| Title |
Acute ischaemic stroke associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam A Dmytriw, Mahmoud Dibas, Kevin Phan, Aslan Efendizade, Ospel Johanna, Clemens Schirmer, Fabio Settecase, Manraj K S Heran, Anna Luisa Kühn, Ajit S Puri, Bijoy K Menon, Sanjeev Sivakumar, Askan Mowla, Daniel Vela-Duarte, Italo Linfante, Guilherme C Dabus, Robert W Regenhardt, Salvatore D'Amato, Joseph A Rosenthal, Alicia Zha, Nafee Talukder, Sunil A Sheth, Ameer E Hassan, Daniel L Cooke, Lester Y Leung, Adel M Malek, Barbara Voetsch, Siddharth Sehgal, Ajay K Wakhloo, Mayank Goyal, Hannah Wu, Jake Cohen, Sherief Ghozy, David Turkel-Parella, Zerwa Farooq, Justin Vranic, James D Rabinov, Christopher J Stapleton, Ramandeep Minhas, Vinodkumar Velayudhan, Zeshan Ahmed Chaudhry, Andrew Xavier, Maria Bres Bullrich, Sachin Pandey, Luciano A Sposato, Stephen A Johnson, Gaurav Gupta, Priyank Khandelwal, Latisha Ali, David S Liebeskind, Mudassir Farooqui, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Fadi Nahab, Dinesh V Jillella, Karen Chen, Mohammad Ali Aziz-Sultan, Mohamad Abdalkader, Artem Kaliaev, Thanh N Nguyen, Diogo C Haussen, Raul G Nogueira, Israr Ul Haq, Osama O Zaidat, Emma Sanborn, Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi, Aman B Patel, James E Siegler, Ambooj Tiwari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 28% |
| Spain | 6 | 8% |
| Brazil | 5 | 7% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 53 | 70% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#89,460
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#37
of 7,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,957
of 519,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#2
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.