↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Type and Adverse Effects Following Vaccination

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
143 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
Title
Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccine Type and Adverse Effects Following Vaccination
Published in
JAMA Network Open, December 2021
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40364
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis L. Beatty, Noah D. Peyser, Xochitl E. Butcher, Jennifer M. Cocohoba, Feng Lin, Jeffrey E. Olgin, Mark J. Pletcher, Gregory M. Marcus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 224. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#109,959
of 20,056,188 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#547
of 4,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,151
of 318,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#30
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,056,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,946 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 112.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.