| Title |
The efficacy, challenges, and facilitators of telemedicine in post-treatment cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Oncology, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R.J. Chan, M. Crichton, F. Crawford-Williams, O.A. Agbejule, K. Yu, N.H. Hart, F. de Abreu Alves, F.D. Ashbury, L. Eng, M. Fitch, H. Jain, M. Jefford, D. Klemanski, B. Koczwara, K. Loh, M. Prasad, H. Rugo, E. Soto-Perez-de-Celis, C. van den Hurk, A. Chan, Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Survivorship Study Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 9 | 21% |
| United States | 4 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 19 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 53% |
| Scientists | 13 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 178 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,348,408
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#672
of 7,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,599
of 434,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#14
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.