↓ Skip to main content

Research priorities for an HIV cure: International AIDS Society Global Scientific Strategy 2021

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
217 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Research priorities for an HIV cure: International AIDS Society Global Scientific Strategy 2021
Published in
Nature Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41591-021-01590-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven Deeks, Sharon Lewin, Marein de Jong, Zaza Ndhlovu, Nicolas Chomont, Zabrina Brumme, Kai Deng, Luke Jasenosky, Richard Jefferys, Aurelio Orta-Resendiz, Frank Mardarelli, Monique Nijhuis, Katharine Bar, Bonnie Howell, Alex Schneider, Gabriela Turk, Rose Nabatanzi, Joel Blankson, J. Victor Garcia, Mirko Paiardini, Jan van Lunzen, Christina Antoniadi, Fernanda Heloise Côrtes, Susana Valente, Ole S. Søgaard, Ricardo Sobhie Diaz, Melannie Ott, Richard (Rick) Dunham, Siegfried Schwarze, Santiago Perez Patrigeon, Josephine Nabukenya, Marina Caskey, Beatriz Mothe, Fu Sheng Wang, Sarah Fidler, Devi SenGupta, Stephan Dressler, Mitch Matoga, Hans-Peter Kiem, Pablo Tebas, Cissy Kityo, Boro Dropulic, Michael Louella, Kumitaa Theva Das, Deborah Persaud, Ann Chahroudi, Katherine Luzuriaga, Thanyawee Puthanakit, Jeffrey Safrit, Gaerolwe Masheto, Karine Dubé, Jennifer Power, Jessica Salzwedel, Udom Likhitwonnawut, Jeff Taylor, Oguzhan Latif Nuh, Krista Dong, Edward Nelson Kankaka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 217 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 278 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Master 25 9%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 125 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 136 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#211,769
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#862
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,971
of 520,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#31
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 520,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.