@JAYHOSMER @AnneBla78816002 For yet another, "Communist?" Seriously? I know communists. They hate Democrats. The Democratic Party is a neoliberal capitalist imperialist party, which should be obvious. Anyway, back to the vaccine: https://t.co/RURI2oXPN1
@Covid_Vax_ @Sudo_Nonimus @jimmy_dore Here's over 70, you gullible carny mark. After 13 billion Covid shots, where's your proof they're all sick or dying? https://t.co/lIAuu9Ea25
@BaloneyFauci @EndWokeness The FDA doesn’t do testing. They evaluate data from tests. The Pfizer vaccine has undergone many independent studies. Here’s one. https://t.co/vaPX8gBEbX
@fastro_cidel @Jaysday32 @Cynikaldoc @lau56 @JackPosobiec I’m not sure what you’re talking about specifically but I know what to expect when I see clinical data. I also know how vaccines work so I didn’t have unrealistic expectations & didn’t draw fals
@RaySahelian_MD @DCLaurie89 @tweetannylee @Dad_Explains_ @hypertalk_ai @ScottAdamsSays Here for Pfizer: https://t.co/5bgXNLDSec. Here for Moderna: https://t.co/u0ZTQUwo8p . Both December 2020.
@Jim12424626 @domainsgeneral @DrEliDavid @Project_Veritas No clinical trial? You clearly don’t know what you are talking about: https://t.co/c0kDr6JyrO
@knarren_rik @ChrisAalberts @laurensbuijs Het artikel over het Pfizer vaccin staat op https://t.co/0HrbU1M61G Het is voor het eerst gepubliceerd op 10 december 2020. Jonge-aarde creationisten beweren dat de Aarde <10.000 jaar oud is. Dat is ongeveer he
@Ydennekde @Karrie527743 @TexasLindsay_ @JamesOKeefeIII @JamesOKeefelll What doesn’t exist? Wake up! https://t.co/b3gwg78PbD
@RandomIndivid01 @mtracey The doctors are in on it as well. https://t.co/yeO2md53ky
@PaulMiil @nationalpost It's not a strawman when it's true. Do you accept this reseach? Exactly! https://t.co/DrM7AXod8c
@MarkKen20510303 @mattletiss7 Numbers from here… https://t.co/BNrXGQkyab
@ArcherHolistics @ichudov @DrJBhattacharya Please explain to me how exactly this isn't a double blind, placebo controlled, randomized study. Please be very specific. I'm trying to understand what you could possibly be talking about because you sound dera
@Concord1683 @RonnyJacksonTX I don't need to go through the headache of FOIA request. Why would I do that when it's publicly published information? Here's one just to get you started. I'm sure you'll read it oh-so-carefully. https://t.co/8UhNYFm5QY
@EdgarfebarriosF @VargasrFabio @JulioRazona @CNNEE tu sola presencia es el consentimiento informado. Ninguna vacuna a lo largo de la historia requirió consentimiento informado. Y te dejo la evidencia científica del fin de la fase 3 con lo q deja de ser ex
@DrReganG @DrSusanOliver1 They were correct when they said that the Pfizer vaccine was 95% effective at preventing sar cov 2 infections. Do you think they made up the trial data? https://t.co/Oec08KKVaK
@TheAbhorrent1 @derShasta @HarryJ_McC @AllBiteNoBark88 “Admits” as if they were trying to hide it 🙄 The clinical trials were designed to test safety and efficacy. That’s it. They even state it in the paper that was published way back in 2020. Not sure why
@GermangirlT @ButHisEmails @SwaledaleMutton @btcgrant @Doctor_Eric_B 3/ Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you
@VPrasadMDMPH Remember when they told us to NOT do our own "research"? https://t.co/ccY3uOuHjj https://t.co/5Ck9UyXENj
@VPrasadMDMPH Me too...and I am not a physician... it was very easy to understand right out of the gate RE: the C19 vax -the paper CLEARLY SHOWS trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. They lied. They don't deserve trust. https://t.co/kmxiHPSlMK
@billygood86 @byrnes44 @BuckSexton The problem is I can provide you with these all day long but you lack a basic understanding of just how important this data is https://t.co/OpexaXNi1s
@GermangirlT @SwaledaleMutton @btcgrant @Doctor_Eric_B But I'll help you out - here's the phase 3 results from NEJM: https://t.co/53ez5gux8s
@Spongeybobby99 @clackajacka @CNN Who told you that? The results of the clinical trials (against a different variant), published in December 2020 did not make these claims. Do you remember flu vaccine? https://t.co/drI0M4z3z3
@TheAbhorrent1 @YourFerntasy @HarryJ_McC @AllBiteNoBark88 Here’s the results of Pfizer’s clinical trials, published in NEJM in December of 2020. I guess your “little bit of research” didn’t include 5 seconds of Googling. https://t.co/x7Uo1oeKzm
@UGymbo @DrJamesOlsson Four serious adverse events for Pfizer vaccine Phase3 trial. Yes: 4. None lethal. So where are you pulling those 1300 that you "heard of"? https://t.co/w9aeeqRCKY
@vsdevils33 @BFMTV https://t.co/OBwWCkcaoz 31 décembre 2020, on savait déjà que les tests sur la transmission n’étaient pas faits.
@SullivanChad @JesseRayAkins1 @DrAseemMalhotra We do though. And extensive immunobridging to support boosters. This is only one example. Yes, AEs happen but they are exceedingly rare & all professional medical orgs have concluded the benefits of vaccin
@VickeyMax @healthbyjames Please provide a critical evaluation of the following and point out your perceived flaws in the robustness of the methodology & statistical power of the data. Please include your thoughts on whether the primary endpoints were
This is based on Pfizer's OWN clinical study data, which FDA - and EVERYONE - had as of December 10, 2020! https://t.co/GrJKI7wzpY You MUST scroll down to the Appendix link to obtain the data used in the table. Pfizer-FDA did NOT want us to know actual r
@JessLehna @veroniquegenest L'étude initiale a d'ailleurs été publiée en 2020. https://t.co/52eEaYp8Go Il faudrait vous mettre un peu au courant.
@FRDMFGHTR5000 @MelissaLMRogers Well, you can look them up on the FDA site and/or any number of reputable, peer reviewed journals, pinhead. https://t.co/tDJDK8z4QU
@naekbus @AlphaZenyth @StopPlandemit @elonmusk Basi banget.....para ulama tomur tengah dah duluan disuntik pfizer dari dulu...😷 Kalo mau agak sains dikit, nih bukti test study nya..😷 https://t.co/TMc2Ix6Lum
@John30864782 @AlastairMcA30 @Johnincarlisle @YouTube research in centres of excellence. “Not appropriately tested in humans”? Total nonsense.🙄 https://t.co/bh4TTNKzOv
@TimothyEaster8 This is seriously the most embarrassing tweet I’ve seen on this platform. You seriously aren’t just learning now that there were human clinical trials for every Covid vaccine? https://t.co/OpexaXNi1s
@SullivanChad @DrAseemMalhotra Please provide a critical evaluation of the following including your opinions on the robustness of the methodology, the statistical power of the data, the appropriateness of the primary endpoints & whether they were met.
@scgarcin Los coranovirus de conocen hace décadas y sobre eso es que se logró hacer una vacuna. Por eso se puede adecuar a cada nueva cepa. El éxito es incuestionable. Solo pelotudos como vos que no saben un carajo de medicina la cuestionan. Más pruebas h
@J060170 @alphafay435 @healthbyjames Can you provide a critical evaluation of the following? Do you find fault with the robustness of the methodology or the statistical power of the data? What about the appropriateness of the primary endpoints? I look forw
@saposen @vzhSsxNonC7PKSt @33000kt まず第一に『実験』じゃない。 治験は終わってて+αのデータを取ってるだけ。 https://t.co/06NUJCWw01 『戦後最大の超過死亡』も分母を考えろ。 致死率0.5%でも日本人全員が罹ったとして63万は死ぬ計算。 インフルエンザがほぼ駆逐されるレベルで対策してその数ならむしろ頑張ってる方だろ。
@tedcruz Prove it Read it and weep. https://t.co/6uYfDUiU7r
@CryptoSala Oh sorry I can’t comment on fictionalized scenarios. Maybe you could provide a critical evaluation of the following? Do your criticisms lie in the robustness of the methodology or the statistical power of the data? I look forward to your detail
@ScottAdamsSays @Jikkyleaks @JFGariepy @leelasik “the antibody has no pathway to the lung” maxim applies foremost. Reading the Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy study, combined with Bayesian likelihoods ( age, bmi, vit D level, and access to early tx) might ha
@jossjossjoss001 @MeltedJonSnow @nicolasberrod @TheLancet Je dis juste que vous n'avez pas lu les essais cliniques déterminant l'effectivité des vaccins ni toutes les études qui ont suivi. Lisez avant de critiquer en inventant des calculs dignes de l'école
@PaulaPauleena @RunRun94025061 Jaa. Tämäkin vertaisarvioitu tutkimus vain kuulopuhetta? Eikä todellakaan ainoa. Julkaistu joulukuun 2020 alussa. Ennen lupien myöntämistä. Tutkittu yli 40 000:lla. https://t.co/R1Z0YCAe3E
@KiddMoxy @Falkenlurch @G403Cowan @liz_churchill8 It has not been admitted at all. https://t.co/PBDydtSPez
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
RT @nyuckie_yucks: @davidzweig They terminated phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this vac…
@Theonewhoknow5 @TiceRichard https://t.co/ahc1iQzwBZ Here is the Pfizer data on their clinical trial. All the Pfizer documents released just confirmed this was an accurate summary. Stop listening to AV BS when you haven't even taken 2 minutes to research
@nbreavington @jimmy_dore The Dec. 2020 paper CLEARLY SHOWS the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual getting symptoms or severe disease. https://t.co/kmxiHPSl
RT @tenebra99: @MadSpatter @DrCJohns 1. The vaccine went through all required phases of testing. Here's the trial. https://t.co/eyM1vyJuis…
@LastToTheTParty @SkylarDavison1 @BadMedicalTakes No they don’t. https://t.co/rmdosAgWWi
RT @dfreedman7: @MadSpatter I was one of the 43,548 subjects in the Pfizer trial. This is my vaccine card. https://t.co/ZO45n32f2v https://…
@BretWeinstein Absolute B.S. Your sole rationalizing is to grift$ to people who found grade 9 to be the hardest 3yrs of their life. There were tens of thousands of people who partook in various COVID vaccine trials, here is an example one from a credible s
@BretWeinstein Tú que masticas un poco de castellano, te recomiendo investigues lo de @RouxAugusto, y los detalles, lo granular de las pruebas de Pfizer realizadas en Argentina bajo la 'supervisión' de Fernando Pedro Polack. https://t.co/gXUxN49GRl
@Leonine35 "Although the study was designed to follow participants for safety and efficacy for 2 years after the second dose [...] it cannot be in the context of maintaining a placebo group for the planned follow-up period of 2 years" https://t.co/ER6yxjXV
@davidzweig They terminated phase 3 safety trials 2 yrs early: "Assessment of long-term safety and efficacy for this vaccine will occur, but it cannot be in the context of maintaining a placebo group for the planned follow-up period of 2 years after the se
@davidzweig "Although the study was designed to follow participants for safety and efficacy for 2 years after the second dose [...] ethical and practical barriers prevent following placebo recipients for 2 years without offering active immunization" https:
@Dirty_Diver_ @JulieShireySat1 @johnhawkinsrwn @JackPosobiec You never refuted it. You actually provided evidence that unvaccinated die at higher rates with pfizers own study. Seriously, saying you proved something doesn't make it so when it happened in yo
@Dirty_Diver_ @catturd2 You mean like the reality that unvaccinated people continually die at higher rates per capita? If you would like an anecdote. Go visit diamonds grave. https://t.co/PxF44oZ2VG
@Dirty_Diver_ @_WhyreYaTrollin @JulieShireySat1 @johnhawkinsrwn @JackPosobiec This is the (Pfizer) data used in the study you quoted. I’m positive Moderna data will be similar. AEs, SAEs are expected in any vax. They include anaphylaxis, etc. Also notable
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
@BillSantini1 @rick6240 @PrinceParfait3 @MarcRenaud22 @elonmusk @ScottAdamsSays Human trials. The fact that millions and millions of people have received a full dose of the vaccinations and the recommendations haven't changed from what is now a humongous d
@HeyNurseKat @MadSpatter @tenebra99 @TravIsScience @thesassymicrobe As you said Kat. Excuse me but what the phoque? Phase I is made to test PK and tolerance/safety, Phase II/III efficacy (Phase II is small-scale efficacy study, expanded in Phase III), Phas
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
@whisperhunter39 @GeoDaviss @catturd2 Here's the full test: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@7sealshortime @hammers43000966 @MagicMerlinV @TRN1993 @DavidJuurlink Did you even read the original trials? Here I will link it for you
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
@MadSpatter I was one of the 43,548 subjects in the Pfizer trial. This is my vaccine card. https://t.co/ZO45n32f2v https://t.co/O1u2Tywi3B
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jtoc_toc @JReinerMD Re: "They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%."…
RT @MadSpatter: Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical res…
RT @jtoc_toc: @JReinerMD They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%. So out of 50mil roughly…
Probably the worst "study" I've ever read. Maybe this individual doesn't actually know the 4 study phases in a clinical research trial and that they begin AFTER the animal studies. 🤔
RT @AtomsksSanakan: @jtoc_toc @JReinerMD Re: "They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%."…
@SylvainL_Cote @SMaroufle @Sonic_urticant @raoult_didier Il y a l'etude de phase III qui est randomisé table s5 9 formes grave chez placebo contre 1 chez vacciné https://t.co/DZBt1t303x Ensuite aprés la mise sur le marché ce sont les études retrospective q
@MadSpatter @DrCJohns 1. The vaccine went through all required phases of testing. Here's the trial. https://t.co/eyM1vyJuis 2. You ar not concerned about Covid?
@jtoc_toc @JReinerMD Re: "They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%." Please feel free to show where you got that, making sure to compare to the *placebo* group as well. https://t.co/gFcGqlq4ax https://t.co
@dystopian_DU You mean like this one. https://t.co/J5LvzgcGH1
@smublvd01 @DrAseemMalhotra This is the NEJM abstract from Dec 2020. Maybe depends where you get your news? https://t.co/DP0Ym5pLJK https://t.co/XgNR52Xiga
@ladoodles Lol google is your friend https://t.co/5ZIOuWabfl
RT @jtoc_toc: @JReinerMD They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%. So out of 50mil roughly…
@JReinerMD They rate of serve adverse events in the Pfizer P3 trial after 2nd dose was just under 2%. So out of 50mil roughly 1 million people would have a serious adverse event if all things stayed equal. No big deal I guess. https://t.co/2r3yIyjRGj
@kHellstr @AjanmiesMieti Tutkimusta mistä? Näitähän on (kaiketi eniten mistään rokotteesta ikinä) alusta asti. Muun muassa: https://t.co/wYCmNaI6mi https://t.co/ocyr6CRhuE
@jrzygrl719 @otter25702 @FoxNews Neither Fauci or Birx made a comment that “you couldn’t catch it or spread it” if you’re vaccinated. As far as the evidence that it dramatically reduces death or hospitalizations: Pfizer: https://t.co/lz8qm7FBTu Moderna
RT @Dexterinzo1: @RepMTG The studies are publicly available. Have been for years. Here's one: https://t.co/ided7uRHfU
@thewatcherpnw @catturd2 Bruh, studies have been available for years. Here's one I found in under a minute: https://t.co/ided7uR9qm
@MyCriterion2022 @deen30991110 @snowwhi77612430 @dahmachi @MieMnss5213 @mFa2S0w2fGir00l @1ooEqdGcwOh6WWi @thunderstruck13 ワクチンはむしろ徹底的に調べられて承認されている。 今行われているのは+αの調査。 Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 Vaccine | NEJM https://t.co/l1N0H9Mc1R
@RepMTG The studies are publicly available. Have been for years. Here's one: https://t.co/ided7uRHfU