191 followers
So far, Altmetric has seen
53893 tweets from 39411 users, with an upper bound of 13,323,226 followers.
191 followers
1,419 followers
Anti-vaxxers tell me these tests were never done. Odd as hell: Here’s a report on one of the trials. 2/n Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine - PubMed https://t.co/HoM3LJMrk8
641 followers
@plumber_dragon @HeyNurseKat @DrCanuckMD @jonathanstea 4/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1
793 followers
@IvanLoans @IanCopeland5 DRs went first. We got vaccinated, willingly, first. Side effects were available from the initial trial. Published December 10, 2020. https://t.co/Vgf3MZY5MG
70 followers
@averros271828 @GloriaJH @stkirsch @Babydoll921961 So, it's all a conspiracy theory? Everything that doesn't fit your belief is a lie? What would convince you that P3 has been completed? It's easily demonstrable. Here are the phase 2/3 results. https:
61 followers
1,104 followers
3,308 followers
@joshux321 @dr_jon_l @jason_willz1 @andrewbostom What study? No, a non-peer-reviewed Substack article from a non-expert paranoid crackpot like Fenton is not a "study". https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc
240 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
61 followers
@laurensbuijs @TimonLeeuw "Zoek op Google Scholar" ipv met concrete voorbeelden komen. 1 op 1 overgenomen uit de wappie handleiding. Kijk hier eens naar. Met je domme gelul over mRNA. https://t.co/myBgv3QkZ7
111 followers
@Meagain10411919 @PampireRN @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie you probably think pfizer should conduct the study themselves too. stop pushing this bullshit.
24 followers
@Yibril08 @RocketWolf89 @Carbonized_1 @creditannie @catturd2 False. My brother literally volunteered to be in a trial. They did do trials. https://t.co/jw70WN54sd
299 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
38 followers
RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…
2,309 followers
@literarysolace @VikiLovesFACS It underwent preclinical, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III clinical trials and post marketing surveillance before approval. It has an excellent safety record and was very effective. https://t.co/M3Q0VM9ecE
212 followers
17 followers
@Voice0vTheFree @MMeBlackSheep 1) avoir « toutes » les infos est impossible 2) certaines infos ne peuvent être obtenus qu’après vaccination à grande échelle 3) il faut >1 an pour ces résultats beaucoup seraient morts. 4) l’essentiel était là: protection
789 followers
@jenenews @a_husby That was officially published Dec 2020, but they had data by Oct 2020 https://t.co/iqxV4fpZ6Z
19 followers
135 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
877 followers
@goddeketal Here is a so-called “scientist” blocking a real scientist because he doesn’t like having his lies exposed. Go figure. #VaccinesWork, with reference. https://t.co/rp4u2iC5va
785 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
16 followers
@CBarronie @boomsmackrecord @chrischirp So you can't answer any of my 4 points. You are wrong: "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6)" so statistically significant. https://t.co/SPokb76u23
1,581 followers
Your definition of low is 1223 DEATHS, 42,086 case reports of Adverse Events with 158,893 different types in nearly all the participants in the study & 11,361 NOT Recovered participants with 9,400 Unknown outcomes. If that’s your definition of safe you
205 followers
198 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
947 followers
@libyourbestlife @benshapiro Do you know that even in Pfizer own RCT, MORE total people died in the vax group than in the non-vax group (4 extra deaths in the vax group from heart related issues)? Was that information shared with the public? Do you think
90 followers
知ったかは、要らない。 確認されてる。お前、本当にバカだな。 お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
1,918 followers
@Wozza777 @Checkmate__2020 @healthbyjames You are embarrassing yourself. https://t.co/JKUdoAeNdp
464 followers
RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…
185 followers
@jonrice1 @dave43law @ABridgen Fake news. Here is the direct link to NEJM and what it says about the vaccine. https://t.co/M2btibyTLB
573 followers
@cryptolady67 @Maxim_Holt Clinical trials van Pfizer. Afgerond in november 2020: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R
119 followers
@tom_anticomm @stkirsch Doctors had efficacy data like Pfizer's phase 3 RCT paper which anyone could have gone and read any time after it was published https://t.co/BrzvU4lgrC
119 followers
@stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventing covid-19 and low adverse events similar to placebo? https://t.co/BrzvU4lgrC
637 followers
@VicD04966674 @zap_lock @DrAseemMalhotra If you don't want to get vaccinated, I couldn't care less, but leave others to decide for themselves NO, plenty of scientific studies and subsequent population data have shown the vaccines to be effective Present
1,123 followers
1,123 followers
@wtrbfflo @NBSaphierMD You must have missed the studies - here is the seminal study which lead to the vaccine FDA approval of the BioNTech/Pfizer joint vaccine… https://t.co/CzpJIx7kOF
30 followers
@warrickfraser @DevilWearsMAGA @mikeinmarlton @nLyte2 @boaz_eric @catturd2 It was the FOI request which was going to take decades. Absolutely nothing to do with Pfizer. The results from the trials were released in 2020: https://t.co/7xlE2koMeF You’re bei
11,551 followers
@JustinVillemure @MichaelVSmith7 @healthbyjames I’ve backed up my claims with sources. If you want to continue talking show yours. I dare you. https://t.co/tK29nrOgOY
11,551 followers
@JustinVillemure @Trumpesantis @MichaelVSmith7 @healthbyjames @IanCopeland5 🤣 here you go. Proof your phase 3 is ongoing statement is inaccurate. https://t.co/tK29nrOgOY
6,499 followers
@laylag2 لازم نفرق بين preventing disease و preventing transmission دراسة المرحلة الثالثة كانت مصممة لمعرفة ما إذا اللقاح يمنع الإصابة preventing disease و كانت الفعالية ٩٥٪ و لم تكن مصممة لمعرفة prevention of transmission هذه الدراسات جاءت لاحقاً http
1,528 followers
@a_solveig96 @TracyBethHoeg The paper CLEARLY SHOWS the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual getting symptoms or severe disease. & your threat is duly rec
877 followers
@judgeschmails @goddeketal Keep up!
291 followers
@AvoquaD @arikouts @Ex_infirmier @AgretDenis Conclusion le 10 décembre 2020 en 3 mois d'étude: efficacité: 95%. https://t.co/m5RtP5aQes
603 followers
RT @basemstat: @alhunayan من جدك دكتور دراسة على الحيوانات ثلاث مراحل دراسية على البشر دراسة المرحلة الثالثة فيها ٤٤ ألف مشارك و خضعت للمرا…
6,499 followers
@alhunayan من جدك دكتور دراسة على الحيوانات ثلاث مراحل دراسية على البشر دراسة المرحلة الثالثة فيها ٤٤ ألف مشارك و خضعت للمراجعة و التدقيق Peer review و تم نشرها في مجلة NEJM و بعدها إعتماد طارئ و بعدها إعتماد كلي يعني معقولة كل هذا ما صار !!! https://t.
220 followers
@KerryOLeary4 @healthbyjames Please highlight on the paper where this is said? https://t.co/y69ZPV8G8P
11,551 followers
@Allisonb1 @BradClugston @PatrickGman @healthbyjames No I’m referring to the Phase 3 trial data published in the New England Journal of medicine. https://t.co/bXmsZkJWnD
311 followers
@Chris93254924 @mikenike1290 @lesoleildeqc https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij C’est quoi ça si c’est pas la phase 3 🤔
52 followers
@dttpeople @IanCopeland5 @unhealthytruth There are important differences between “population at large” studies and clinical trials. Both are useful. For your vaccination safety and efficacy concerns where the requested info is mostly known: https://t.co/jP
4,718 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
254 followers
@FuriousDmac @focusingman Correct. Note, too, that mRNA vaccine safety was assessed in 10's of thousands of individuals over a six-month timeframe. See below for BNT162b2 example. https://t.co/RFRus9VK9w
458 followers
@Enix_Moon_ @catturd2 The vaccine WAS tested. Thoroughly. See the study linked below. Not only that, but we have a vast amount of data on outcomes, so we KNOW it's extremely safe. Your news is lying to you. Flat out lying. Read more widely please. https
346 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
34,517 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
1,662 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
855 followers
RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…
190 followers
RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…
1,562 followers
RT @PBasiukiewicz: W "przebadanych bezpiecznych i skutecznych" w oryginalnych RCT nie zanotowano zapalenia m. sercowego - które było przycz…
0 followers
@JapanSenelar @lonnibesancon Je vous ai donné le lien : https://t.co/msdaCdduaE Non il n'y a pas en double aveugle. Oui un test pas comme ceux de Raoult. Je suis d'accord avec vous
10,211 followers
RT @Wide9Giants: @IanCopeland5 @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @horseivermectin @stkirsch why didn’t this study show increase in deat…
121 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
2,328 followers
@NikoandOkin @sarahbosetti Hier die Zulassungsstudie: https://t.co/QyWEgTYy1c Auch in der Packungsbeilage wird heute noch eine Wirksamkeit von 95% behauptet: https://t.co/ThcGCEzBEs https://t.co/HNs7Q3nK4s
0 followers
@JapanSenelar @lonnibesancon Déduction ? https://t.co/msdaCdcWl6 Depuis le temps vous avez dû la lire. Il y a celle aussi de moderna si vous voulez. Mais comme vous avez l'air d'aimer plus Pfizer
877 followers
@JustDaweed @goddeketal Fair point. Here you go then to get you started. https://t.co/rp4u2iCDkI
22,621 followers
#COVID19 #FreeSpeech #vaccines Problems continue. We still don't have the outcome measure we need
51 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
462 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
926 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
1,716 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
635 followers
45 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
6,733 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
3,901 followers
RT @shmuelcshapira: 2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162…
635 followers
34,517 followers
2020 safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. 2023 we still don't have them. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/0Duw6hrPyW
21,617 followers
@Trumpsfield @AnnalenaLogopae Die erste Phase-III-Studie zur Sicherheit und Wirksamkeit wurde bereits 2020 publiziert. https://t.co/l6yMcCLnxU
5,423 followers
@telesynth_hot @Navarp @outfielding @MeanderingRhode @shmuelcshapira Years of testing? - it’s completed all the testing any other vaccine does. The stages where done concurrently not sequentially, hence the speed! No paper? - https://t.co/1h3kQjXO1C @Na
1,697 followers
@boriquagato Also, simply read that first study that claimed 95% efficacy & led to the EUA. Most of the "believers" were satisfied with MSM headlines. If they would have read the paper, even without any medical background, common sense would have pre
191 followers
@Aaaaa1985ttt まず反ワクチンの時点でお察しw 致死率こそインフル並みになったといえ後遺症が高い確率で出て長続きするんだよw ここで学業に支障を来したらお先真っ暗だよ？倦怠感も程度次第じゃ動けなくなるし対策しなきゃw 東京都保険福祉局https://t.co/df0lIfRIDg https://t.co/hHHCJY1q2f
2,309 followers
471 followers
@gohawks789 @goc1978 @vancemurphy It was tested. Here's the original study, released the month before it was approved. Note that they never claimed it stopped asymptomatic transmission (in the "Discussion" section) https://t.co/P0xMo1xgQb
637 followers
212 followers
@VaxFreeSperm @ElenaTh5 @TerriMccarter4 @Jamesdtweets2 @RWMaloneMD Being from the UK makes me less true. https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
212 followers
212 followers
212 followers
212 followers
212 followers
212 followers
15 followers
65 followers
65 followers
@NIKOLAT42891347 Voilà les publication originale des publications des vaccins à ARNm contre le SRAS-CoV-2 Pfizer : https://t.co/6izC869ih5 Moderna : https://t.co/NemKzJGpzr
2,120 followers
@LelenaPeacock @jvgraz @RealSteveCox @twittposter @lmcsomewhere @RogerAramayo2 @jimmy_dore Here's the RCT for Pfizer/BioNTech. https://t.co/8cWQVACyyU
1,947 followers
@Leon1969 @ThomasInLeiden @SeKuRiGo @28111970jef @OmroepOn Zal je iets specifieker moeten zijn over waar je je informatie vandaan haalt. Als je kijkt naar de trials (bijv. https://t.co/2DOUV2MgOW) wordt voor bijwerkingen écht geteld vanaf moment van inje
423 followers
526 followers
Funding and Disclosures Supported by BioNTech and Pfizer.
297 followers
@IanCopeland5 @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD @horseivermectin @stkirsch why didn’t this study show increase in death in vaccine if your amazing totally valid survey “study” of ratios showed increased death https://t.co/Ke31qc5eQW
7 followers
RT @MannicheVibeke: I didn´t get vaccinated because I was NEVER afraid of COVID-19. Also the small study which gave Pfizer access to the wo…