@kevinnbass Hi @kevinbass. Fauci's conclusion was reasonable at the time. 95% efficacy against even mild infection in the phase 3 trial. True, transmission was not measured, but it was reasonable to believe you can't spread a virus you don't have. https://
@Christii3131 @thereal_truther @GrouchoMarxis13 @TorySnyc Point to where it says that: https://t.co/A0KhDVXvue
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@borstel_v @unbekannt799 @Karl_Lauterbach Ergänzung - Quellen von Biontech/Pfizer mit den echten Zahlen: https://t.co/u95V2wNyjO https://t.co/HE8bb8kNZ8 https://t.co/n4gxkJVENJ
@ThoughtFor3dom @Sharky_vs_Evil @qandamazon @_johnbye During the Pfizer RCT, 2 vaccine recipients died (unrelated to the vaccine) and 4 placebo recipients died. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 among vaccine recipients and 162 among placebo recipients. Read
@Tosiebear @jason_willz1 @Ba_____aa @GeorgeFareed2 @btysonmd @EduEngineer @FLSurgeonGen @P_McCulloughMD "The shot had no evidence either." This is a lie. It is in direct conflict with objective reality. Pfizer randomized controlled trial of 43,548 parti
@TimeToWakeup62 @dr_withrow @naomirwolf Glad you asked!! See, if you have studies backing up what you say, you're not afraid to post links to them. https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@YT55574230 What? Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/n57yrQkQJc
@SenatorDurbin Remember when Pfizer claimed "The results demonstrate that Covid-19 can be prevented by immunization"? (p. 11) Turns out, that was a lie https://t.co/YxTc8cLBS0
@MichaelWegene11 @Ella_von_T @sabi_ri Auch da lügen Sie nachweißlich. Dies sind alles Einträge bei Google vor oder kurz nach Impfbeginn. Und nur ein kleiner Teil davon. Hier noch eine Studie von 2020 https://t.co/KShQoLhFUl https://t.co/Zj02Vojiu2
@kevinnbass This is the most common study I see cited to defend the "virus mutated so we didn't know" claim: https://t.co/yPItWtnveJ
@toxavit @Marc15557624 @Markus_Krall @sascha_m_k Ich denke nicht, dass hier das eine mit dem anderen zu tun hat. Vor allem kann man die Argumentation einfach umdrehen (wenn Sie so ein Problem mit "ungetesteten" Technologien haben, warum dann auf Dual-Fluid
@dreasmo not related to a vaccine, not statistically significant, not all cause mortality, this was tracked in the mrna RCT's as well. https://t.co/gqXhOqIIL9
@DocDeezWhat @Amir9999 @nolablue79 @_HughJasole_ Here's my evidence 😂 https://t.co/SQFU6TJQt2
@dreasmo false. https://t.co/gqXhOqIIL9
@JjinUk64 @goofyfootgaijin @profnfenton This paper tells you exactly why not everyone progressed through to the final analysis. There's nothing concerning about it: https://t.co/1HqdF8vBXN https://t.co/g35WmzcoGt
@KellerNews @ZDF Geschenkt. Es ist ein korrupter, skrupelloser Haufen. Im Dezember 2020 kam das Paper zu Biontech heraus: Versuchsgruppe mit 21720 Verumprobanden über 2 Monate. Daraufhin wurde ein Impfprogramm für Milliarden! Menschen gestartet. Sie lügen
@Amir9999 @nolablue79 @DocDeezWhat @_HughJasole_ If your poll says people believe there was only supposed to be one shot, people's memories are faulty. https://t.co/SQFU6TJQt2
@nolablue79 @Amir9999 @DocDeezWhat @_HughJasole_ The Pfizer vaccine was marketed as a two shot vaccine, with 21 days between each shot. It was never intended to be "one shot and done". https://t.co/YFruPjjEd7 The BBC wrote in Dec 2020 that Covid vaccines c
@alexandrosM Covid-19 Vaccines May Not Prevent Nasal SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Asymptomatic Transmission - published online Dec 2020 https://t.co/9mjczYHEfD Pfizer trial results in NEJM: https://t.co/LfCTWmRNNz
@chaosimkittel Tja: Ohne Impfarm - Keine Wirkung. Ganz klar. (Hab gerade nochmal nachgesehen, war tatsächlich bei 80%) https://t.co/ld7tCliz5A
@james__eu @SurfingsC00L @ksenijapavlovic @ABridgen @YouTube When you're the one funding it. https://t.co/hDZunuqO2w https://t.co/WE1QtJ3WdH
@PP_Broadcasts @KPujdak @k_pyrc @PBasiukiewicz Otóż wyjaśnię - prezes na rynki rozwinięte Pfizera stwierdziła, że przed grudniem 2020 roku nie badano wpływu Comirnaty na transmisję wirusa. Przypominam, że badania kliniczne do tego nie służą i nigdy nie sł
Pour les EI non grave, il suffit de comparer les données des essais cliniques avec les données du VAERS. Par exemple pour la fièvre: -16% et 11% https://t.co/sEQK92M7cF - 0.01% VAERS https://t.co/RfbgDdi7lL Facteur de sous-déclaration >1000. Pharmacovig
@alexchtwit @elonmusk Dude, you have never downloaded the trials and pulled out a calculator, have you ? https://t.co/mHnjM2tczI
@9aorX0CwQzIEjVj @ad7d2935094a4f2 https://t.co/ydOEINWFre 何がどうデマなの？RCTで予防効果 立証されてるんだが？ ちなみに、オミクロンにも感染予防効果 報告されてるが。 まさか、統計による有意な減少って 意味わからない？
@admiralpat @PPoderetour @alphabetamale17 @OMN1SAM @TheOmniLiberal the 1st link you linked is the same trial with the same authors and same start date. mine: https://t.co/alyUWIiw0J yours: https://t.co/IQjegZCFY3 both by pfizer the 2nd link is not a tria
@mininukacola @PPoderetour @alphabetamale17 @OMN1SAM @TheOmniLiberal Here are some: https://t.co/qH7uTsUioY https://t.co/KzLpgypixK <- this one is more a meta-analysis(analyzing collection of trials)
@Rossi86057607 @Bubbewappieurk Hoeveel wil je er? Kan de hele avond vullen voor je. https://t.co/haOjs6xD5v Wil je iets over zwangerschap? Myocarditis? Wil je iets over de bijwerkingen van Covid? Maar goed, nu is het eerst jouw beurt toch? ;)
@tyoGenb0 ファイザーの大規模臨床試験の結果、これでしたっけ？😓 https://t.co/wfvgFVlJIy
@ci2twit @Bannedforlife69 @TNT_SweetMarie @QBJuan1776 @Jrsatty @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase 1, II, III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020. Some da
@MaxieJaxn @gorskon That just isn't true. Vaccine manufacturers have to provide such a huge amount of safety information before they are approved. Have you read the Pfizer vaccine RCT? https://t.co/YFruPjjEd7
@addishunt @naomirwolf See ya clown. I’ll leave you with ACTUAL trials, as opposed to blogs on twitter. Silly kid. https://t.co/bL3VsNhjVe
@vaxxdeath @Beyourownmind @naomirwolf Never tested on humans? What a ridiculous liar. https://t.co/PA4PAp0h0w
@leni_nix @JamieSale Except all those human animals. https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@AsskSlapper @Mr_Magoo5 @CovidianCritic @SwaledaleMutton @TheChiefNerd @NNutritionista You are lying. The vaccines were tested to see if they reduce disease or severe disease. This was known when vaccines came out. Later data showed they reduce transmissio
@agorizt @FriedoAlzheimer @welt Da ist die Studie. Könnten Sie mal die Stellen zeigen, die ihre Behauptung stützen? https://t.co/O1VrWVDHw5
@GlamGabber @Jeff__Perrine @unhealthytruth Wait a minute. Let me get this straight. You don’t know how to find the most famous clinical trials of the last 50 years? But you are absolutely sure that the vaccines are dangerous? are you joking? https://t.
@CovidConfusion @Jikkyleaks @kalypso1066 @drdrew @VikiLovesFACS @AskDrDrew Two vaccine recipients died, 4 placebo https://t.co/M3Q0VM9ecE
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@DRvendominant @HackedYayonne11 https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij Regarde l’étude clinique mon innocent 😂😂🤣
@GaryMullennix @catturd2 Here’s the Pfizer study published in the NEJM, the most highly regarded peer review journal in the United States. You can look up the other one yourself. https://t.co/6uYfDUimhT
@riscolamerica @rubiaandasuelta @BeatrizTalegon Adjunto un estudio publicado el 31/12/20 con 43 548 participantes, 21 720 con PFizer y 21 728 con placebo. Entre los 10 casos de Covid-19 grave con inicio después de la primera dosis, 9 ocurrieron en receptor
@credibilty_basi @aimeeterese This was not a secret. It was published by Pfizer in their first study on its efficacy. They literally said further research needed to be done to determine its impact on transmission to unvaccinated people. https://t.co/HQQsRa
@Bannedforlife69 @ci2twit @TNT_SweetMarie @QBJuan1776 @Jrsatty @DeniseRa1 @drscott_atlanta All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase 1, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020. Some
@ChrisWaldburger @eNCA "A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccine". https://t.co/8H1Zp4rJm7
@k2kQue You have been lied to. Gene therapy edits genes, but mRNA vaccines do not and cannot alter genes therefore they are not gene therapy. Here's the Pfizer vaccine clinical trial, which reached all its endpoints successfully. https://t.co/YFruPjjEd7
@MinorityView @red90rover @fitterhappierAJ This is saline. https://t.co/N7LnHfeZ1M
@bigmt_37 @jontester This is the phase 3 trial from the NIH: https://t.co/6QhFPFKSX8
@rdrgabb @aintelectuala @DrBrunoGino O mesmo artigo na nejm e pubmed: https://t.co/5OVglqhD2V https://t.co/Une34HSWJo
@WitchDrTim @LionAdvocacy Explain. Peer-reviewed. Early Dec 2020. https://t.co/R1Z0YCzGe6
@WitchDrTim @caritatenerife You missed this one? https://t.co/R1Z0YCzGe6
@ACGermany2 @KlocknerMarcus Beide Aussagen sind falsch. Die mRNA Impfstoffe erfüllen die Definition von Impfung und z.B. hier ist das Ergebnis der Phase 3 Studie, die die Wirksamkeit bzgl Infektion belegt https://t.co/d5QC7fkesf
@mahmudme01 @thereal_truther \2 then i went and checked the paper on the pfizer trials were they say were they were done... 0 Bulgaria https://t.co/306UHQR1AR https://t.co/0THpiobyAU
@Diego77197524 @christianperez Te he pasado del covid, aquí tienes de las vacunas. Elige la que más ilusión te haga. https://t.co/agFdbynBSa https://t.co/rYZv0QDudM https://t.co/U29B6Vdj4l
@landryphilippe3 @arikouts Pas de l'humour, juste de la précision scinetifique https://t.co/vqKhiP42JG
@borges82864038 @futuraexbbbvick @Daniela_AFK @reumalho Eu posso publicar centenas de estudos científicos que refutam esses daí que você citou, mas você está mergulhado na sua bolha ideológica que não te permite que qualquer evidência científica te faça pe
@CLOUTECHRISTIN2 @laurenceteamhcl @silvano_trotta @CaudeHenrion Ici. Vous avez d'autres questions ?https://t.co/zyMaAlgR3r https://t.co/vbIb1Kcm5X
@smartwookiee Heyoooooo Hahahaha smashhhhhed https://t.co/6RYCSiWYwq
@smartwookiee Oh lordy take the L already hahahaha https://t.co/6RYCSiXwlY
@smartwookiee Whooopsyyyyy https://t.co/6RYCSiXwlY
@smartwookiee Nawwww look at the loser losing again hahahaha this is so easy. https://t.co/6RYCSiXwlY
@smartwookiee Whooopsyyyyy Take the L. I win. Again. Hahahaha this is so easy. https://t.co/6RYCSiXwlY
Du genre de cette daube ? https://t.co/3aHsaDOAhZ
@EddyCormon @BkassaNamoomba @fvdemocratie @thierrybaudet https://t.co/vzw5ZCDcuF Nog maar een keer dan. Hier, de resultaten van fase 3 voor Pfizer
@Mariko000666 @HIKA_hikaru_ @x_x_xxxx_xxxx https://t.co/9sCwCVEj5f では、なぜ国際共同治験の結果が出てるんですか？
@AtmCO2isTooLow @Ernestonewage @LetsGoBrando45 And ANOTHER, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled peer reviewed clinical trial published in the most respected medical journal in the world showing zero side effects from the vaccine. it’s just so st
@murmler @MIGO_Offiziell Bitte die Zulassungsstudie von Polack et al. lesen. Endpunkt war symptomatische Infektion ja/nein. Die Daten über die Schwere der Verläufe findet man versteckt im Supplementary Appendix mit einer VE von 75% und einem Konfidenzinter
@Thunderseven79 @LakovosJustice There’s multiple trials, but Pfizer’s one reported its results in December 2020: https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT
@AUPatriot2001 @MikeMaroney79 @LindaSc81848664 @tkradio @AdamKinzinger @RNCResearch @wef How about actual medical journals: https://t.co/0cPJLDk80T
@jaredkolb05 @danielkotzin @jaredpolis @RepThomasMassie Here it is. from 20 December 2020. https://t.co/CWR1V1luFO
@j0nathandavis @LakovosJustice No. Pfizer’s trial alone had more than 40,000 people in it. Moderna’s was more than 30,000. https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT https://t.co/fJOksklZq2
@LoveNegan @MazdyS @LakovosJustice They didn’t. You got tricked by lies. Their study was published publicly in December 2020. https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT
RT @TravAlvord: @UnacceptableN @chamchuk_nick @jeffgilchrist @SteveWh48941132 Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a…
@UnacceptableN @chamchuk_nick @jeffgilchrist @SteveWh48941132 Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested their vaccine in a huge clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against symtomatic infection, and published the results in the New E
@Judi2Bee @LakovosJustice Moderna’s is an mRNA vaccine, and so is Pfizer’s. Their results were also published in December 2020: https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT
@TerryC800 @Lilia47100568 @LakovosJustice Yes they were, here's their phase 3 results: Pfizer (43,448 people): https://t.co/noVU8gLSyT Moderna (30,420 people): https://t.co/fJOksklZq2
@jhnghmn @glenpyle @1goodtern Covid vaccine safe and effective https://t.co/M3Q0VM9ecE
@LDRdrpepperpuss @troonytoons Nice that the studies in your article were funded by BioNTech and Pfizer. 😂😂😂 You’re too dumb to see that you’re a willing test rat. https://t.co/PP3prkFZ5U
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@HomoApocrifo @PratilloPalmira @fdragoni @AnnaAscani Questi i dati di pfizer pubblicati 2021, ovvio che non conoscono i dati a lungo termine. 4 influencer ti hanno detto che esiste un complotto mondiale, si fanno un sacco di soldi e tu ci credi. Hai ragion
@MeltedJonSnow @VincentGRIEU1 @Acermendax Attéré plus exactement : https://t.co/cxQGmsyVSc
@DianaLovell15 @Frank12Campbell @HolyLawler @stkirsch Here’s the publication. Can you show me which page? Im having a hard time finding it. https://t.co/UvAAQhuI5m
@CastAwayOne1 @Roadras91467253 @IanCopeland5 So what is this then, Cast Away? https://t.co/JXzcmsO95k
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
@GenoesParan @JoomiKim1 Regarding the original Pfizer trial - Something is foul im the state of the evidence: https://t.co/eKSLzqJnfg
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…
RT @Jikkyleaks: By how many patients did Pfizer claim to have seen a benefit in their trial? 162 vs 8, gave you a "95% reduction in PCR po…