Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

@BubblesJack1 @DeBunKerEtoiles @Linasecours2 @mikalpin https://t.co/vOYAAznqdP

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @lamccon @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @PierreKory https://t.co/BKb6iTIQZy https://t.co/yA88N7OMOU https://t.co/4fp…

@basiukiewiczpaw 2/ Idąc tym samym tokiem rozumowania musiałby Pan napisać że istnieje powiązanie zdarzeń niepożądanych zarówno po podaniu szczepionki jak i po podaniu PLACEBO 🙃 https://t.co/x2hUcaLdsz https://t.co/VEJ8aQYjUS

@zq2OnfRZxZqo https://t.co/FOLqptH86g 例えば有名なNEJMのランダム化比較試験だけど知ってる？ ワクチンの副反応をプラセボ群と比較してるんやけど、万単位の人間でやったRCTで重篤な副作用は確認できなかったんだけど、

@Whachex1 @Wachex1 “Dada la alta eficacia de la vacuna”; y consideraciones de tipo “práctico” también. https://t.co/4q1sTYbaML https://t.co/HjN1AQecEL

@dottorcorbelli1 @MatteoRedaelli8 @fabriziodavoli1 @DavidPuente @FrancescoLucky2 @RobertoBurioni Madonna che ignorante! https://t.co/cSS3GhleEF

@arnovj @Dimitri081970 @arnaudsprenger @VanStippent @MarieWvL Gevolgd door de officiele publicatie: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R

@PierrotLL @Nodo23049099 Exemple dans ce tableau, le temps de surveillance*patient est donné en milliers de "person-year". Ce n'est pas une absurdité de cumuler. L'argument des anti est de dire qu'il faut au moins 5 ou 10 ans de recul historique. https://t

@KCRyan69 @thebradfordfile @Pat_Henry2022 https://t.co/mAAAuPZcsf

@reeealbeard @AvocadoDiaboli @Dr_GackGack https://t.co/My2JbTvZ7m >BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Sie verteidigen!

@ecozdence @dr_phototherapy @stabilyorgun @tuncsoyer https://t.co/ZcdPCBIoRo

@Lord_Bransty @mlperk1 @TheRadicalShow @MaajidNawaz @OdyseeTeam I wasnt pointing out the typo. I was pointing out the fact it wasnt said. The evidence isnt "made up". https://t.co/R3F0ePuw0x Literally misdirection.

@m_a_cudel @nmarc68 @cdube_sante https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij On est phase clinique tu disais La phase 3 est terminé et les résultats sont déjà sorti

@doom37455413 @ShockTraumaRN @BreezerGalway @zeetubes @JimeeLiberty @doritmi @nuhope2022 @IdunsDaughter @jtmayes3 @pawley_robert @SkepticalMutant @tomsirolimus @ogilville1 @richykirsh @provaxtexan @TonyBaduy @MaureenStroud @ConsequentialBr @Monstercoyliar

@lamccon @TigerlillySusan @JonathanSarfat1 @PierreKory https://t.co/BKb6iTIQZy https://t.co/yA88N7OMOU https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc

@lecrilibre @yette2607 @YvnCdric @v_joron Safety ✅ -> https://t.co/QqYBrt3S0u

@yette2607 @lecrilibre @YvnCdric @v_joron https://t.co/QqYBrt3S0u?

RT @rcr_pereira: @hereforfun130 @ThiomargaritaNA @InCytometry @magamuslim1 @Dave_Calls_BS @CurfewX @Poppy_PTMY @MarkHar68427074 @Stuyvesant…

@ASNilsannath @philippe_md @MarcheEnsemble @BFMTV 95% sur la souche originale. 100% sur des sous groupes de test. https://t.co/XBxIVVt3Ei https://t.co/xb1YptzNV7

@GenyFrouin @Le___Doc https://t.co/H6oTDRM2WS

@CTrott6 @florianaigner Autsch. Zulassung: https://t.co/IxjoB5vS8e Zulassungsstudie mit 3. Phase: https://t.co/XzU4kI0iuI Tierversuche hier: https://t.co/XzU4kI0iuI Da ist nichts unplanmäßig gestorben

@MaskedQuestion @Sander_Lab https://t.co/5SC5RsCyOg

@seyirciydim @BlackeagleG @Dunyayalan2022 Üatüne bir sürü bilim dergiisnde makallwler bile çıkmış. Bunlar hepsi daha aşılar uygulanmaya başlamadan. https://t.co/aYjEKCFenk

@ImmortelleXIII @TartuffletteD @zertsaf @FLAHAULT Hey bah vous ne sachiez pas faire vos propres recherches ? https://t.co/nxSEXZYbl0

@hereforfun130 @ThiomargaritaNA @InCytometry @magamuslim1 @Dave_Calls_BS @CurfewX @Poppy_PTMY @MarkHar68427074 @StuyvesantAnna @thecoastguy Are you seriously not embarrassed asking these bad faith questions almost 3 years into the pandemic? We already kn

Nice thank you I'll give this a read ASAP I must hug some pillow now have a good night and a better tomorrow peace

@Service_Proof @g_ballew Background trial documents never get released to the public. The only way to get those is to file a FOIA request. Many details have to be redacted. But Pfizer did publish their trial results in 2020. https://t.co/J9boMAOrpm(30%20%

>医療者こそ新薬に慎重になるべきだろう 慎重になって、コレ読んだのか？ https://t.co/D6M6lwHr64 お前の慎重って、空想することか？笑

@CaldiRoberto STUDIA! https://t.co/VWquF5yjBQ

@CaldiRoberto @MarFil_MB @SandroTorella https://t.co/VWquF5yjBQ

@CaldiRoberto @MarFil_MB @SandroTorella Sei de coccio oh https://t.co/VWquF5yjBQ

@CaldiRoberto @MarFil_MB @SandroTorella Sì. I trial sono finiti nel 2020. Ciao bello. https://t.co/VWquF5yjBQ

@simocaro @puscascapo @EnricoLetta Articolo di pfitzer sulla loro sperimentazione (durata appena 2 mesi). Leggere le limitazioni dell'unico studio randomizzato e controllato che hanno fatto https://t.co/Ph8R4rAYDP

@JaguarsRCool @RepThomasMassie @MaryJaneBryksa There is evidence. Studies are performed to see how effective the vaccines are. That's how we know the Johnson and Johnson single shot wasn't as good as the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. https://t.co/mm9wCdH4jW

@IsDatEchtZo5 @Wim04789402 @surv64 @Coolbird76 @de_weeteri @kittyvalkering Nog nooit de fase 3 studie gelezen? Lijkt me stug, ik heb je die link vaker gegeven. Maar goed - eet smakelijk: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R

@ecozdence @dr_phototherapy @stabilyorgun @tuncsoyer Biontech faz 3 sonucu https://t.co/AlTD4Ka8gQ

@ecozdence @dr_phototherapy @stabilyorgun @tuncsoyer Biontech faz 3 https://t.co/AlTD4Ka8gQ Sinovac https://t.co/1tHoESBxXY Moderna https://t.co/PJBfZxGsiC AstraZeneca https://t.co/Pq3NtNfRey Johnson & Johnson https://t.co/N2rCXlYgwE

@JeremyFOUBERT1 @Le___Doc Mais tout à fait nous les avons, si tu veux le lien de l'étude le voilà : https://t.co/2UfRgRB49y

@Korchkidu @VLautard Maintenant ça c'est de la science et il notait 95% ! Oh comme c'est bizarre.... https://t.co/dYL6ITDBc7

@Korchkidu @VLautard C'est ce qui a été fait ? Non donc pourquoi tu te ridiculises ! 🤡 T'es vraiment incroyable ! D'une mauvaise foi lâche ! Aller va lire l'étude au lieu de t'inventer une réalité parallèle pcq sérieux tu fais pitié la ! Avec tes arguments

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@SuseSusesky2 @florianaigner Bitte keine Geschichtsklitterung betreiben. Schau mal: https://t.co/Fj6hPlEYwT

@ohloul @SandrineCanella @AJouassard @EBrocardi Tiens voici l'étude telle qu'elle a été soumise à l'EMA à l'époque. Je pensais que m'aurais parlé de ce doc: https://t.co/XBxIVVt3Ei

@florianaigner Die NNV von um die 143 (ARR von 0.7%) aus einer Biontech Studie gegen die Alpha Variante war schon unter aller Sau. https://t.co/VOQMUApav6

@Leseratte32 Die Zulassungsstudie von Comirnaty finden Sie u.a. hier: https://t.co/KpQo93x21C Weiterführende Studien in großer Zahl zur Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der Impfstoffe finden Sie beispielsweise unter https://t.co/MpftMWGAV2

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@Batmax90 @kylchra @GraceRandolph Where the fuck did u get that information of 100 ppl? Here, this is original study on Pfizer vaccine, it was done on 40K+ ppl… https://t.co/lGUoYTahRd

RT @AtomsksSanakan: @Chris__Sage @pathogenetics @MJnanostretch @Florin_Uncovers @PhilippMarkolin Re: "And even then was vaccine misinformat…

@Chris__Sage It sure isn't 21 days, since seroconversion occurs by around 14 days. If you knew what "seroconversion" meant, then you'd know how ridiculous your initial claim was. And no, pretending you know who I am does not mean you did your homework on

@Chris__Sage Feel free to pretend you know who I am. It's the most your lot has at this point, since no one sensible is falling for your disinformation anymore. 😉 https://t.co/2E7zWzD6ke https://t.co/NlIDDe1Mmg https://t.co/EF83mFeiDe

RT @CraftMandalas: Bizi DENEK yapmak için, BİZE SORDUNUZ MU⁉️ Madem bizi DENEK olarak şirketlerin önüne attınız,neden aşı mecburiyeti için…

@JenningsIRL @HR_Cohen @sevodreams @coletti5150 @CdnFreedomGirl https://t.co/VpKKPAHsx1 here’s their trial data after peer review, a document you clearly haven’t seen before

@JenningsIRL @HR_Cohen @sevodreams @coletti5150 @CdnFreedomGirl https://t.co/VpKKPAHsx1

@JenningsIRL @sevodreams @coletti5150 @HR_Cohen @CdnFreedomGirl https://t.co/VpKKPAHsx1 are you talking about this freely released trial data? Or the stuff the FDA freely released during their advisory committee meetings? Or were you not even aware that

@DIVOC84 @Blue__Hammer @Monarch_Venture @DrJ56013122 Here’s the freely released phase 3 trial data from 2020 https://t.co/VpKKPAHsx1

@gchampeau @Le_Media_Live Vous racontez vraiment n'importe quoi, le vaccin a été autorisé exactement sur la seule base de sa capacité à prévenir l'infection. Non seulement ils ont prétendu ça, mais ils n'ont prétendu *que* ca. https://t.co/GefS6m4Gbs

@Brenda59674735 @MNHockeymama @JeromeAdamsMD 1. Study showing Pfizer prevented 95% of COVID infections for initial variant. (Graph compares infection rate with Pfizer, in red, versus infection rate with placebo, in blue.) Many studies after rollout to popu

@Jibbs63 @longlivehunt @disclosetv But I agree that the original studies did try for prevention, which they claimed was up to 95%. Public health messaging has been poor & added to confusion, vaccine hesitancy & distrust (imo). Clearly the vaxxes

@QUzelman @VeritasEver @AspAlaAsnAsnTyr @callanswag2 @Cypherpunkology @disclosetv @TwitterSupport It was 95% in the clin trial. https://t.co/S6IOAcHfR3

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@maziak @ProfTimNoakes @pfizer https://t.co/frrj0JdmXa was published in December of 2020 for the whole world to see

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

Harika bir thread ve "ben çok hafif geçirdim" diyenler için ibretlik. Herkes ilk enfeksiyonunu hafif geçirebilir ama 10.enfeksiyonunda "hafif" olmadığını mutlaka anlayacaktır... #COVID19

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@thevivafrei Did the authors of this NEJM piece make up their data? https://t.co/71V4gNUR3W

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@PeletteSean @AzaIllusive @brownstoneinst "There were no safety trials" is a ridiculous lie. You can see the outcome of the safety trials here: https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w VAERS says right on it that one cannot use the data to infer causality. Congrats, yo

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

@Rhianno40418828 @helen38579846 @JohnStone32 @beverleyturner “A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older.” https://t.co/FqrhTj7xoq

@SS7S11 @63Hiroki1 https://t.co/Fc3P9QBM7b https://t.co/lla2UxM8CZ 色々公開されてると思うんですが何が不満なのかよくわかりません

@cmkiel @OXHarryH1 @akheriaty Do you just spread this misinfo because you actually believe the propaganda you hear or have you just not read what you claim to know. “The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19

@DomCorner3 @AnneFroment @LP_LaPresse 4- On peut voir les résultats des tests cliniques dans cette étude : https://t.co/gDMcqSQ165

RT @keisuke4713: Pfizer💉多施設試験NEJM https://t.co/EbiLbQ4cUa 疑問が多い事は明らか 約4万人中重度感染10人だけ(うち9人はプラセボ)⇒重度 1 例防ぐ為に、約 2,500人💉必要 💉者千人中6人が生命や手足に差し迫った…

Pfizer💉多施設試験NEJM https://t.co/EbiLbQ4cUa 疑問が多い事は明らか 約4万人中重度感染10人だけ(うち9人はプラセボ)⇒重度 1 例防ぐ為に、約 2,500人💉必要 💉者千人中6人が生命や手足に差し迫った脅威、入院や外科的介入が必要な反応、永続的障害反応 重篤1例予防毎に重大有害事象15もたらす

RT @jjhar2: @richardEnergy_ @Quantrillionair @jerame30 @DylanLeClair_ Sure, here is the original study on safety and efficacy. https://t.co…

@Tamburavadak Oh what’s that - you want peer reviewed data too? https://t.co/xZoFDSxyEl

@QuiteBrazen @UnrealizedTime @DylanLeClair_ here's some evidence that the vaccines work https://t.co/AglE2PK0UG

@btcFairValue @DylanLeClair_ https://t.co/AglE2PK0UG

@richardEnergy_ @Quantrillionair @jerame30 @DylanLeClair_ Sure, here is the original study on safety and efficacy. https://t.co/tECSMletn4

@marekzikmund @vlvalek https://t.co/TtSfQYJ1SV

@Jan77Machacek @vlvalek https://t.co/TtSfQYJ1SV

RT @DarwinEmmiYedek: mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England…

mRNA aşıları ilk defa denenmedi ve faz 3 sonuçları hatalı değildi. Aralık 2020'de hakemli tıp dergisi The New England Journal and Medicine'de 43000 kişilik plasebo kontrollü,randomize Faz 3 çalışmaya göre ; %95 etkinlik https://t.co/AlTD4Ka8gQ

@ASonOHugh1 @Sharky_vs_Evil what? https://t.co/lZezceRTFr

@AvonandsomerRob They didn’t claim 100% - that’s just silly wordplay The claim has only ever been 95% against the original variant https://t.co/wlKeF0a0Zw

@griffiths_rj @RobertN51219021 @AvonandsomerRob Fairly silly wordplay there The claim has only ever been 95% against the original variant https://t.co/wlKeF0a0Zw

@LoveTacosNBeer @powely147 @BarklyButcher @burrosavic @rowandean @RitaPanahi Well, there is this one. https://t.co/S6IOAcHfR3

@renwez08 https://t.co/4nkiy4Wl3r

@renwez08 le vaccin fonctionne, les études le montrent Et on l'a bien vu cet hiver quand les non vax représentaient 60% des personnes en réa (alors qu'il y avait que 8% des +18 ans qui n'étaient pas vaccinés) https://t.co/feBtYI3cwP https://t.co/H6oTDRM2

@RatchNurse @chrisstorey77 @tcdragonfly @AlanaKStewart @Twitter and original article: https://t.co/IGv1ap9lha

@5DAZ5 @smalltrend @AngelaCar999 @Ericdun19416783 @SkyNewsBreak Sure. Here's Pfizer https://t.co/r9XinPYI7k https://t.co/N50xoc1ZRT

https://t.co/R8GvwLmcwr

@facts_rober1 @ElizLamb67 @stevede123 @AlanaKStewart @Twitter and original article https://t.co/IGv1ap9lha

RT @ano_sci: また京都大学医生物学研究所准教授のデマ屋 宮沢孝幸が95%「感染阻止」とデマを流している 論文に目すら通していないし、読んでも理解できないんだな 論文読めない研究者って存在意義があるんだろうか モデルナ https://t.co/bof6fi5V1c…

@Cynthia45269 @willOrt98581590 @ChrisLusardi1 @NewDayForNJ @disclosetv It’s the same information that was summarized in the published clinical trials. You’re not reading, Cynthia, you’re just being lied to by people who want to scare you. https://t.co/EsjA

@TsunamiRider3 Not ignorant if it's true, and look this one does say safety trial 😂🤣 https://t.co/DdXmH7Qdxr

@jaywalker1418 @Deece5555 @RepThomasMassie My mistake, it was 95% effective. That was based on the trial with over 43,000 participants. https://t.co/KwCx9wtVuK