@BarrettBoys @Truth_in_Number @kraster @BrianBnew @DrSusanOliver1 Anyway, I was referring to the Pfizer trial: https://t.co/BrzvU4lOha A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,
@MdBreathe @RepThomasMassie @WMBarrettMD The 0.84% absolute risk reduction figure was from the original NEJM paper (Dec 2020). The compliment to the 95% efficacy (efficacy). I really despise it when prevention of rare outcomes are only presented as RRR, no
RT @pedrogabwriter: @MurielBlaivePhD @NGrossman81 My memory is working just fine. That’s why I know that the primary endpoint of the trial…
RT @pedrogabwriter: @MurielBlaivePhD @NGrossman81 My memory is working just fine. That’s why I know that the primary endpoint of the trial…
@KDog0129 @JCF4004 @dr_jon_l Here's the Pfizer report if you're curious. https://t.co/U6SBUfBz0M And here's the material that VRBPAC considered in approving the initial vaccines (many follow-up studies since): https://t.co/NQjIRnbpCV
@QuebecFier @JayPBou https://t.co/mWqbSC0eij Les résultats de la phase 3 après ça ce n’est plus expérimental 😂
@zenoc_oshits @huling_poston The paper clearly shows the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. "preventing COVID-19= preventing SYMPTOMS, not infection. Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual gettin
@DrEliDavid They lied to us all from the beginning The paper CLEARLY SHOWS the trial had ZERO to do w/ infection or transmission. Trial focused on INDIVIDUAL protection / antibody titers to protect from individual getting symptoms or severe disease. https:
@thelastpers0n @DrSusanOliver1 All vaccines are tested. Here is the academic paper on the Comirnaty vaccine from the phase three trial. It showed its efficacy and safety. The data has been available for two years. Since then many data sets on post market s
@ALBandyou @suddensam55 @tomselliott @DrLeanaWen Well that's obviously false. Pfizer tested the vaccine in a huge clinical trial of over 43,000 people, found 95% protection against getting the disease (symptomatic COVID-19), and published the results in th
2.Why is this of any interest?This Israeli article was perhaps even more important than Polack’s earlier article from the Pfizer trial. It showed impressive VE for severe covid disease incl. hospitalizations/deaths. Below is Polack’s Pfizer trial article
@LauraMarleena1 @JaNoHMC @JHermaala Väestötasolla ei ole enää kokeellinen. Faasissa 3 tutkimuksessa yli 40 000 Pfizerilla. Julkaistu vertaisarvioituna ennen väestötason rokotuksia. Mutta kun ei artsusta mitään rokotekriittisissä blogeissa, niin eihän
@Jij99James @CartlandDavid @JohnBri15996997 Well, that's going back a bit now (Dec 2020) and there have been many further RCTs and systematic reviews done in the past 2 years but since you asked, for BNT162b2: https://t.co/4xJtlbB4Um and mRNA-1273: https
RT @subterdude: @AaronSiriSG Six months of safety data? Try 2. https://t.co/KhiAv6zYxF https://t.co/jB23wp3u6k
@MarkBeare4 @HairyHobbit @SoniaPoulton (162+8) / (21,720+21,728)x100 = 0.39% I can't find how long the trial lasted. Here's a link to it btw, this is where I got the figures from: https://t.co/33NCJgOIYe
@laderechadiario https://t.co/QO9V5yMi9e Se sabía desde diciembre de 2020 que Pfizer no apuntaba a la transmisión si no a la letalidad de la enfermedad. Conspiretas baratos, La Terraplanista Diario
RT @subterdude: @AaronSiriSG Six months of safety data? Try 2. https://t.co/KhiAv6zYxF https://t.co/jB23wp3u6k
@Frank_Cipo @PuckLoptr @MarkAll26740409 @Eric13666093 @plneely Yeah they did do RCT's.https://t.co/0qrBf9stLA
@handoferreira @wassdoc @healthbyjames ...also I can't imagine why you say that the "actual trials" were not double blinded and peer reviewed. They were, and were published in NEJM. (Result of Pfizer trials in NEMJ: https://t.co/SNFYoF4Iuq)
RT @subterdude: @AaronSiriSG Six months of safety data? Try 2. https://t.co/KhiAv6zYxF https://t.co/jB23wp3u6k
@unclepaulyn @ForeverCurious8 @PeterHotez Yes read the data. The actual data. Don’t believe some screen cap. Read the section on adverse effects. https://t.co/xWqD4AO7d6.
RT @subterdude: @AaronSiriSG Six months of safety data? Try 2. https://t.co/KhiAv6zYxF https://t.co/jB23wp3u6k
@AaronSiriSG Six months of safety data? Try 2. https://t.co/KhiAv6zYxF https://t.co/jB23wp3u6k
@KanekoaTheGreat @OzraeliAvi @ezralevant At a minimum, he knew on December 31, 2020. That's when their own clinical trial was published that they had not proven to stop infection or transmission, yet he still continues to proclaim its "effectiveness". htt
@Robiq14861284 Siis rokotteita oli toki tutkittu ennen kuin otettiin käyttöön. Esim Pfizerin faasin 3 tulokset julkaistiin vertaisarvioituna joulukuun 2020 alussa. Jos ei linkkiä Kiurun puheeseen, jossa kieltää tutkimisen, niin katson, että katteetonta
@OfWolvesAndWine @kezia_noble Because I can read medical journals, and I did... and made choices based on data https://t.co/jZG46NdXaC
RT @carl_jurassic: Yup Just like the “peer reviewed” Polack et al. 2020 paper in NEJM on the “95% effective” fraudulent Pfizer study was b…
RT @carl_jurassic: Yup Just like the “peer reviewed” Polack et al. 2020 paper in NEJM on the “95% effective” fraudulent Pfizer study was b…
Yup Just like the “peer reviewed” Polack et al. 2020 paper in NEJM on the “95% effective” fraudulent Pfizer study was basically a press release written by Pfizer employees and related associates @jikkyleaks https://t.co/lxBhqhqgb3 COI Disclosure forms h
RT @Lupusreference: 🆕 Check the RESULTS of the randomized #trial of BioNTech-Pfizer's mRNA #COVID19 #vaccine published in the NEJM by Polac…
@Arazel50 What's the ARR I wonder? 🤔
NEJMを読んでいないのはお前だ。馬鹿だな。 お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い。 ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前はバカだから、読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
お前はバカだから、中学英語も理解できない。爆笑 読んでも理解できないので、読もうとしなくて良い。 ワクチンの効果と安全性は確認されている。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
@Ian_Fisch @gotchatrading @hunnybadgermom @EnemyInAState How much did the Pfizer trial show for reduced risk of infection? (162/18325)100 - (8/18198)100 = 0.884% - 0.0440% = 0.84% 0.84% is the difference in the risk of infection btw the groups. https://
RT @KaylorChristian: @Humble_Analysis @ProfKarolSikora The RCT had over 43,000 participants. You can read it here: https://t.co/mR6eWrrWts
@peterdowney17 @DrRanj @RebsTweet @craig_c83 @healthbyjames At the time this video went out, the Pfizer vaccine trial showed an efficacy of 95% against infection from the original strain. By the time the vaccine was rolled out, the virus has evolved into D
RT @lonnibesancon: Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le s…
@ford546_ford @dr_jon_l @DrAseemMalhotra @BBCBreaking 7/ Tell me what these studies lacked. What part of the analysis or methodology do you disagree with? https://t.co/oncK71h3HE https://t.co/C3mgIumwb5 https://t.co/FtULfFnlI1 Let's start here. I want
RT @lonnibesancon: Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le s…
@RedpilledMFT @flyingpinto @JPablee Here is the original paper: https://t.co/DLbuJwB4Bj There are many more that you can easily access by researching "safety and efficacy of mRNA Covid vaccines". As you will see, they all confirm that mRNA vaccines are s
@Humble_Analysis @ProfKarolSikora The RCT had over 43,000 participants. You can read it here: https://t.co/mR6eWrrWts
RT @lonnibesancon: Je vois la sphère habituelle et anti-vaccin se saisir des "aveux de Pfizer"... j'invite ces personne à regarder au plus…
RT @CannConActual: “High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the ab…
@WalkrXY @PopePepeCrypto @LPNational Not true at all. The initial trials suggested that the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine was about 95% effective. At no point did they say NOBODY would get covid. And they absolutely published their results for peer review
RT @lonnibesancon: Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le s…
RT @lonnibesancon: Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le s…
Déjà, rappel, l'étude princeps de Pfizer ne testait pas ça en outcome primaire, et y'a rien de nouveau là dedans on le sait en fait depuis 2020. Il n'y a pas eu de révélation fracassante en fait. Déjà expliqué 10000 fois. Ici 2/n https://t.co/OYsptW8ssl
RT @MIKITO_777: 効果の確認もしていない!? 効果の確認もしていないと、本気で信じているの?? ファイザーは数万人規模の二重盲検RCTという、 極めて厳正な第3相治験を行い、 そこで圧倒的な発症予防効果を確認して承認申請したんですよ? おそらく、世界で最も読…
@IsDatEchtZo5 @PiepzeideM @Immetjes Oh sorry, wil jij linkjes naar klinische studies? Vraag daar dan gewoon naar, dan krijg je die. Pfizer fase 2/3: https://t.co/IrzCqwXQ4R Moderna fase 3: https://t.co/nfSFOC48nz Wil je ook linkjes naar post-marketing
RT @CannConActual: “High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the ab…
ワクチンの安全性と効果は確認されている。https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
ワクチンが原因だという証拠を出せよ! 治験は終了している。 安全性は確認された。 https://t.co/D6M6lwZAkc
RT @CannConActual: “High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the ab…
RT @CannConActual: “High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the ab…
RT @CannConActual: “High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the ab…
“High fructose corn syrup and caramel food coloring is safe for consumption!” Paid for by the Coca-Cola Corp. (the above is satirical) https://t.co/SekyVx2VbB https://t.co/oSRL1Kg40B
@Cvorovici @ZvicerMaja @adzo83 Koje od 50 odobrenih nisu ispitane i 242 u povoju? 1. Sve vakcine https://t.co/cLOnz9ZNQH 2. Pfizer-BioNtech BNT162b2 https://t.co/LSVTXT8WVI 3. Astrazeneca AZD1222 https://t.co/84JUJ9J5NK 4. Astrazeneca https://t.co/p5WUY0j
@EsotericTree @rxpharmgrl @pjackson_nl @TimRunsHisMouth phase 4 began the moment the vaccine was rolled out. That is after the completion of phase 3. Here is the phase 3 publication from Dec 2020 https://t.co/RDOqFuljQe
@Kirchnsteuer @PaulHook_em @LeSoupetarde @catturd2 Who died from the mRNA vaccine during trials exactly? Weird that you would call someone ignorant when you have absolutely no clue what you’re talking about. Eat crow dumb ass. https://t.co/WOPsngwImV
@razor4l @Phillyflipperss @LupeFiasco You can literally look at the vaccine efficacy results of the clinical trials https://t.co/TynfBNArEe
Ist mit dieser Aussage aus der ursprünglichen Pfizer "Studie" aus heutiger Sicht nicht alle weitere Diskussion hinfällig? https://t.co/Wqa1dIuimu https://t.co/fBudCuIXa6
@GrowMorePlants @Drummerdog @irodiotoo @healthbyjames For instance, here's a study of the safety and efficacy of the COVID vaccine: https://t.co/U8465ork9q There were a total of *43,548* participants. Do you need me to show how you that's a large enough
@justagogo @KubeSimon @miamalan @HealthZA No, that's not correct. The phase 3 trial ended in 2020. https://t.co/8H1Zp4rJm7
@mrkungfufighter @catturd2 Err, they had proper clinical trials, with much greater than normal levels of participation - one of the reasons they were completed so fast. https://t.co/tFPXT8M1L2 https://t.co/gfe2EbDhBg https://t.co/Ieejluj0Bn
@fast0eddy @AlBowers1 wrong and wrong. we detected myocarditis from the mRNA vaccines and blood clots from the viral vector vaccines almost 2 years ago now. you realize we’re in January 2023 now right? how long are people gonna spread these lies? https:/
@ZachPopp @stkirsch Here's the study. If you have an issue with it you attend a virology conference where it gets debated and raise your concerns, or publish your own RCT trial results refuting it in a journal. https://t.co/mNxYOHyFxf
@aretieare @Bodtma @DrAseemMalhotra Peer reviewed, first writer is a university professor. You didn't know? https://t.co/R1Z0YCAe3E
@Candace49296143 @Put201V @rycunni https://t.co/n3Gw6qIlcg deaths etc. are in supplementary section. They unblinded the trial after only a couple of months, until unblinding there were 15 deaths in the vaccine group and 14 in the placebo/unvaxxed. 4 cardia
@HalliKjartans @grayish65875604 @AlexBerenson This data has been available since Dec of 2020. When they submitted it to FDA for the emergency use authorisation, it was also published in NEJM. Summary report: https://t.co/9JEQOTKUci Appendix with the tab
@JosephFraiman Proof of the efficiency of these vaccines have been given. Here : https://t.co/Qfhbk79uLA https://t.co/98Mz2ty9JA
@Krom55967042 @JosephFraiman Proofs of efficiency of these vaccines have been given. Here : https://t.co/Qfhbk79uLA https://t.co/98Mz2ty9JA
@JosephFraiman Proof of efficiency of the Pfizer vaccine has been shown, here : https://t.co/Qfhbk79uLA https://t.co/98Mz2ty9JA
@Appleice20 @KanekoaTheGreat I recommend revisiting the clinical trial (https://t.co/ScGutbG93J) as well as what was widely communicated. Two widely different stories were presented.
@nelsonepega No physician expected the following to be ideal in the real world: 95% relative risk reduction compared to the placebo group. https://t.co/HnmgpOvVDL
@nelsonepega This is searchable currently: https://t.co/Qe23tqM9js
@ClanOcid @Dcarroll64D @jawholesalers @FoxNews Have a link? Worst results I see is that it's less effective with Omicron vs. other variants. Here's a New England Journal of Medicine study showing 95% effectiveness. https://t.co/bHij8r6T5Q
@ninjabroo じゃあパーセンテージは良いから『自分達は打たない』って件の信頼できる情報源を出してどうぞ。 ワクチン治験結果についてはこちらですw https://t.co/qE06FDwXiu
@MungPuppet You specifically asked what testing was done before rollout. Here it is. https://t.co/j3Sb4JvqvM Breakdown by age group is in Table 3 There is no breakdown by BMI
@realChrisBrunet Published on December 10, 2020: https://t.co/XEYhoPqTy8
@ChrisStraga @Mangan150 Indeed, it was stopped after the EUA, that is, after these results (2 months are well illustrated in limitations") https://t.co/Ph8R4rAYDP
@comboverwhelmed @pilgrimboy14 @KellyScaletta @stkirsch You mean you *haven't* read it? Seriously? https://t.co/Dsh3YOUs0x
@ChrisStraga @Mangan150 The EUA was the consequence of this 2 months https://t.co/Ph8R4rAYDP
@ChrisStraga @Mangan150 The EUA was obtained after the first two months results reported here https://t.co/Ph8R4rBwtn
@lancerz23 @StellaEscoTV @OANN This Study is Just Pfizer, Foreign One First ... Get it. This is just a Redundancy. We have been Studying ALL of them since 2020 https://t.co/N1UwIDJPSK
@Cervus2Leo @StellaEscoTV @OANN Also we have been doing this Study since 2020 ... This is just a BS Propaganda Move to waste more money. Act like they are doing something https://t.co/N1UwIDJPSK