@CaitheD @AlanWil96846129 @AnnadeBuisseret @DrNeilStone @BBCNews There are a number of different trials for different vaccines, but all that have been approved for use have reported their results. Pfizer and Moderna's results were published publicly in Dec
@recnstructedPIE @mumzles1 @FullFact He is correct, more people died in the vacc arm than the placebo arm, and cardiac deaths were 80% higher. The summary report: https://t.co/9JEQOTLs1Q The appendix with data tables: https://t.co/OE1zObNq8X This is the
@Treauge1 I read the original trial data that was released and worked out the ARR which was conveniently left out… https://t.co/BNrXGQk0kD
@MntnBusDriver @Tessakayswc @codeaiwi @DiamondandSilk Cool. Would a full double blind, randomized, placebo controlled peer reviewed clinical trial the most respected medical journal in the world meet your standards? It doesn’t say things that you want to
@VonMaunder @FionnMacCool @TrollAdopt @PlainJaneDoe17 @Puppieskitts @HeyNurseKat @jason_willz1 @rt7683 @P_McCulloughMD Tell me why these phase 3 studies, completed before the vaccines were approved, were insufficient. Tell me what these studies lacked. W
@johnrich You lie. Once again. And fools believe you. Here are the results of the clinical trials. 43,538 participants in a double blind placebo study. New England Journal of Medicine. https://t.co/mx9TWtTJt9
@Tjara2706 @Ella_von_T @lexienny @eduardt_s @Andreasvhuber Weitere Impfstoff-Studien mit Teilnehmer Ü65. https://t.co/ylR0PUI6A3 https://t.co/TpLKhkQTAl https://t.co/gYMwUV6YWH https://t.co/iOWPjQRsBA
@Anthony_Mazzola @thegodmachinist @BadVaccineTakes @BBCNews @DrAseemMalhotra Could you please provide your critical evaluation of this publication? You say you do your own research, so I’d be interested to see where your criticisms lie - are they more meth
@RabbleRouseED @DrJenGunter @gmcuk I wasn't listening too closely, but I think he referred to evidence from the phase 3 trials. Perhaps we read different reports, but I wonder why he isn't warning about placebo given the results. Pfizer https://t.co/gudX
@MonicaTurk1 @DrJamesOlsson What do you mean, "never had a safety trial"? A quick search turns up loads. As for the rest of your tweet, it's unscientific tosh. https://t.co/twPgiP6t3R https://t.co/epWSx21fbV
RT @re_alCapone: @TexasLindsay_ @IamBrookJackson @thackerpd According to the study: 36,523 participants 18,198 with vaccine → 8 positive c…
@Jclearfield2 @DaleEnright2 @justin_hart I'll explain the difference for you seeing as you're obviously incapable of explaining this yourself. I'll refer to this trial: https://t.co/33NCJgOIYe
@Tidiane84101146 @jjohana P.s: lisez les résultats des essais publiés en décembre 2020 et regardez vous-même s'il n y a pas de groupe placebo 👇 https://t.co/ndtbiGtoaM
@Blackwolf1166 @Adrian_DeMarco @hodgetwins Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested the vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found it works with 95% efficacy against symptomatic illness and published the results in the New England J
@nathaliejacoby1 Here is good evidence, although not an easy read. https://t.co/8IQUfw81OD
RT @KyleMcnease: Pfizer in their own words: “The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and…
Pfizer in their own words: “The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety.”
People in public health debating me haven’t read the studies. Here’s the Pfizer study from 12/2020. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine” BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). https:
@pokrath นี่คือ endpoint ของ phase3 clinical trial ไม่เห็นมีลดความรุ่นแรงของโรคครับ https://t.co/tfyfee7z5s https://t.co/bWSM0wRfIc
@Michael99715644 @MAGAmom_inMI @KA_Todd19 @Project_Veritas @pfizer You are either severely misinformed, or lying. https://t.co/m2tAIG401W Right here is their full data set for phase 3 of their clinical trials published in 2020.
@MAGAmom_inMI @KA_Todd19 @Project_Veritas @pfizer And then did a full 3 phase clinical in 2020 ending in December even before it was approved for EUA. https://t.co/m2tAIG401W All data right there for free.
@jawholesalers @Tessakayswc @codeaiwi @DiamondandSilk You have to be joking. Please tell me you are joking. LITERALLY publicly available for over a year in the most famous medical journal on the planet. https://t.co/OpexaXNi1s
@JLSolatges @Space_Marcel @astynis @Exactweet Dtc ça aurait été vulgaire. https://t.co/OClC6yCxaV
@tokenfox1 @MarioNawfal I am referring predominantly to the study below and then supplemental data released following the @ICANdecide lawsuit, represented by @AaronSiriSG defeating attempts by Pfizer to keep that data private for 75 years. 1/ https://t.c
@neilstweet @jtaglejr @chadhawley21 @NowTheEndBegins JFC you lazy POS. Here you go. https://t.co/Sxo2Mka9YU
@Rich_Cooper You cut him off. The vaccine was highly effective against the wt virus and that’s what the 50,000 person study showed which caused the FDA to approve the vaccine. https://t.co/CzpJIx7kOF
RT @re_alCapone: @TexasLindsay_ @IamBrookJackson @thackerpd According to the study: 36,523 participants 18,198 with vaccine → 8 positive c…
@kaylynnx6 @terrymr @JoshLammle @elonmusk @slashdot Sure dude, tell us what is this then. Phase 1/2 (August 2020): https://t.co/KsNYbHYz6x Phase 2/3 (December 2020, also the largest Phase 3 trial): https://t.co/UcvNWTlqVi
@leavemealone049 @BriannaWu @elonmusk What do you think clinical trials supposed to do? https://t.co/g9MkdEHdYk
@VerbiskJ @DoctorLunge @barryjohnreid21 @jneill @BreezerGalway @JudithLomax1 @SerTophamHatt @basil_ireton @kgreene90 @jason_willz1 @dasha_dagmar https://t.co/lZezceRTFr https://t.co/00r6x70AYm asinine claim. also didn’t I send you a link before talking a
@Mikey_Hars @rachelschraer @DrAseemMalhotra Its here for Pfizer: https://t.co/R3F0ePuw0x Though I note you're well aware of this study. Here for Moderna: https://t.co/dBJxq5Gr3T And for detailed safety data there are loads of observational studies like thi
@Jacques3Riv Une autre affaire que tu sais pas comment sa fonctionne Phase 1 phase 2 phase 3 Phase 4 pharmacovigilance Les données de phase 3 sont disponible depuis 31 décembre 2020 https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij Mais continue a suivre les participants pen
@WitchDrTim @Mary86802059 @catturd2 It's right here: https://t.co/mNxYOHzdmN
@AmyTaylorTx @kiley_christina 2/ lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 >>>
@James74842954 @BertaCBaby @scchumpert @BradSinger14 @_richardalbury @RX_forLiberty No, the citation I already gave you was from 12/2020. Try again. https://t.co/HbMkoaOoNG
@James74842954 @BertaCBaby @scchumpert @BradSinger14 @_richardalbury @RX_forLiberty The data is published. 🤦 https://t.co/HbMkoaNQY8
@JamieSale Here's the scientific study: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@MEUNIERPatric11 @Erik44187887 @VieDeCarabin Résultat de la phase 3. Et c'est pas "dans la presse". On s'en fout de la presse. C'est dans la littérature scientifique. https://t.co/RweHAguJKA
@bydVisibleLight @orthodago have you looked at the study itself? or going by a rumble video? Ou and the study is from dec.2020. https://t.co/ISEpczkF68
@LuvFotos @JamieSale Here's the trials. Let me know what part of "8 cases of Covid-19 were observed among vaccine recipients and 162 among placebo recipients" you're having trouble understanding. https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@pidroupidrou @JeremyFOUBERT1 @AntoinetteColby @Guillaume_HB Pour les 95% d’efficacité, c’est ici : https://t.co/sUk5YCUFQe Pourquoi dis-tu qu’on les attend ?
New England Journal of Medicine
@DarrellWelch16 @AGJeffLandry @WhiteHouse @facebook @TuckerCarlson Hahaha hold on I have to stop laughing at you before I can respond. Ok you want to talk about science? Why don’t you go ahead and tell me exactly what your issues are with the following.
@VerbiskJ @JDCBurnhil @TakethatCt @BreezerGalway @basil_ireton @kgreene90 @jason_willz1 @dasha_dagmar nope. you are incredibly misinformed. https://t.co/00r6x70AYm https://t.co/lZezceRTFr
@BlackTomThePyr8 @catturd2 Let's check reality: https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@dminfa72 @sensepassking @Project_Veritas @pfizer https://t.co/m2tAIG401W What is this then?
@GPF4GOBLUE4 @allthatyazzz @Project_Veritas @pfizer Please show me where there was zero long term testing (and what that even means) and explain to me in great detail what Pfizer published through the New England journal of medicine seen here: https://t.co
@InVino69 @bosn_rule @RWMaloneMD This is the result of Pfizer’s phase one and phase 2 clinical trials. It was published Dec 31, 2020. It has been available since before then in preprint. Get it together and read things. Stop believing your propaganda sourc
RT @SoothSpider: @profnfenton @TheLancet The world: What's the ARR for the Pfizer vaccines? @TheLancet, sorry, the RRR is the best we can…
RT @SoothSpider: @profnfenton @TheLancet The world: What's the ARR for the Pfizer vaccines? @TheLancet, sorry, the RRR is the best we can…
@SteveGr65178586 @thatsnotmine125 Apart from the fact that there were tens of thousands participating in the phase 3 clinical trials, it was the rapid decoupling of deaths from cases. Besides which, I had AZ x 2 and Moderna as a booster. https://t.co/cgo
@LeoneRechDaldos - Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine, https://t.co/Z16EqFc1Jn (un articolo scientifico, non la vostra aria fritta) - Comirnaty (BNT162b2), il primo vaccino contro il COVID-19 approvato in Europa e in Italia, https://
RT @SoothSpider: @profnfenton @TheLancet The world: What's the ARR for the Pfizer vaccines? @TheLancet, sorry, the RRR is the best we can…
RT @AndiDog87: The original trial https://t.co/8PYu7DHnz7 cleary shows the data in figures and tables: 8 cases in 18198 vaccinated vs. 162…
RT @SenseurFR: 💉parmi la population testée: • 35 % étaient obèses • 35 % étaient en surpoids • 42 % avaient plus de 55 ans 🇫🇷 parmi la pop…
@Jfleming7777 @TigerlillySusan @Foot_House_ @AlexBerenson You don't seem to know what "chemokines" are, nor the role they play in normal cell migration. Random unsourced claims you hear on Twitter regarding chemokines you don't understand, doesn't trump c
RT @SoothSpider: How did #Pfizer arrive at 95% efficacy? What were they testing for exactly? Placebo arm: 162 +ve PCR tests / 21,728 = 0.7…
@alphonse_braun Il est pas abonné https://t.co/5oEJiKFg0c
RT @SoothSpider: @profnfenton @TheLancet The world: What's the ARR for the Pfizer vaccines? @TheLancet, sorry, the RRR is the best we can…
@profnfenton @TheLancet The world: What's the ARR for the Pfizer vaccines? @TheLancet, sorry, the RRR is the best we can do. https://t.co/TvcxFpKxkQ
@Rikkoroo @k_b_lvi @thisisnothappen @carlsmythe @tenebra99 @MelissaaLee13 @Doctor_Eric_B these animals did not die of 'rapid onset cancer.' https://t.co/zXpsYh4Kbf
@jeremyknauff @latimes you’re refuting yourself. Read your own chart you included. 91.3% is not 100%. Read the trial results from the publication https://t.co/BqEj7RevG3
@Hypothesis @Dadesway @kluge_camille @DrAseemMalhotra The single study that you love to share as proof of vaccine efficacy is funded by the company selling the drug. No self-respecting doctor would over look that fact either. https://t.co/1li7ZjlkVS htt
@oppys_ipad @CaulfieldTim @Nature @DrJenGunter @ScienceUpFirst @crackedscience @jonathanstea @RealTalkRJ @shazmamithani @DocMCohen @carlyweeks A ridiculous and absurd lie, easily disproved by looking at the results of the study published in a peer-reviewed
@Justhstop @DrAseemMalhotra Like this one you mean? Why haven’t you been able to find this? How odd. https://t.co/c5tgvC1GFF
@AnnaMarie01136 @DrAseemMalhotra That is not evidence. That is an interview. That is lazy “research” This is actual evidence. https://t.co/y69ZPV8G8P
@The_game_is_up @PatrickBaffl92 @MyLeft2009 @DonaldJTrumpJr Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested the vaccine in a massive clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% efficacy against symptomatic infection, and published the results in the NEJM on
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@carolina_bonita @BobLeithiserPhD ARR vs RRR!! 👍👍👍
@LRP196111 @ChristianM_28 Wrong. Man, the 'do your own research' crowd sure is bad at doing research. This is just one of several trials. "A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 an
RT @DrJBhattacharya: This clip is infuriating. It is an admission of public health malpractice by the @CDCDirector. The main clinical en…
@jarb0h @yannispappas Wrong Again: https://t.co/kHyskXnkbZ
@FreedomBro1 @ScottAdamsSays But unlike WMDs, for Pfizervax there was a published, prospective randomized blinded trial with significant results https://t.co/BqEj7RevG3
@ShinyRhiny @JessicaVaugn @ScottAdamsSays Everybody’s entitled to their own intuitions but not to their own Randomized, prospective trials… https://t.co/BqEj7Rf3vB
@amuse @ScottAdamsSays The did test for efficacy and published it in December 2020. Here are the results: https://t.co/BqEj7RevG3
@ScottAdamsSays @AdamsDarrellj Yes, I took the Pfizervax within weeks of the trial results being published. It seemed like a miracle of modern medical science & still does. Since then, serious complications caused by it are found to be rare. https://t
@akheriaty @TuckerCarlson Meanwhile, Pfizer CLEARLY SHOWS the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual getting symptoms or severe disease Yet gov / "experts" aroun
@JjinUk64 @Shannon_10Ten @DrAseemMalhotra What trial is this? This is an excerpt from the original Pfizer worldwide mRNA trial, the one that got it emergency authorisation across the world. There were more deaths (4) in the placebo arm than in the vaccine
@broadmoorloon @ThisAndThat71 @DiedSuddenly_ Here is the original trial data the vaccine was released on the strength of, notice the date of mine.. https://t.co/yIwn5jVcLC
@broadmoorloon @ThisAndThat71 @DiedSuddenly_ Uk website here, but it’s the same. This was the information it was released on the strength of… https://t.co/yIwn5jUEW4
RT @SoothSpider: How did #Pfizer arrive at 95% efficacy? What were they testing for exactly? Placebo arm: 162 +ve PCR tests / 21,728 = 0.7…
@BK63805720 Ti dimostro ulteriormente quanto sei manipolabile perché non leggi e approfondisci quello che condividi. Pfizer ha reso pubblico il suo studio di fase 3 (ultima tua foto) in data 31 dicembre 2020. Puoi leggerlo qui: https://t.co/8ne76xDRiE
@broadmoorloon @ThisAndThat71 @DiedSuddenly_ Here, if you honestly can’t remember… https://t.co/BNrXGQkyab