| Title |
Early experience of COVID-19 vaccination in adults with systemic rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Vaccine Survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
RMD Open, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001814 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sebastian Eduardo Sattui, Jean W Liew, Kevin Kennedy, Emily Sirotich, Michael Putman, Tarin T Moni, Akpabio Akpabio, Deshiré Alpízar-Rodríguez, Francis Berenbaum, Inita Bulina, Richard Conway, Aman Dev Singh, Eimear Duff, Karen L Durrant, Tamer A Gheita, Catherine L Hill, Richard A Howard, Bimba F Hoyer, Evelyn Hsieh, Lina El Kibbi, Adam Kilian, Alfred Hyoungju Kim, David F L Liew, Chieh Lo, Bruce Miller, Serena Mingolla, Michal Nudel, Candace A Palmerlee, Jasvinder A Singh, Namrata Singh, Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil, John Wallace, Kristen J Young, Suleman Bhana, Wendy Costello, Rebecca Grainger, Pedro M Machado, Philip C Robinson, Paul Sufka, Zachary S Wallace, Jinoos Yazdany, Carly Harrison, Maggie Larché, Mitchell Levine, Gary Foster, Lehana Thabane, Lisa G Rider, Jonathan S Hausmann, Julia F Simard, Jeffrey A Sparks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 20% |
| Mexico | 7 | 11% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 63% |
| Scientists | 17 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 158 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 18% |
| Researcher | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 69 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2022.
All research outputs
#576,184
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from RMD Open
#33
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,890
of 434,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RMD Open
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.