RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
@Zachariahskylab “even thought they told the public it was much less” What they “told the public” was ACCURATE AT THE TIME OF THE EUA https://t.co/N3cHYeQmF7 https://t.co/T5UO1cEU6v
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @ParentMishmash: Context matters, the vaccines are more effective against lower viral loads encountered when there is widespread mask we…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @ParentMishmash: Context matters, the vaccines are more effective against lower viral loads encountered when there is widespread mask we…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
RT @ParentMishmash: Context matters, the vaccines are more effective against lower viral loads encountered when there is widespread mask we…
Context matters, the vaccines are more effective against lower viral loads encountered when there is widespread mask wearing and known sick individuals isolated for 14 days
RT @deonandan: 2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan vari…
2020: COVID mRNA vaccines shown in RCTs to be ~95% effective in preventing symptomatic disease caused by original Wuhan variant. https://t.co/FUgBoSCxo4 [3/17]
@PourlAmourdeDi2 @maxigauch @Xochipelli1953 @clarisselecter1 C'est pas un mystère ceci, l'absence de donnée sur la transmission été déjà dis dans la publications originale de Pfizer. https://t.co/Qtuh3EqmWd
@Ferhatarslandr Biri Hacettepe mi dedi? https://t.co/DQ0ZuKk3Ju @avcemilcicek06
@RickHol7 @goodfoodgal It was not experimental, having passes pre-clinical, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III clincal trials in over 4,000 people, showing an excellent safety profile. https://t.co/M3Q0VM9ecE
@WanderLight2020 @GarethPetterwo1 Critically review this paper then you pair of experts.. https://t.co/r5BxVumK12).
@JWV21369 @goodfoodgal Again.
@cathy_sapp @DiedSuddenly_ Published Dec 2020 https://t.co/RDOqFukM0G
@willPS21 @realAdamPilat @P_McCulloughMD @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @ShannonJoyRadio @SaraGonzalesTX @JoeTalkShow @VigilantNews @Jo_Bond @DrNoMask @red_pill_health @IronWillRpt @stinchfield1776 @JonathanOtto17 Huh? Honey, what other primary endpoint do you
@JWV21369 @goodfoodgal It was not experimental https://t.co/YMj1nCfWz0
@AwakeCaptain @goodfoodgal It was not untested , it underwent preclinical, Phase I, Phase Ii and Phase III clinical trials before the rollout. And it's not dangerous. https://t.co/YMj1nCfWz0
>(3)高い発症防止効果があるのに >感染予防効果なく >大量の無症状感染者発生させ >感染爆発引き起こした疑い ファイザーのワクチンの従来株に対する治験で高い効果が確認されましたが、その効果は実は発症者の感染確認で発症防止効果で感染予防効果ではありません。→ https://t.co/mfnfQcoOPo
@Lazergoblets @yay_its_james 95% reduction in Risk of symptomatic Covid is what should have been said as that is what the evidence shows. Pretty darn good. https://t.co/yaErjt4nf3
一つ忘れた。 [ 私が注射式の新型コロナワクチンに反対する理由 ] (4)mRNAワクチン等の核酸ワクチン全体が危険というよりファイザー社が二つのmRNAワクチン候補の選定でスパイク蛋白の「根」までコピーし人間の細胞の表面に突出したままになる候補を選んだ。他社もマネ。 https://t.co/1mAPadFAdn
@Lazergoblets @jendhana @yay_its_james Doesn’t matter what “they” said. The data didn’t show “you are guaranteed wouldn’t get Covid.” You expect a guarantee but 95% reduction in symptomatic COVID is still pretty good. https://t.co/yaErjt4nf3
@TuliHamilton70 @culann_h @lovintexas2 Notice how you are using anecdotes that appeal to emotion while I cite actual data. https://t.co/6bIA1YLT1E
@Olivia_L_123 @beats_unlimited @focusonline Hier: https://t.co/WgvBS0hHoc Doppelblindstudie zu maßnahmen? Du meinst wenn man in ein Restaurant geht und weder besucher noch arzt wissen ob es offen ist. 😂 meine güte… Oder eine maske trägt aber nicht weiß ob
@mothrfunkr @Brettheepi This might be the study. If anyone wants to review. https://t.co/HamBCKHXtZ
@Demons_whisper @s0ftqbEJBEzhK2S 厚労省が信頼出来ないにせよ大元の治験結果や別の組織が効果を保証しております。┐(´д`)┌ https://t.co/9LjF7MuJc3 https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR
@Taste_Swansea @Rhianna_1989 @DocAhmadMalik Here’s the Phase 3 clinical trial of the BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine. https://t.co/safdrHVodS
@hkakeya これ読め定期。 https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR https://t.co/jY943RlNMW あとワクチンが安全でないならこんな結果は出ない。 https://t.co/9LjF7MuJc3
@s0ftqbEJBEzhK2S 一応コロワクもポンコツじゃないぞ。 製造に時間がかかるわ培養中に変異するわする従来型と違って配列さえわかれば工場で作れる利点がある。 https://t.co/HiAvsY1YZR https://t.co/jY943RlNMW
@Franck20270 @HerbelPhilippe N'importe quoi...https://t.co/8EznWSNcsJ
@InfoJunkieKG @kelly_is_jelly @RameseSanders Look at that, Pfizer vaccine vs saline placebo. That took 10 seconds. Please explain how you could miss this if you’re as informed as you think you are ? Did you even look this up or just believe RFK and keep mo
@GlennyDrag44377 Ok you made a claim. Demonstrate how they are not safe & effective by providing a critical evaluation of the following. Include a discussion on method robustness and statistical power of the data. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@monkey449 @chrisms150 @RadCentrism Again title and journal clearly visible, but I’ll do it for you. https://t.co/eiSwCmjQ0t
@edoardoNA @Yosemitebaffo @byoblu Quindi un avvocato ti spiega medicina? La sperimentazione è stata fatta PRIMA dell'immissione in commercio... https://t.co/i8VwSc4bH6
@LCForgeron @IanCopeland5 @RobertfKennedJr What you talking about then, fuck nuts? Covid vaccines that were tested against a saline placebo? 😀 https://t.co/LPXszEVrmV https://t.co/dXsbf9nYOG
@FnqSilver @TrueBlue_76 @Kevin_McKernan These are the initial trials. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@FnqSilver @TrueBlue_76 @Kevin_McKernan WTF is wrong with you? Really. Here are the phase III trials that led to the release of the vaccine. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@JosephAFetz @Kevin_McKernan Dumbass: it has already been done over and over again. Ask your cult to free you. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@robbi_fahey It did. Can you point to what was missing? Go ahead and comment on the experimental design & robustness of the methodology. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@Chris34259480 @Debunk_the_Funk No, they literally did not. That's completely false. And only a few lunatic grifters believe they are unsafe. Vaccines are tested extensively. Let me put your mind at ease. Now you will understand! MMR & Covid. READ: h
@KirMt5491 @doctorofinfo @WokeVirtueSignl @skepticalraptor Vaccine clinical trials don’t test for transmission Pfizer P3, Dec 2020 https://t.co/LPXszEVrmV https://t.co/Byko3reS4X
@CircleBackG1rl @NJWarriorgirl @InformedNJNurse Ok great, you’ve made a claim, let’s discuss it. What is your critical evaluation of the following? Please be specific. https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@GarrettHR825
@ElbioGarcia5 @Subrayado a qué te referís con pinchazos experimentales? La vacuna BNT162b2 pasó x todas las fases q tiene q pasar una vacuna.Y tenés q demostrar q las vacunas provocaron 15 mil muertos. Hasta ahora no hay ninguna evidencia científica de eso
@Jimm513 @kevinnbass Incorrect: how did you miss all of the double blind studies that WERE done? "The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups" https://t.co/pVSYBgz2ho.
@Theo16827582 @BusyDrT @Jimm513 @kevinnbass Incorrect: how did you miss all of the double blind studies that WERE done? "The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups" https://t.co/pVSYBgz2ho.
@BusyDrT @Jimm513 @kevinnbass I'm sorry how did you miss all of the double blind studies that WERE done? "The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups" https://t.co/pVSYBgz2ho.
【参考文献】 (上のツイートの添付画像の数字に対応) [1]https://t.co/sHHoM1mqVB [2]https://t.co/cBqWrGVq1z [3]https://t.co/n3xhM9EOyy [4]https://t.co/Gkj8j78zHk [5]https://t.co/vRTrSHM5Bo [6]https://t.co/NME37Oz5vb [7]https://t.co/JC17EW6LG2 [8]https://t.co/TwKE7jKALO
@malteingver https://t.co/GdZPA1jrZr https://t.co/OmKcVf8tTg Hier zwei Links deren Informationen sich absolut nicht mit deinen Aussagen decken... Haben die dann Unrecht?
@timothy_millar @SwaledaleMutton If you insist https://t.co/8isl6dZxsc
@SkepticalMutant @dubiousvictory @FiveTimesAugust Do you believe claims of safety/reliability made in brochures or TV commercials? The highest impact 'studies' supporting claims of CoV jab benefits were prepared mostly by stockholders and employees of Pfz.
@conascent @_everythingism @gcochran99 @ban_epp_gofroc @past_is_future @gtuckerkellogg @jocelynkaiser Why am I not surprised? 🤦♂️ https://t.co/yA88N7OMOU https://t.co/EFAKTVTix0
@microBIOblog Para más inri los resultados finales publicados por la propia PFIZER, declaran la Eficacia real no del 95% sino del -30% , sí, MENOS 30%. Y eso incluso sin haber testado seguridad ni eficacia Ojo, dicho POR ELLOS MISMOS. https://t.co/djljhM5
De linken zijn op een of andere manier gebroken. Hier nogmaals: https://t.co/OIGI8vCxmz https://t.co/0RgGIIYxzc https://t.co/7w8rsqAzAl
@coreisma @dr_jon_l @jennabgreen @Doctor_Eric_B @gorskon @CaulfieldTim @medicamentarii @MakisMD @DrCanuckMD @DrJacobsRad @19joho @DrEricDing Come back when you've learned that basics of evaluating medical research, non-expert vaccine denialist, instead of
RT @christianperez: El 10 de diciembre de 2020 se publicó en 'The New England Journal of Medicine' la información relativa a su seguridad y…
RT @christianperez: El 10 de diciembre de 2020 se publicó en 'The New England Journal of Medicine' la información relativa a su seguridad y…