@TwistedTrvster @feistykind @Captaincoby00 There were peer reviewed studies required before the vaccines were approved. https://t.co/ygyT08zrGY https://t.co/OT4uR3vCUV
@cantstopmenowww Here's the clinical trial data that I sourced my data from: https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo "No deaths were considered by the investigators to be related to the vaccine or placebo. No Covid-19–associated deaths were observed." https://t.co/ZGpGl
@GilliRoth @shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Some got it wrong for sure. Best to rely on peer reviewed papers that document that vaccinated people got infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, as in the clinica
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Mostly, you are misunderstanding what was said, but in some cases, some did get it wrong. Best to rely on published papers on the topic. Again: https://t.c
@shanbwdn @nz_factivist You seem to be denying the existence of the clinical trials. "Never" is a big claim. "BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19". You have been misled. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk No. That is a lie. From Dec 2020: "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT
@shanbwdn @GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk And here you are, exposing yourself as gullible by saying all sorts of nonsense. In the clinical trials in Dec 2020 by documenting 8 people who were vaccinat
@shanbwdn @nz_factivist 95% efficacy is not "useless". You have been misled. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @GilliRoth @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Do you think 95% efficacy is the same as 100%? Really? Hint: they are different numbers. https://t.co/Ca2VA5jPKo
@GilliRoth @AutixTheCore @shanbwdn @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk Anyone who said that the vaccines prevented all transmission was mistaken. "There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose a
@shanbwdn @AutixTheCore @GilliRoth @LongCovidFam @RandPaul @RWMaloneMD @RobertKennedyJr @elonmusk The objective of the mRNA Covid vaccines was to reduce serious illness and death. The clinical trials and subsequent measured the efficacy of that, not transm
@AussieFedUp Um. A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 (30 μg per dose, given 21 days apart) was found to be safe and 95% effective against Covid-19. And follow up studies show similar results. https://t.co/osLsvyWgG1(30%20%CE%BCg%20per%20dose,vaccine%20effic
@P_McCulloughMD @TexasLindsay_ @VigilantFox @twc_health @MakisMD @FLSurgeonGen @drcraigwax @DrNoMask But there were RCTs... https://t.co/WHuihAtFyQ
@BGatesIsaPyscho All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
@Fenbeagle @accountingetc All vaccines completed phase 3 human trials in 2020. Here is the Pfizer trial. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@accountingetc The vaccines are very safe and very effective. Why is a random accountant promoting medical conspiracy theorie from three years ago? https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@aaaabbb03268022 臨床試験の当初の試験デザインの内の最初の短期間の部分で何らかの指標について(不正等の有無はここでは無視するとして)一定の成績をとって短期的有効性と短期的安全性が確認されて(本当に?)、なぜか建前上で最善の介入行為であると看做されて、・・・ https://t.co/7jF4ughmuy
@USMortality @IanCopeland5 Are you seriously that deluded? The first two - with >75,000 people before the vaccine was even released are below. There are dozens more. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@TheCIVICSc @JohntheLyricist "Only 15% got 4 plus." You are so hopelessly lost that you are mixing up DNA and pineapples The first two studies are below. Try not avoid saying even stupider things. https://t.co/S2miJhF8pW https://t.co/nfTGNP60aY
@CitizenXjf60682 @stopvaccinating Seems like you haven't actually looked into the matter at all, have you? Super easy to find. 14,000 citation. Pretty well know. https://t.co/3xOw4k34BR
@ThomasManson420 @era1521 @RMarsh991 @Simon106229076 @JohntheLyricist @HeidiPa22668162 95% protection is the best protection from any vaccine ever. https://t.co/MwrEQZDcrK
@MemeDealin @jneill "Efficacy was based on reduced mortality after 21 days." No it wasn't. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@FQu3ncy13485 @paulwooods Ah, I follow you now. How am I not OK; how do you know? You’re not my doctor and I certainly haven’t been to you for a check up. As to the rest of your statement, perhaps you would like to tell me what you find wrong with this st
@Stoke170 @DrSusanOliver1 The efficacy was known. Read this. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@STRAT777 Can you send me the paper with the 75% increase? I didn’t see it in this paper https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@DrBillyBay Novovax https://t.co/3W7Oe8YI1E
@bentannedetout @CafeGratiss @habsrulez https://t.co/8zuTgmAlWr Non ce n’était pas expérimental
@STRAT777 Can you show me where that definition is? Here is the paper. https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
Safe and effective, Zeker weten https://t.co/gvqMfjZLfU
@xNikiStone @KuikenAndrew Dummy: there were two randomized placebo controlled trials of >75,000 people before the virus was even released. And dozens more since of >3 million people. The first two are below. https://t.co/S2miJhF8pW https://t.co/nf
@unhealthytruth @vancemurphy Since you want peer-reviewed studies, take a moment to read this one: https://t.co/H0jNoJGpyc
@JimiHendrixHata @Kuroi_Yahu @studiocorvo 緊急承認は米国ですね 日本では緊急承認はしてません https://t.co/9sCwCVEj5f 国際Ⅲ相試験については、こちらを見ればわかります 他に知りたいことはありますか?
@bibinhafc @PlesseSbastien1 @Philipp57213303 La pub de Loannidis est plus que d'actualités avec toutes les dérives observer pendant le covid. Pfizer qui a fait des milliards avec son Vax et le résultat d'efficacité très problématique sans compter les reche
@perdulenore @FiveTimesAugust @CDCgov You misunderstood my point. Medical research trials require a large number of participants. The initial Covid vax trials enrolled 43,500 people. Not one person, more than 43,500. This allows for credible results and e
@VPrasadMDMPH All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, good
全然凄くない件w
@Kevjoseph6 @cellestial1 @DrNice2022 Oh and for two, here’s the sources both for the trial and the authorization. https://t.co/CS5PRhQAzi https://t.co/nllMjSWhu1 https://t.co/sDw88ayUfG
@Adam_Penning @ranttilwecant @tulloch1978 Here's the phase III Pfizer trial, you can find the others yourself. https://t.co/MwrEQZCECc
@HuntersBackpack @mcfunny @Joeblow19995676 @mrscorer @Moai214527262 @TakethatCt @LJBarre @DavidAKirkwood @Chatty_si @judysimpson222 @SwaledaleMutton @JiminyC24 @booyakashan1 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human cli
RT @NiusMarco: Lien https://t.co/NP7XYWhN9B et Rapport final https://t.co/6fKdadCrb1 8ieme fichier page 132 (en Vert ce sont les gens du gr…
@beachhawk874 @VeritasEver @minagelina1 @2Swerdy It was published.... https://t.co/Zp9ffUi9bg https://t.co/bqjJa4cCzU
@l47483 @Rnneholmsparke1 @Smiglurt @GripJesper @axbelund @50MFB Om du kollar här så ser du att man visst använt placebo i tidigt Covid vaccin.. Dessutom så framkom det att man gjorde det i en stor studie (de Rönneholmsparkens länk) om poliovaccin. Tyvärr
@era1521 @glenpyle WTF are you talking about? These are the original phase III trials conducted before the vaccine was released. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@Spanishape29 @world_of_pies @MarkAllsworth2 @diego_hawk90544 @ABridgen @PennyMordaunt Mate, I've posted loads, I can keep going if you want, there's countless studies on this, let me know if you want more https://t.co/ICPejsQTZd
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@FeldsparElodie @ClareCraigPath @MarkWLaw66 Not true. Many had comorbities and many were older than 65. Consult tables S2 and S4 in https://t.co/tw8UZCe5LT. But you are right about pregnancies in the first trials. Which is also clearly stated in the paper
@JamesDitto12 @BradJamin3 It was published in Dec 2020 https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@MyNoseBegins @BarryESharp @sjs856 No, I don't. Because it is reality. It has nothing to do with me. Here are the first two trials BEFORE release. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@notabotautobot @DrNeilStone Sorry - I cannot act on the delusional fantasies of social media posters. Read one of the studies. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu
@notabotautobot @DrNeilStone Why don't you try to read just one of the many actual studies? https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu
@Protagonisthell @The_Seeadler @CodingFiend @stkirsch Where - on this planet - do you find this insane nonsense? There are NO "randomised number of placebos and live vaccines". This is akin to interviewing a schizophrenic patient during acute psychosis.
@STRAT777 Here’s the link again. https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
@STRAT777 Here it is 😀. Highlight and screen shot 😀. https://t.co/eJhohS5PsV
RT @NiusMarco: Lien https://t.co/NP7XYWhN9B et Rapport final https://t.co/6fKdadCrb1 8ieme fichier page 132 (en Vert ce sont les gens du gr…
@message2garcia Since you appear to struggle with finding a paper, here’s mine: https://t.co/nE2KyTXKDF Ready to discuss?
@TruthHurts2160 @JohannesBlackh1 @FormerAntivax @stkirsch Here you go Note the date The information was published and available before the vaccine roll out. If you chose not to read it that's up to you https://t.co/n4Mx2bPPMD
@Mylittlepretti @JohntheLyricist @FiveTimesAugust This vaccine was randomised and double blinded against saline placebo https://t.co/tk3YFa2gr6
@era1521 @sharkzfanz @Fornowago There rather obviously WAS a study. Not sure what you’re getting at. https://t.co/uPVqH9KMqe
@era1521 @sharkzfanz @Fornowago Gosh it sure seems like they did a study. Also, placebo is used to show efficacy. Phase I trials are for safety. https://t.co/uPVqH9KMqe
@dubba611 @getstoseven @SenRonJohnson @RobertKennedyJr Here is the Pfizer safety study you seem too lazy to google: https://t.co/TscrydjTx5
@RB84509962 @MauritzPreller @jsm2334 @sco0psmcgoo @MonthlySandwich @dr_jon_l @LowCard_Hunger @BarryYoungNZ Here is one of the trials. https://t.co/aLTzWbuamt
@Silver_Lining76 @BerryTartlet @sjs856 December 2020 https://t.co/tD1STINAHX Please provide a peer reviewed study which concludes the vaccines are NOT safe & effective. Study must be large N and include toxicology and genetic studies. If you do f a
@AudioAdvent @zap_lock @pureblazejp Here is a slice of salami. The original Pfizer trials. https://t.co/TwixPx2xED
@GolfElkLife @jimeekay @The_JAY_N_G @DrSusanOliver1 It is mathematically proven to do exactly that. Keep posting irrelevant nonsense - it corresponds with you thought process. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@IsDatEchtZo5 @dancalegria @mkeulemans Jij kunt niet zoeken ? Sukkel. Dat duurt 2 seconden. Pfff …. Ik zal nog maar eens mijn goede wil tonen … 👇 https://t.co/5eXFhbcvGj
@GolfElkLife @jimeekay @The_JAY_N_G @DrSusanOliver1 The education system has totally failed you. Demand refund. https://t.co/S2miJhFGfu https://t.co/nfTGNP6y0w
@shouldbenewsap @VeteranGaming75 @goddeketal The same source @goddeketal is referring to! #antivaxxers will gobble up anything that supports their narrative but dismiss the same source that doesn't. Pfizer released the Phase 3 Trial data, which you'll dis
@KatharinaL001 @veit_markus @gigabente @maithi_nk @maithinkx Die sieht irgendwie auch anders aus https://t.co/KRW2pxoDvk
@CazadorSzarrrrr Here’s the “no data” for Covid vaccines. 🙄 https://t.co/YoxKwRXmFF
@weaponizedwheat I can provide you the one thing you will never be able to do. https://t.co/9VYrTdhIiU
@weaponizedwheat all day long https://t.co/9VYrTdhIiU
@stkirsch Yes, there are counterexamples. Read it and weep. You're proven wrong again. https://t.co/LFghi9sFU8
@Brainsurfing22 @nycfreethinker @DrPaulOffit We are talking about one that was tested in one of the largest RCTs ever run and was against a saline placebo. So you’re in favor of the Covid vaccines as they meet this criteria. https://t.co/FJJJaMMTru https:/
@BenSmit81581660 All of the approved COVID vaccines have been through Phase I, II and III human clinical trails. Pfizer Phase III clinical trial data were published in Dec 2020, 95% efficacy against original covid compared to placebo vaccinated controls, g
RT @lonnibesancon: @docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0…
RT @lonnibesancon: @docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0…
@docdu16 Je suppose que la traduction de "safe and effective" n'est pas sur et efficace alors? https://t.co/4G20Nm2GG0 https://t.co/fGRXaVxWfM https://t.co/cqn00DJAjj J'écris de ce pas au New England et à BMJ qui visiblement ne savent pas de quoi ils par
@KirMt5491 @WokeVirtueSignl @doctorofinfo @skepticalraptor Gates was on about “key goals” in 2020 Vaccine trials don’t test for transmission. Antivaxxers can’t read December 2020⬇️ https://t.co/IPkpHn8Eub https://t.co/5NFOPVv9Nn