Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

@dazebird @BurgerLab12 @andylumm @kevinault @ADevotedYogi @F250Roush @JustPlaying2Win @JCDeardeuff @thatsnotmine125 @TierraHenson @TheCrystalBrian @Kathmarval @pawley_robert @RTheatheist @rodcoffman @barryjohnreid21 @Bebert701 @temple_surly @DrJoeMcCarthy

@JimGleeson Sorry, I'm not interested in your evidence-free paranoid conspiracy theories meant to evade the fact that vaccines passed phase 3 RCTs and are thus by definition not experimental (RCTs are experiments). https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc https://t.co/3C

@FenrisPeppers @Lindsay46791735 @drsimonegold Explain what this is then. 1/2 https://t.co/A0KhDVXvue

@7sealshortime @i_am_joli_anne @24Kirsten @greg_price11 @RepMTG https://t.co/Ymcs4S3jQj

@7sealshortime @i_am_joli_anne @24Kirsten @greg_price11 @RepMTG https://t.co/jNC3dzmJLR

@CanardMagic @VincLapierre Je ne lis pas les merdias 🤡 je lis les revues à comité de lecture 👇 https://t.co/EfOR58zB0P

@CanardMagic @VincLapierre Et ca c’est quoi? https://t.co/EfOR58zB0P

@ACIM96714321 @kana20160414 @JINKOUZOUKA_jp ちなみにだけど接種した人がたくさん死んだロットって最初期に高リスク群の高齢者達に先行で接種させたやつってご存じ？ それとまともに論文読めないならもう黙っておいた方が良いです。 治験自体も終わってて+αのデータ取り中なだけです。 https://t.co/I8VSVrQdhq

@NazarethJezus @kopotchef @arikouts Efficacité de la m**** de Pfizer pour les 18 ans et +, 0.88 % !! https://t.co/xDJLIHYHxu Figure 3, ça, ce sont des courbes de survie, les petits carrés sont des cas graves, dans le grp des vaccinés, une personne a fait u

@jannieOverkant @IsDatEchtZo5 @DrDavidNL Als je zelfs dat soort enorm simpele zaken niet weet.... En dan begin nu even uit te leggen hoe een verzwakt virus vaccin werkt. https://t.co/vzw5ZCDcuF

RT @mcfunny: @RationalStoic @pawley_robert @SariellaForever @LummHandy @JonathanHannah @Monstercoyliar @Pouldeau61 @JimeeLiberty @Kathmarva…

@nopoisonjabs @Dirty_Diver_ @ogilville1 @monyro5 @f_kyburz @zee_parody @Pouldeau61 @Nicoleg425 @Scary7Dr @SkepticalMutant @Shina20269455 @AndrewLazarus4 @volpiranyas @TackettWendi @WendyOrent @pawley_robert @ryanbeed @Monstercoyliar @mcfunny @BurgerLab12 @

@DougBookwriter2 @patricia_kooy @SPR2023 @mcckarlee @WildIrishCactus Literally five seconds. That's all it took for me to find this. https://t.co/3QLIBPLZ9m

RT @mcfunny: @RationalStoic @pawley_robert @SariellaForever @LummHandy @JonathanHannah @Monstercoyliar @Pouldeau61 @JimeeLiberty @Kathmarva…

@RationalStoic @pawley_robert @SariellaForever @LummHandy @JonathanHannah @Monstercoyliar @Pouldeau61 @JimeeLiberty @Kathmarval @chayotera1 @Scary7Dr @DrDavidMoore11 @Jaytee116James @JKelleyK @IdunsDaughter @kevinoler @TonyBaduy @ogilville1 @ShawnHereth @S

@Urca80 @loboestepario33 @carolina_moine @regorilas Yo pido que fundamenten cientificamente lo que consideran una conspiración estatal-científica y mediática planetaria que produce inmunodeficiencia adquirida post-vaccinal. Los datos de la vacuna Pfizer-Bi

@Nicolip2022 @BadMedicalTakes Safety questions asked and answered, two year ago: https://t.co/y1JlnEoyRp

@DeBunKerEtoiles l'étude de base contre le sarscov2 https://t.co/9I6OYaWP1E

@LilBrother0311 @voteLabonte @godless_doc @BoofNasty_69 @jordanbpeterson Nope. Neither Fauci nor CDC ever said the vaccines were 95% effective against transmission. They might have said that about infection because the vaccines were 95% effective against i

@IsDatEchtZo5 @DrDavidNL @jannieOverkant En hier kun je het ook nog een keer nalezen https://t.co/LwTCYyYqaE

@Van_Silv @saverios7 @SandriAvv È un dato assoluto,gli studi parlano chiaro.https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB E Pfizer non ha fatto i test perché non era quello lo scopo dei vaccini ma impedire malattia grave e decesso.

@anu_lindqvist @Timo_Raunio @MariaNordin @stkirsch @RWMaloneMD @P_McCulloughMD Et sitten ole lukenut tätä faasista 3, yli 40 000? Vertaisarvioitu. Julkaistu joulukuun 2020 alussa. https://t.co/R1Z0YCzGe6

This is a lie sadly being amplified by @MLevitt_NP2013. The endpoints of Pfizer's trial were symptomatic disease (or severe disease as a secondary endpoint) combined with a positive COV2 test. https://t.co/idszGpiT0S https://t.co/s0CczzxcWP

@BradKilkenny @Spikey7X @stkirsch I mean, here is an actual double blind study from that period. https://t.co/8kIeSZsynK. If you want a database of actual studies, you can check ‘em out here. https://t.co/u8p9ZlhB6K

@GuerquinThomas @silvano_trotta @Cyrilhanouna @amine_umlil cf la publication de l essai du vaccin sur NEJM il y avait 37706 participant dont seulement 18860 ont reçu le vaccin et le autres le placebo et même si ils avaient été 25000 cela change quoi s

@Alvaroomega19 @Jaamra @jc_jugo @AntonioArauz_I Aquí tienes los datos de la "efectividad" de la vacuna de pfizer https://t.co/g5R9aiUCrP

@lajata2 @healthbyjames - RSV - Dengue Fever That's one of the reasons why we do clinical trials. As was done for BNT162b2, for example: https://t.co/9sO0ajc75q

@denarsims @stkirsch phase 3 trial ended Dec 2020. Here is the phase 3 trial publication https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe

@SteveRickettsSP nothing funny about seeing w/ your own eyes the trial purpose was to prevent SYMPTOMS as primary endpoint and secondary endpoint was SEVERE disease/death https://t.co/kmxiHPSlMK https://t.co/f4sn5nFpqh

@megan16283437 @mpc_xetts @dulcet_Panacea @GeorgeMonbiot @DrAseemMalhotra @DoubleDownNews Here's the trial data: https://t.co/Oec08KKnlc And here's where pfizer say they plan to stop the trial after 164 infections: https://t.co/FXkqZLXAlO

@JetHire @manchestermelly @RPur122 43 thousand. You should read it. https://t.co/lzdLiyDojp

This study published in the New England Journal of Medicine found that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine is highly effective in preventing symptomatic COVID-19 and severe disease. It's a reliable source for vaccine skeptics to consider. https://t.co/y2HkkcoItU

@getyourtwocents @DrJBhattacharya This is from 2020, before it was approved. Would you like to go for double jeapordy where the score can really add up? https://t.co/z1xCLelAvP

@TECleveland @Ydennekde @ClownBasket The unblinding occurred after reaching the efficiency endpoints, but before other endpoints were reached: 10 Dec "Collection of phase 2/3 data on vaccine immunogenicity and the durability of the immune response to immun

@danielmaxx1 @AdrianChaffey @GeorgeMonbiot @DrAseemMalhotra The 2020 pfizer trial data states there were 3838 participants given the vaccine aged 65-75 and 774 over 75. I'd therefore dispute the accuracy of your statement. https://t.co/jK5fGNUdS2 https:/

@Van_Silv @saverios7 @SandriAvv Anche perché i dati erano già stati pubblicati e confermava la protezione da contagio fino al 94%.https://t.co/R9sGu8b2lB Boccalona.

@TalkDontInsult @BBudd8 @drsimonegold Would you like a #ScientificStudy to show you #Vaccines are safe? You showed such #concern for me, I want to return the favour, #Poodle! Here's one... I've got so many to share! https://t.co/6yvCXgSddq

@AprilAbigailWu @WJoosse @annemariehaast1 @thierrybaudet Ze zeggen, te klein aantal mensen zijn boven een bepaalde leeftijd en dat is een categorie die bovenmodaal kon sterven. Maar negeren dat 30% van de testgroep overgewicht had, juist om risicogroepen

@PepeDecipher @Annette_LEXA Essais cliniques de phase 3 terminés en décembre 2020. Voici la publication scientifique qui en atteste : https://t.co/jb8ifi1GMv

@MelBronze @DrAseemMalhotra @elonmusk The vaccines are no longer experimental (November 2020) Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine https://t.co/zRW5iaWG7t

@LehouxGregory2 @arikouts Ici pour BioNtech/pfizer : https://t.co/FCR8mbM0Tz

@alc_anthro @DrLoupis It was sold as 95% effective at preventing infection 🙄 Zero mention of severity, hospitalisation, or death. Stop parroting. https://t.co/BNrXGQk0kD

@slotcaller @all_in_tok @joerogan @DavidSacks @Jason There was no data for that at the time. The vaccine trial data showed 95% efficacy https://t.co/IEPIjQeDzL so the anti-vaxers were acting against the best data at the time. I agree the vaccines didn't sh

@Wolf_ofthe_West @Zigmanfreud There were 0 deaths in the actual Pfizer clinical trial study. The rate of severe infection was 20x higher in the placebo group (only 1 person in the vaccine group, and 0 after 7 days). https://t.co/viCDyg3rPd

@AprilAbigailWu @Anouck526 @annemariehaast1 @thierrybaudet Dit is de publicatie van de klinische studies (t/m fase 3). Kan jij in jouw woorden uitleggen wat er niet klopt? https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R

@justjckonecny @stkirsch Pre-market safety data (Phase 3 clinical trials) https://t.co/KzRcXntMqi Regardless of pre-market safety data, real world data supports safety. https://t.co/eqWhQiNLkv No increased risk of DVT in 792K patients. https://t.co/fSlPy

@LeaderJL3 @lonnibesancon "The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 & safety." I take laboratory-confirmed 2 mean they tested 4 infection,not symptomatic disease.I have other links for studies that suppo

@Beezerally @IanCopeland5 @LimeTinx your question is rooted in a lack of intellect and anti vaccine bias, but sure, we can start with the initial randomized controlled trials and work to more recent https://t.co/Q5xSiNzFfk. https://t.co/5ZIOuWabfl

RT @RoundEarthClub: @ONThealth @JesslovesMJK @welcometheeagle @joshg99 Beyond the fact that @pfizer's own investigators stopped looking aft…

@LeaderJL3 @lonnibesancon What was the denominator? Are you maybe falling for the base rate fallacy? I'll lookup the relevant studies. Please, post a link to the Pfizer RCT. I know of this one, (one of many papers that prove vaccines prevented infection in

@HuukedOnFonix @BossyKarl @whereisdaz @jordanbpeterson @pfizer No, it was sold as 95% effective at stoping you catching the virus 🙄 No mention of severity of symptoms, hospitalisation or death ☠️ https://t.co/BNrXGQk0kD

@LikesToLaugh101 Wrong https://t.co/5ZIOuWabfl

@Kevin_McKernan @RationalStoic @IanCopeland5 You mean this study never happened? https://t.co/Jnx2UPhmHS Nor this one https://t.co/TeebodoXLZ

@Damo__T @rtcizenski @9NewsAUS @ElizaEdNews https://t.co/uxrvfWZpsv Here :)

@randytate @BeastlySwagman @ScottAdamsSays But there was this. No? https://t.co/BgSKhyPk3d

@BeastlySwagman @randytate @ScottAdamsSays https://t.co/BgSKhyPk3d

@laszek_wallace @AlejandroPotre1 @outsock2 @rohangilkes @IanCopeland5 @stkirsch Oh and here's more proof that FDA and Pfizer never said it reduced transmission when the vaccines came out. https://t.co/TTRCtwBWbf

@ONThealth @JesslovesMJK @welcometheeagle @joshg99 Beyond the fact that @pfizer's own investigators stopped looking after two weeks, and stopped accepting "unsolicited" adverse event reports after six months... #pfizergate #PfizerExposed #pfizerliedpeopled

RT @ChrisEd16512812: @geoffmiller2984 @g_gosden You have really set yourself up Im afraid because the definitive study said the product pr…

RT @mcfunny: @DrGeniusGino @krebiozen @FillmoreWhite @TonyBaduy @whykeepitup @dunningsback @FvckYourFear @JuneCacao @BreezerGalway @AngryFl…

@geoffmiller2984 @g_gosden You have really set yourself up Im afraid because the definitive study said the product prevented transmission. Its here , in the results section I quote it says "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 " which means

@crianza @Angie16492493 @Deframing23 https://t.co/s44vvD4iBw https://t.co/dpFRx2r40r https://t.co/saOCxWiSWc Gern geschehen.

@MattRomanoII @ggreenwald They did release their data. https://t.co/zplfaBdLlw

@SynthIge @BadVaccineTakes Here's the science: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@ShadowKn0ws @anish_koka You have not read a single study. If you had, you wouldn't make such an ignorant claim. I'll send you one link, and then after you give whatever reason you're going to give to not believe it, I'll block you and we can be done wasti

RT @crabb_vicki: @ToBornin @SkepticalMutant @TheFrankmanMN @JCDeardeuff @JT4TheReturn @iXeno @cappsie @handmadekathy @IainMulady @doritmi @…

RT @crabb_vicki: @ToBornin @SkepticalMutant @TheFrankmanMN @JCDeardeuff @JT4TheReturn @iXeno @cappsie @handmadekathy @IainMulady @doritmi @…

@ToBornin @SkepticalMutant @TheFrankmanMN @JCDeardeuff @JT4TheReturn @iXeno @cappsie @handmadekathy @IainMulady @doritmi @TruthTwt @Izzitreally2 @Jccalmond2 @Monstercoyliar @krebiozen @TweetOfSteiner @Augusti03401363 @ianfmusgrave @BlueLionBlog @thisisnoth

@thebigwave11 Besides repeating misinformation word for word, which is all you’re doing, are you able to provide a critical evaluation of the following, with comments on the robustness of the methodology & statistical power of the data? https://t.co/Yo

@_TheAncientOne_ @DrEliDavid In the original study, they talked about "protection". It's now well know, it's less than 1% effective, hasn't stopped the transmission, driving immune escape variants in injected population. https://t.co/q0Wn9lpjBe

@VanSophia @severson1977 @VigilantFox @hugh_mankind 1. the original trials were RCT's: https://t.co/5ZIOuWabfl 2. numerous secondary studies from different places in the world validating reduction severe disease since. 3. flu kills 12,000-60,000 in U.S. a

@BryceKnechtel @HeyNurseKat @jestdeserts @Martina @mcgilead Cool. Since you think you are so very smart, here are 3 studies that were just part of the studies completed before approval. Do explain the flaws in methodology and analysis. I look forward to yo

@1635HenryMorgan @healthbyjames entire statement incorrect. randomized controlled trials for covid vaccines: https://t.co/Q5xSiNzFfk. vitamin d failed randomized controlled trials https://t.co/6DiTpXZpTy

@AGreenroyd1958 @CXineax @AmandaINC @ArisKatzourakis There is no “if it is fully approved” as I sent you link to FDA fully approving it so no ifs. Second, it was tested in clinical trials https://t.co/6l7NRYem5w and https://t.co/I68P3Agz5N Next time do som

@Patrick_JOJO @pam33771 https://t.co/S81iPoaqPw Non, tout est transparent et public. Vous avez 2 ans et demi de retard.

@JjinUk64 @robfirstname @IanCopeland5 You mean this pfizer trial that only saw 4 SAEs in a group of 21,720? Stop lying. https://t.co/apcUPcE6Dh

@kokacav @pam33771 Elle est là l'étude, publiée et validée. https://t.co/S81iPoaqPw

@BryceKnechtel @DrLoupis A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. https://t.co/AeKiV44V49

@EntycaOfficiel @lePlaymobil28 @MenagerFabienn1 @LouisCapet13 Puisque vous avez l'air de vous y connaître.. 😏https://t.co/S81iPoaqPw

@Vortexsh3dding @DominiekC @IT_smee_GEN @MarKes1900 @Dimitri081970 @JohanHoeksm @Food4ears @ing_thegame @HaHaGentherapie @MarkWendrich @ErikCumps @Edward_Wouters @Derevenger1 @BreedamLouis @AnoNiem36353870 @SergeLebrun16 @DirkvanLinth @RoelsMaarten @Br_Chr

@anmin1012 デマはそっちなんだよなあ。 https://t.co/X5MKoeaA18 https://t.co/G23moliMKs https://t.co/vwEHIi8YGN https://t.co/BCia5ETNNV https://t.co/rJO3LUXXLn https://t.co/j74mOAMrTh https://t.co/dqkSLhcpRH https://t.co/YGjAeASBdG https://t.co/PRtlWp8GfO

@etqwetCSlyuUcyi @MHLWitter 反撃も何も満身創痍なんだよなあ。 https://t.co/X5MKoeaA18 https://t.co/G23moliMKs https://t.co/vwEHIi8YGN https://t.co/BCia5ETNNV https://t.co/rJO3LUXXLn https://t.co/j74mOAMrTh https://t.co/dqkSLhcpRH https://t.co/YGjAeASBdG https://t.co/PRtl

Anti-vaxxers tell me these tests were never done. Odd as hell: Here’s a report on one of the trials. 2/n Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine - PubMed https://t.co/HoM3LJMrk8

@plumber_dragon @HeyNurseKat @DrCanuckMD @jonathanstea 4/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1

@IvanLoans @IanCopeland5 DRs went first. We got vaccinated, willingly, first. Side effects were available from the initial trial. Published December 10, 2020. https://t.co/Vgf3MZY5MG

@averros271828 @GloriaJH @stkirsch @Babydoll921961 So, it's all a conspiracy theory? Everything that doesn't fit your belief is a lie? What would convince you that P3 has been completed? It's easily demonstrable. Here are the phase 2/3 results. https:

@DominiekC @IT_smee_GEN @MarKes1900 @Vortexsh3dding @Dimitri081970 @JohanHoeksm @Food4ears @ing_thegame @HaHaGentherapie @MarkWendrich @ErikCumps @Edward_Wouters @Derevenger1 @BreedamLouis @AnoNiem36353870 @SergeLebrun16 @DirkvanLinth @RoelsMaarten @Br_Chr

@licenciaro @LuislS37191487 @FVT2012 @peligroso5g @Nochedelossecr1 @salud_mariel @olgaayala6 @BarriolaDaniel @csfabbiani @DrDanielSalinas @soberanista5 @normalidadradio @RCLatin2 @youruguayo @dariofal73 @Janete73057568 @GustavSLorier @DraPatriciaDeNa @Sciu

@joshux321 @dr_jon_l @jason_willz1 @andrewbostom What study? No, a non-peer-reviewed Substack article from a non-expert paranoid crackpot like Fenton is not a "study". https://t.co/4fpLaWgVvc

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

@laurensbuijs @TimonLeeuw "Zoek op Google Scholar" ipv met concrete voorbeelden komen. 1 op 1 overgenomen uit de wappie handleiding. Kijk hier eens naar. Met je domme gelul over mRNA. https://t.co/myBgv3QkZ7

@Meagain10411919 @PampireRN @KissickBill @RepThomasMassie you probably think pfizer should conduct the study themselves too. stop pushing this bullshit.

@Yibril08 @RocketWolf89 @Carbonized_1 @creditannie @catturd2 False. My brother literally volunteered to be in a trial. They did do trials. https://t.co/jw70WN54sd

RT @RightoidBS: @stkirsch Data like Pfizer's phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 43448 participants which found 95% efficacy of preventi…

RT @nyuckie_yucks: @MidwesternDoc Pfizer stopped phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this v…

@literarysolace @VikiLovesFACS It underwent preclinical, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III clinical trials and post marketing surveillance before approval. It has an excellent safety record and was very effective. https://t.co/M3Q0VM9ecE

@cryptokevLMAC @trumper_tantrum @ScottMechlowicz @RobSchneider Ok, no problem! https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf

@Voice0vTheFree @MMeBlackSheep 1) avoir « toutes » les infos est impossible 2) certaines infos ne peuvent être obtenus qu’après vaccination à grande échelle 3) il faut >1 an pour ces résultats beaucoup seraient morts. 4) l’essentiel était là: protection

@jenenews @a_husby That was officially published Dec 2020, but they had data by Oct 2020 https://t.co/iqxV4fpZ6Z

@NoUse4aName781 @MauritzPreller @IanCopeland5 @enzolytics @intel https://t.co/6l7NRYem5w