y a dans l'étude publiée depuis plus d'un an https://t.co/kYYLcuEGjf

@john81393959 @sweetkeet https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl https://t.co/idiuoP4tqK That blurry screenshot just shows how you got tricked by the base rate fallacy: https://t.co/DkW7uKDE63

@JosephZaken @juju33310 @RogerChampagne4 Voici la première étude sur l'infection du produit pfizer par pfizer : https://t.co/3R9wDQdJtG placebo : 162 infectés / 21728 = 0,74558% vaccin : 8 infectés / 21720 = 0,03683 % RRR = (0,74558-0,03683) / 0,74558 = 0,

RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…

@KrisKirk2 @MichelleDewbs If you read the clinical trial publications, example below is for pFizer. You will see it says the vaccine prevents covid in 95%, which as we know now was either wholly inaccurate, false, a mistake or a blatant deception regarding

@Frida03126587 https://t.co/IVmlisdGqO

RT @WRhetorix: @TreenityWeb @TwinLuck @Drmartyufml La première publi de Pfizer datait de décembre 2020 et annonçait 95% de protection contr…

@Jaaaine @saracenrush @TheoFleury14 Wow. That's the Pfizer trial data. https://t.co/w7HOVSJ730

@jazwidz @austin_smyth90 @neil2k18 @john81393959 it is not a false statement... in the trial, 2 people in the vaccine arm died and 4 people in the placebo arm died. https://t.co/zXpsYhlNdf https://t.co/Jwew6ttio2

@Darb_Rabor @TheoFleury14 I didn't fully notice how dumb your tweet was until it came back around. The FOI is about the post-trial approval submission. The trial data was released early 2021. Pfizer: https://t.co/Jm64MAgmPJ Moderna: https://t.co/MySi1Fp

https://t.co/ahc1iQyYMr If anyone wants a summary of the 80K pages of the Pfizer docs published yesterday, here it is. A summary of the clinical trial data published 18 months ago.

@Nouri_Larelle @Liek43 @hapelensrob Pfizer studie: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk Prizer studie onder kinderen, als onderdeel van eisen CMA: https://t.co/f5nuBsDKaX Veiligheid vaccins na 68.000 vaccins, en 68.000 placebo's: https://t.co/x5Tmprf6wN

@VanSophia @Whataboutthat9 @LeeC2030 @john81393959 Aside from how you're still refusing to answer my question about whether you think live attenuated vaccines are safe, everything you just said is totally false, including the absurd claim that studies test

@DTzvetkovsky @LeeC2030 @john81393959 To be clear, the results were released in December 2020: https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl

RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…

@iain_cooke @GaredHunt @massbless @ebennett74 You must be kidding. Most clinical trials are against placebo. Here is a reference to one of the Pfizer covid trials, where half of the participants received placebo: https://t.co/kX5NhRD1XD

@BrautigamRoland [5/n]5. Both safety and efficacy of Pfizer vaccine:https://t.co/rmQ6D2HO5z 6.Scientific study to the effectiveness and safety of coronaviruses in real world data: https://t.co/7HidAaP7Hg 7. Retrospective study of the safety and efficacy o

@Crilljin @MdBreathe https://t.co/eUn8ho0NzC

@DOGEANATOR @NNation37 @Truth_in_Number @andrew7rd @peekoil00 @JayHill223 @2_patriot17 @areyouawakeyet1 @oXMrsWarriorXo @Guern20 @NicoleSirotek No, phase 3 clinical trials were completed in November 2020, and the results of the trial were published in Dece

@artriple @Malola66505808 @AJKole1 @the_stinging https://t.co/wBalIQIw5a

@AvaBonum @PeterDeRoover1 @elsvandoesburg Aankondiging afronding testfase Pfizer: https://t.co/S7bzgR4XMc Afgeronde fase3 studie van Pfizer: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk Goedkeuring op basis hiervan: https://t.co/HtC67wzZYR Kan jij me vertellen wat hier leug

@robertopaulos85 @GBNEWS @mattletiss7 According to the tests and trials that have been happening all around the world for two years. For example: https://t.co/0Rg6AgyVs0

RT @ArtysHouse: @MrAntiWoke @Jaisans @DelusionsMass @Trumpbangskids @ChrisBBacon3 @JonRFleming @fishyfish67 @David4677484957 @ALefty123 @Vi…

@MrAntiWoke @Jaisans @DelusionsMass @Trumpbangskids @ChrisBBacon3 @JonRFleming @fishyfish67 @David4677484957 @ALefty123 @VictorJennpaul @glinch72 @JohnOz1900 @6lennybravo @MinnesotaExpat @cbeckj @Lorrilala @Alfred_StatesX @Neilcharles1450 @aSinister @girl_

@Gabriel_ramosfg @pedrostrader Poxa goku. N tá sabendo n. Faz o seguinte, leia o artigo e se tiver dúvida estarei por aqui. https://t.co/fwvfdWFQa9

@knotalike Its not still in clinical trials. Pfizer completed clinical trials in November 2020. They published these results in December 2020. https://t.co/J9boMAOrpm(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.

@k_osieglewski @WyrzykowskiP @SebRoss4 @GrzegorzBraun_ @H_Boczek @PiotrWitczak_ @OrdoMedicus @drZHalat @szczepienie @mikolaj_kam @bfialek Nie ty nie czekasz ty publikujesz gówna bez żadnej wiedzy. To co wkleiłeś to badanie dodatkowej dawki bądź bostera a

@ivettemik @GaryProudDad1 @MdBreathe @pfizer No, phase 3 clinical trials were completed in November 2020, they published the results in December 2020. https://t.co/J9boMAOrpm(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.

@Marv382 @AliNeitzelMD @DrJBhattacharya @Covid19Critical @PierreKory @UnityProjectUSA @P_McCulloughMD can you point me to the made up data in, say, the Pfizer trial? here’s the NJEM article - just let me know which data was faked and how you know: https://

@mattmua72 @VictorianCHO https://t.co/LUPdI3YAK8 https://t.co/BZB7IJhJfY

@Zenon71647295 @Davidbof @Cryptaurelius @Xof3 @VLautard @MartinZ_uncut @marc_g_wathelet Je ne suis pas certain que cela aille dans le sens de vos phobies ..... https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ

@AHuisein @danvandertuin Hoe kom jij erbij dat Pfizer iets geheim wilde houden? Alle resultaten die nodig zijn voor het beoordelen van de effectiviteit en veiligheid zijn al in 2020 vrijgegeven. https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk De FOIA-verzoeken over de communi

RT @No_big_diehl: @CCCAlliance To save people from digging, here's original Phizer trial: Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19…

RT @ember_november: @Jetjumper @terry_truchan @DaniEll70034977 @tdughamy @Sweatiest_Betty @geoff_buxcey @JustinTrudeau 2/ safety), lowers t…

@MHLWitter ファイザー この研究は2回目投与後2年間、安全性と有効性について被験者を追跡調査するよう設計されるも、ワクチンの有効性を考えると規制当局の承認と公衆衛生当局の推奨後は倫理的・現実的な限界のため能動免疫を与えないプラセボ投与者を2年間も追跡調査する余地はない。 https://t.co/tg2cLjr5TP

RT @lafemme_bambina: Oh boy. From the publisher of Pfizer's safety & efficacy data. https://t.co/sr9ftht9zp + https://t.co/gBgwruYQmt +…

Oh boy. From the publisher of Pfizer's safety & efficacy data. https://t.co/sr9ftht9zp + https://t.co/gBgwruYQmt + https://t.co/gsNKGvBJrz + https://t.co/1nS7hJFJO6

@gadboit @jengleruk @LynseyAnneWhite @tonyjsargeant While the HPV questionnaire things had no control group so couldn't prove anything, if you want data on AEs from thousands of people? Good news, we already have that, complete with a control group and ver

@Tsi5HgGJOU9n4Bz @P8U7LeQSpOgthQt @W9eFWhKClbRKinT モデルナの安全性↓ https://t.co/KMeBNZAVrl ファイザーの追加報告↓ https://t.co/qVPJLgMmG3 ちなみにこれらはモデルナやファイザーとは何の関係もない研究者達が客観的に研究し論文にし査読を通ったもの

@kwanjin54 @EzekielFrezza https://t.co/aMYnmdVjfH

@HispanidadAhora @mastelerillo @aflorrick77 De forma transparente, lo puedes encontrar en el mismo ensayo clínico de fase 3 lo puedes encontrar en Fundings and Disclosure. https://t.co/kKk58Iyu5g

@MrDannyTeal @IainMulady @helenjaneadkins @5shezz4 "Largely untested" 🤣 Just a selection of the trial published work.... Pfizer-BioNTech: https://t.co/9R82DYgtz2 https://t.co/R65rJjDWhY AstraZeneca: https://t.co/oo18fkSn0k https://t.co/OCN5wIZ1ux Mod

RT @mcfunny: @mikipatel94 @Awithonelison @davidmweissman @elonmusk https://t.co/zXpsYhlNdf

@IainMulady @5shezz4 @MrDannyTeal Phase 3 trials data, all long since peer reviewed and published. Pfizer-BioNTech: https://t.co/9R82DYgtz2 https://t.co/R65rJjDWhY AstraZeneca: https://t.co/oo18fkSn0k https://t.co/OCN5wIZ1ux Moderna: https://t.co/y7oq

@Newanda75 @jessejackson @VictorianCHO Pfizer published their trial data in December 2020 https://t.co/J9boMAOrpm(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.

@Heicapa1 @grossgaertner @reitschuster „Bestätigtes Covid-19 wurde nach den Kriterien der Food and Drug Administration (FDA) als das Vorhandensein von mindestens einem der folgenden Symptome definiert: …. https://t.co/5APX3wxIej

@TKCisback @een_been_peter @NLzoeker @grobun Nee, het experiment van Pfizer was in 2020 al afgerond. https://t.co/FhJ6hxyEIE Op basis hiervan werd het vaccin in december 2020 goedgekeurd: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk Dus wie is hier nou naief?

@IsDatEchtZo5 @HanSchilder @Marc_Veld @aveldjesgraaf @HaHaGentherapie Dit is de studie van Pfizer: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk En dit was een van de aanvullende trials: https://t.co/f5nuBsDKaX

@twwpod1 @SamPogono This is phizers clinical trial. This is a screenshot of the video. and a screenshot from the study I agree. The clinical trial is misinformation. https://t.co/rAtyf8RFtB https://t.co/PJsisSAZzJ

@MzJuicyBea @RhetoricalGirl0 From the tweet you replied to 🤷🏻‍♂️

@RhetoricalGirl0 @MzJuicyBea https://t.co/Yr9wxIvwJY 43k trial participants. Two doses of Pfizer vax. 90-97% effective in preventing Covid.

@El_KikitX @XavierLG2 @mraffko @CNEWS https://t.co/lbzSFNlcPV

RT @ehwiskgjydr: ファイザー社「当社のワクチンは95%の有効性です！」 医クラ「すごい！NEJMに載ってるから間違いない！」 これが罷り通ってしまうのがEBM至上主義に陥った臨床医学です。 こんなの科学と呼べますか？件のNEJM論文も批判的に見れば不可解な部分ば…

@mikipatel94 @Awithonelison @davidmweissman @elonmusk https://t.co/zXpsYhlNdf

RT @catmarie1812: Voici le lien où j'ai lu l'étude et que j'ai transmis, c'est en anglais mais si besoin Google traduit: https://t.co/Yx33…

@Qleendert @Buffalo75926587 Doe jij dan ook nog even goed onderzoek? Onderzoek dit. Afgeronde fase3 studie Pfizer https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk Goedkeuring in de EU, NA afronding studie: https://t.co/S7bzgR4XMc Goedkeuringen wereldwijd: https://t.co/WNAN3opG

@Henkiejones @aveldjesgraaf @HaHaGentherapie @rutten_dr @mkeulemans @blckbxnews @trouw Hier: de afgeronde studies van Pfizer: https://t.co/O6CPGG0SXK En de goedkeuring op basis van die studie: https://t.co/HtC67wRAQp En hier de werking, het doet niets me

@jsm2334 @Michigan_Noah @OS51388957 Pfizer recruited participants from July to Nov, 2020. https://t.co/7g85m0iviM Unblinding of participants+vaccination of control group likely happened in December, a very controversial step since vaccines were only broad

@DanIoanMuresan @IainKahne @arikouts @Ilan16ans Si en 2 ans vous n'avez jamais lu ces études, vous n'avez pas les bases pour avoir un avis éclairé sur la vaccination contre le Covid. https://t.co/JfSNzsdcJU https://t.co/jO6BLsqc8c https://t.co/uMA5s7UMt

@Laurie37959556 This was before the vaccine was fully developed. Pfizers safety and efficacy was published in December 2020 https://t.co/J9boMAOrpm(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20efficacy%20greater%20than%2030%25.

@NosretapNiai @theurbanpixie @Bret_Sears I have no idea what your first sentence means. The experts in the area all refer to them as vaccines. Here are the trials for moderna and pfizer. Do you have different test data that shows different results? ht

@zaerk1 @VioletteCrawley @VLautard Les vaccins ont sauvé 9 des 10 personnes qui seraient mortes si non vaccinées. Justification scientifique : https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ

merci Cat, genial

@PascalGana @fannylaurent27 @ansm https://t.co/pyLNHkCDTK https://t.co/NxO7wjqfbM https://t.co/7GVmxI6qWw https://t.co/qcTlDaQjKU https://t.co/o1YLDqp9eF https://t.co/QuWLokTa64 https://t.co/cFqw7hKTky

@TreenityWeb @TwinLuck @Drmartyufml La première publi de Pfizer datait de décembre 2020 et annonçait 95% de protection contre la contamination. Peut-être vrai sur la souche de Wuhan 2020. Faux sur les autres. Source : https://t.co/Dhb1gtfAre

@Zenon71647295 @VLautard Vous pouvez lire plutôt que d'affabuler des conneries. https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ

@NLinUSA95 @RNas71 @PolderPaleo De studiedata uit de in november 2020 afgeronde studie van Pfizer: https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk

@MalukyLuke @MartijnTonies @Ed2Kar @pwrdbyanthony Hier de trial data van Pfizer (die nooit geheim is geweest, maar dat terzijde) https://t.co/O6CPGGiumk 21,720 vaccins, 2 overlijdens. 21,728 placebo's, 4 overlijdens. Dus placebo's zijn dodelijker dan de

@Lieroj @TwiceBaked13 @GarthNorris @HutchElle @johnbwhaley You're right, I was wrong. In December of 2020, the vaccine efficacy rate was 95% according to the New England Journal of Medicine. https://t.co/984J4rhHqO

@FuManch77007424 @elllaurado @KyraShimai @Andreinacer @aflorrick77 Si no han pasado la fase de 3 de ensayos clínicos, que me expliquen por qué están publicados y son de libre acceso los datos del mismo ensayo clínico.⬇️ https://t.co/kKk58Iyu5g

@KyraShimai @elllaurado @Andreinacer @FuManch77007424 @aflorrick77 https://t.co/kKk58Iyu5g Y ya por último, en el caso de Pfizer no es que ya tenga la EUA, es que está totalmente aprobada. https://t.co/nkRGNMBBXj

@wirsch1976 @mercut10 @PeterLu79497233 @Hi_ldegard @artemi_ecrit Welche toxikologische Untersuchungen? Und noch einmal .DU behauptest etwas.. DU musst einen Beleg bringen! https://t.co/yJZyUi7fhe Und da. Die Endpunkte wurden erreicht

@BJJTN68 @NoDenynTruth @bennyjohnson @elonmusk no it doesnt. The trial data shows satety and efficacy https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe

@Mimi_libertad @_MaccaNZ trial data was released Dec 2020, The 95% efficacy was for symptomatic COVID, not infection https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe

@Linnymc3 @annybeav the pfizer phase 3 trial was published in Dec 2020 and is still freely available https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe

@DBanagain If they're "untested", then what's this? https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl

@hesthejudge99 Tested: https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT Approved: https://t.co/kg1ocYRtyp

@toadftm @NewsMuse1 @bobscartoons If they were "completely untested", then what's this then? https://t.co/noVU8gLkJl

@jon_lebar @JReinerMD clearly you dont understand the facts. https://t.co/dEJfb7Pskb

RT @bread_shockpan7: わかりやすいヤツ👇 https://t.co/mARb8Qphod

@ArrestFauxi @TigerlillySusan @Data_logical0 @MonicaGandhi9 @AWokeZombie Not to mention doing studies with a control group, as opposed to just accepting whatever unverified non-controlled claims are submitted to VAERS. https://t.co/fHXe4VdNC6 https://t.co

@Jikkyleaks @villagerssn @Progress2Future @Maples46014332 @gotapoint @amareshskumar @Undergroundcou1 @fynn_fan @MDinCanada @P_McCulloughMD @DrAseemMalhotra @DeinertDoc @yolyabreuh @DraMarPhD @ZelenkoZev @ThingsHiddenn @pts003 @theheartguy2004 @DowdEdward I