@zvonimi24883239 @MarioBojic Inaktivisane vakcine se prave 150+ godina. Vektorske od epidemije ebole u Africi, dizajnirane za brza dejstva poput gedore sa nastavcima. Samo treba dodati šiljak S-proteina. IRNK tehnologija se istražuje od 1961. godine Sve št
@MesaWindisms @CaulfieldTim @MayoClinic Here you go. The Pfizer vaccine trial. The observers and the participants were blinded as to whether the participants were assigned to the placebo or vaccine group. https://t.co/29qaO3ZY8h
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
@jeb_poole @OldGeek9 @tonymac5 @BloodwheelJack I wonder how we get data like this https://t.co/d0dhU44MMx https://t.co/gm4wwcC8Ko
@Roderic13425757 @Lissis29121977 Este es el primer estudio de seguridad y eficacia de las vacunas COVID en ensayos clínicos. Posteriormente hay cientos más en población general. Solo tiene que leerlos. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
@its_our_future3 @DopplerEffect93 @dr_jon_l @naomirwolf Below are the clinical trials, so you can no longer claim that you have 'no idea', unless you choose to lie. I definitely can say that the percentage of people who were vaccinated benefitted from it,
RT @Agroufioun: @fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/…
@jetesdelencre @wargonm @IHU_Marseille Tout a fait. Il a été abondamment publié, notamment ici : https://t.co/5IvWgLYune
@Anti6klon @wargonm @IHU_Marseille Il a bien été expérimenté sur l'animal puis sur l'humain dans des études de phase I à III. La phase III a été publiée dans le New England : https://t.co/5IvWgLYune. Elle est librement consultable. Par définition, un prod
https://t.co/rGiGd3Oidx Using the initial study to advertise a 95% efficacy and launch a mass vaccination campaign can be dangerous and misleading for several reasons: 1. **Limited Scope**: The initial study may have limitations in terms of sample size,
RT @Agroufioun: @fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/…
RT @Agroufioun: @fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/…
@paulwall1133 @jsm2334 @thereal_truther https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt Seems like you didn’t read them. Here is one.
RT @Agroufioun: @fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/…
RT @Agroufioun: @fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/…
@ChrisKobilkeJr @EdtheSock There right here https://t.co/v4o3m8T3WA
@fredvalletoux Pfizer annonce -30% d'efficacité après 2 Boosters par rapport à placebo. Bravo à Mme Perulli ! https://t.co/mxaO2xvXjQ Rapport final https://t.co/x6rATIgpWe 8eme fichier page 132 (en vert les gens du groupe placébo vaccinés en milieu d'essai
@TnAlistair @P_McCulloughMD @US_FDA Too many numbers floating around. https://t.co/QcSUfloCG0 claims six deaths in the Phase 2/3 trial but splits them 2/4 rather than 4/2. It’ll take some time to sort all this out.
RT @carl_jurassic: @krassenstein @1BethDutton Wrong. Here is the Pfizer study. “A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection…
@Aunt_Mill @CityNewsVAN Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the New England Journal of Medicine in Dec
@francois101com @StevePascolo @raoult_didier Les chiffres pour le variant original : https://t.co/OgttQdXCTZ
The endpoint of the study was Covid infection. Full stop. No bullshit weasel wording about immunocompromised people… And the shots sure as sh1t weren’t studied with the “you won’t get de@d!” endpoint.
@krassenstein @1BethDutton Wrong. Here is the Pfizer study. “A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. “ https://t.co/5lTMa6h4JL https://t.co/HqezOpM92f
@CovidConfusion @dr_jon_l @jonathanstea @19joho @Debunk_the_Funk @DrSusanOliver1 @HeyNurseKat @CaulfieldTim @Marc_Veld Here's one of the vaccine trials. https://t.co/29d8ojkCrl
@terftasticwoman @CTVNews 2/ what part of the analysis or methodology is flawed. https://t.co/oncK71gvS6 https://t.co/C3mgIulYlx https://t.co/FtULfFmNSt
@grandpawfloyd1 @MeliR143 @Hypothesis Here is the original publication from December 2020. https://t.co/bWWrMrArbr
@TorySnyc @jsm2334 @MRJenny8675309 @anders_hviid decision made for this world on eight cases. Pathetic. https://t.co/ndkD60a72C
@CuendetV @amine_umlil @SPBROC53 0/12/2020 NEJM "Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine" https://t.co/1ndO4WgpvW
@Capulcu_Orcun @hasantahir1990 @DrOzanUnlu Kardeş kaynağın NTV mi ? %95 etkinlik ilk sonuçlardan biriydi. Faz 3 Kasım 2020'de tamamlandı. Aralık Başı hâkemli dergi Nejm'de basıldı ve Aralık sonu da onaylandı.. https://t.co/2EN680jCtD https://t.co/4vSlC
@alessandro_972 @Max_Palmeri @ScaltritiLab https://t.co/SNk4nLOQiQ 42.000 volontari in tutto il mondo, boccalone nobrain
@IStudiedLaw @Marbles34 So dumb. Thinking you figured out something no scientific sources figured out. Trials were over in December 2020 here are the result. Can you highlight in your link where it says they’re experimental or that trials were not over?
@sam_elect @An7hony331 @HiddenPinky The vaccines went through the same safety testing as every other vaccine. For example, here's a human clinical trial of a COVID vaccine from 2020. https://t.co/A09mpJ2yJY
@sam_elect @Zaphod_2022a @HiddenPinky https://t.co/wFd80ihMs9 what untested vaccine? why do anti-vaxxers not do their research? they want everyone else to do their work for them. lol
@coach28373 @mcfunny @thisisnothappen @davidakirkwood1 @ICanLookThatUp @Awithonelison @kevinault @CarsonMerkwan I can link it again. RFK claimed NONE OF this existed. Yet, here you and I can easily read it. It even mentions the earlier safety profile f
@patriottmom2one @QuietFriendly @WhiteJoshuaL It doesn't matter what I say, you'll never accept any real-world source, but here's an abbreviated list... U Maryland: https://t.co/b2BzlMfwu7 NIH general testing: https://t.co/ZYcXQShmZn NIH clinical trials: h
@HamHead5813 @Debunk_the_Funk these are studies after the initial trials. Yes trials review safety and efficacy concurrently, as clearly stated in the publication You really are totally confused https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@moi_hurtado @ChakNorris93 Esta es tan solo la primera publicación científica sobre seguridad y eficacia de las vacunas. Después de esta hay cientos más. https://t.co/Wvf2Z3gc2q
@quickstics @DrSuneelDhand The Pfizer trial showed 95% efficacy. Read it here: https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@VcastV @pensamientcrit Hay cientos de ellas . Le aporto los resultados de seguridad y eficacia de los ensayos clínicos tras los cuales hay cientos más en sectores de edad y población variada. Espero luego los suyos que demuestren las muertes provocadas po
@The_Real_Ref @robyperanibg72 @Max_Palmeri No, i numeri del trial pfizer sono questi: https://t.co/CKwiRK9jxL E' che il nostro amico "diversamente intelligente" storpia volutamente i dati. https://t.co/Wj3PuJGYbI
@Max_Palmeri Era difficile storpiare i dati in maniera così da cog**ne, ma lei c'è riuscito, complimenti. Non era facile. Questi, invece, i dati reali: Curva rossa vaccinati, curva blu non vaccinati. Figura vuota sono i casi, figura piena sono i deces
@Max_Palmeri Ovviamente non è il modo corretto di esporre i risultati. Il placebo non ha protetto nessuno Il vaccino ha evitato 19 infezioni su 20 I numeri da te citati dipendono da quanto sta circolando il virus e da quanto tempo aspetti per vedere infez
@ffert2907 @StevePascolo @Annette_LEXA @raoult_didier Les tests ont été faits et présentés par BioNTech. Insuffisants ? 44000 personnes enrôlées. Connaissez-vous un autre traitement plus testé ? Contestable ? Faits ? >des preuves de ça ! Service htt
@Art0fficiall @Debunk_the_Funk @TigerlillySusan Evidently you didn't read the conclusion that I posted. You obviously didn't read the trial reports themselves, e.g. https://t.co/4xeZ89eoGL
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | New England Journal of Medicine https://t.co/fiM8CLlNQt
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
RT @lonnibesancon: Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
Ah oui? Et ça c'est quoi alors? 🤡 https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0
@VukVelesov @Slavica95312023 @Jella23268386 Proverite podatke, ko vam brani? Naučne studije su javno dostupne u naučnim publikacijama, svako može da proveri i ponovi istraživanja u datim uslovima. Evo za 4 vakcine u Srbiji https://t.co/4WStlCsAkc iRNK tehn
RT @2023Masaya: この話はHPVワクチンの例の白い分厚い本に同じことが書かれていたことが記憶しています。 なので、ワクチンそのものではなく、添加されているものが問題なのかとツイートしたことがありました。
@Kanga7577 @Shannon77683528 @BassonBrain @wideawake_media I’ve read lots. I even read this, which you claimed I was just making up. I read the one after that too. And the one after that. https://t.co/f0W1V4zJw5
@blower07_rex @Enough71364045 @1_southernmiss @AlertChannel Here is the phase 3 trial results https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@Erin_Fren @thevegdoc You can't lie your way out of this
@Kanga7577 @Shannon77683528 @BassonBrain @wideawake_media Published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December, 2020. https://t.co/f0W1V4zJw5
RT @biti_zdrav: Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ od…
Niz koji sadrži naučne studije i podatke o vakcinama protiv kovida 19 i SARS-CoV-2 virusa. https://t.co/28YRJ8JMZO
RT @biti_zdrav: Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ od…
RT @hanan052020: @meeeemet @dokter_kampung Mas ahmad.. bisa baca paper ini kan ya.. What do u think of this paper? Apa critical point dari…
@teodul888 @Slavica95312023 Svoje homoseksualne fantazije slobodno zadržite za sebe i vaše sličnomišljenike. Na vašu žalost, sve su vakcine ispitane. https://t.co/3G6HMHZZXO Do decembra 2022. bilo je 50 odobrenih vakcina, 242 koje se ispituju u 821 studiji
Kažu necivilizovani da su vakcine eksperimentalne i neispitane. 🤷 Ista tema u petoj godini od početka pandemije.🤦 Od 50+ odobrenih vakcina, koje to nisu ispitane? 1. Podaci svih vakcina do 2. 12. 2022. https://t.co/cLOnz9ZNQH 2. Pfizer-BioNtech BNT162b2 h
@Jon_in_TX @cstephens959 @ginacarano This is honestly a work of art. Thank you. Robust, peer reviewed clinical data. Published *four years ago*: https://t.co/pXoHbeqSeQ https://t.co/0BFUmCaZoN
@MilanSimeunovi9 Ne, gospodine. To je bio teror nevakcinisanih i antivaksera u čijim telima su prirodni rezervoari za nove mutacije i sojeve virusa. Zbog takvih (uglavnom) se i pandemija otegla i odnela dosta žrtava. Vakcine su ispitane, svaka od pedeseta
@RidQuantumDrive @Stphani77858269 @silvano_trotta Dc vs affirmez... puis vs fuyez 🤣 Bah commencez par ça chaton ; https://t.co/23nqsIK1TR
@ChrisDodwell01 @chrischirp @Otto_English While I hardly love pharma companies, what you’ve heard isn’t true. The results have been public since December 2020. https://t.co/WrNZjuOuY9 The “75 years” thing: https://t.co/8md6fouqxt
@RealJermWarfare @OxfordSaffa @keiron1973 No. Plenty. Let’s start with an obvious one. https://t.co/bse4DYg0PZ
@Livythinker Perché all' inizio hanno dimostrato che era sicuro ed efficace. https://t.co/dSUdTKho7r
@4CPcomics https://t.co/VtUjBiyyLm I don't want to play grievance games right now. I've had a long day, and you are jumping through conversations at a rate that I'm just not interested in. Going back to your original point, WA state took a good strategy, a
@ChrisCuomo Wrong! Dr Birx! The Jab was NEVER studied to reduce hospitalization and death. It was studied to reduce SYMPTOMS ! Enough lying! https://t.co/VlX3eI9IPY
@TimothyNuell @WotsOnInfo @DotWolmarans Try sneezing through a mask. Masks work by REDUCING the emission of aerosols and droplets which contain pathogens. More silliness by you, this time about vaccines. https://t.co/4ygv1aIYPp
@TheoFleury14 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
@FreedomReigns2 @DrSusanOliver1 No, it was shown in a clinical trial. Your ignorance to how things work isn’t evidence. It is not the medical and scientific community’s fault that you are willfully ignorant. https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt
@jrdufil @fichotnicole Vous recopiez bien la merde des réseaux sociaux, mais vous pourriez aussi faire vos propres recherche. Essai de phase 3 publié en bonne et due forme en novembre 2020. https://t.co/mlTWQxnS3f
@Moosepiss1 @BreezerGalway @_graymatterpod @NicotineLozeng Pfizer P3 trial - Dec 2020 🤡 https://t.co/IPkpHn8Eub https://t.co/DgBgMCRxzE
@robdawg925 @Kevin_McKernan @edenstanwarr @thereal_truther @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 @RobertKennedyJr Link to the above text. It’s literally the first trailer in a search for “Pfeizer Covid study data”. Look under adverse effects heading. https://t.co
@robdawg925 @thereal_truther @Debunk_the_Funk @IanCopeland5 @RobertKennedyJr That's not how vaccine efficacy is calculated. From Table 3 in the clinical trial results, overall proportion in vaccinated group is 8/17411. In placebo group, 162/17511. Divide v
@BGatesIsaPyscho LOLOLOLOLOL. Scientists didn't lie. Vaccines are safe and effective. https://t.co/7B6S4eEfSK